Management of Pulmonary Embolism with Right Ventricular Strain
For older patients with PE and RV strain who are hemodynamically stable (systolic BP ≥90 mmHg without vasopressor support), initiate immediate anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and provide close monitoring, reserving thrombolysis only for those who deteriorate to shock or persistent hypotension. 1, 2
Risk Stratification Based on Hemodynamic Status
The critical first step is determining whether the patient has high-risk (massive) PE versus intermediate-risk (submassive) PE, as this fundamentally changes management 1, 2:
High-Risk PE (Massive PE)
- Defined by cardiogenic shock and/or persistent arterial hypotension (systolic BP <90 mmHg for ≥15 minutes or requiring vasopressor support) 1
- Mortality approaches 30% without reperfusion therapy 2
- Systemic thrombolysis is the first-line treatment with very few absolute contraindications 1
Intermediate-Risk PE (Submassive PE)
- Hemodynamically stable (systolic BP ≥90 mmHg) but with evidence of RV dysfunction on imaging or elevated cardiac biomarkers 1
- Mortality approximately 2.5% with anticoagulation alone 3
- Routine thrombolysis is NOT recommended 1
Initial Anticoagulation Strategy
Start unfractionated heparin immediately (80 U/kg bolus followed by 18 U/kg/h infusion, targeting aPTT 1.5-2.5 times normal) 1, 2:
- Unfractionated heparin is preferred over low-molecular-weight heparin in intermediate-risk PE because its short half-life allows rapid reversal if the patient deteriorates and requires thrombolysis 2
- For low-risk PE without RV dysfunction, direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban or apixaban) can be started directly after 1-2 days of parenteral anticoagulation 2, 4
- Fondaparinux (weight-adjusted: 5 mg if <50 kg, 7.5 mg if 50-100 kg, 10 mg if >100 kg subcutaneously once daily) is an alternative parenteral option 1, 4
Hemodynamic Support for Unstable Patients
If the patient has or develops hemodynamic instability 1, 2:
- Avoid aggressive fluid resuscitation, as this can worsen RV function by increasing RV wall tension 1, 2
- Norepinephrine is the vasopressor of choice for hypotensive patients 1, 2
- Consider dobutamine or dopamine if cardiac index is low but blood pressure remains normal 1, 2
- In refractory circulatory collapse, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be considered in combination with surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed treatment 5
Thrombolysis Decision-Making
When to Give Thrombolysis
Thrombolysis is indicated ONLY for 1:
- High-risk PE with shock or persistent hypotension (Class I recommendation)
- Selected younger intermediate-risk patients at low bleeding risk who deteriorate despite anticoagulation (conditional recommendation)
Evidence Against Routine Thrombolysis in Intermediate-Risk PE
Multiple meta-analyses demonstrate that in hemodynamically stable patients with RV dysfunction 1:
- Thrombolysis does NOT reduce mortality compared to anticoagulation alone
- Thrombolysis increases major bleeding risk (RR 1.89,31 more per 1000 patients) 1
- Thrombolysis increases intracranial bleeding risk (RR 3.17,7 more per 1000 patients) 1
- One study of 76 hemodynamically stable patients with RV enlargement treated with anticoagulation alone showed 0% PE-related mortality and 2.6% all-cause mortality 6
Contraindications to Thrombolysis
Relative contraindications (which may become less relevant in immediately life-threatening high-risk PE) 1:
- Transient ischemic attack in preceding 6 months
- Oral anticoagulant therapy
- Pregnancy or within 1 week postpartum
- Non-compressible punctures
- Traumatic resuscitation
- Refractory hypertension (systolic BP >180 mmHg)
- Advanced liver disease
- Infective endocarditis
- Active peptic ulcer
Alternative Reperfusion Strategies
If thrombolysis is contraindicated or has failed 1, 2:
- Surgical pulmonary embolectomy is the preferred alternative, performed via median sternotomy with normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass 1
- Catheter-directed therapy (embolectomy or fragmentation) can be considered, particularly if surgical expertise is unavailable 1, 2
- Surgical embolectomy has been successfully performed even in patients with RV dysfunction without persistent hypotension or shock in centers with routine cardiac surgery programs 1
Monitoring Strategy for Intermediate-Risk PE
Close monitoring is essential because approximately 2.5% of intermediate-risk patients may deteriorate to high-risk status 3:
- Continuous hemodynamic monitoring (blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation) 2
- Serial cardiac biomarkers (troponin, BNP/NT-proBNP) if initially elevated 2
- Monitor for signs of clinical deterioration requiring escalation to thrombolysis 1
- In one study, 8 of 322 intermediate-risk patients (2.5%) progressed to high-risk during hospitalization, with 75% mortality in this subgroup 3
Special Considerations for Older Patients with Comorbidities
The presence of underlying conditions (cancer, heart disease, clotting disorders) affects prognosis but not acute management strategy 1:
- Long-term prognosis is largely determined by underlying conditions rather than the PE itself 1
- Advanced age, cancer, stroke, and cardiopulmonary disease are associated with higher mortality 1
- These comorbidities increase bleeding risk with thrombolysis, further supporting anticoagulation-only approach in hemodynamically stable patients 1
Duration of Anticoagulation
Minimum 3 months of therapeutic anticoagulation for all patients 1, 2:
- For provoked PE (e.g., related to cancer, recent surgery, immobilization), continue anticoagulation as long as the risk factor persists 1, 2
- For unprovoked PE, consider extended anticoagulation beyond 3 months based on bleeding risk assessment 1, 2
- Transition from unfractionated heparin to vitamin K antagonist (target INR 2-3) or direct oral anticoagulant after 1-2 days 1, 2, 4
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not give thrombolysis to hemodynamically stable patients with RV strain based solely on imaging findings - this increases bleeding risk without mortality benefit 1, 6
- Do not delay anticoagulation while awaiting diagnostic confirmation in patients with high clinical probability of PE 1, 2, 5
- Do not use aggressive fluid resuscitation in patients with RV dysfunction, as this worsens RV function 1, 2
- Do not assume RV enlargement alone indicates poor prognosis - in hemodynamically stable patients without shock or critical illness, prognosis is good with anticoagulation alone 6
- Do not discharge patients with RV dysfunction without excluding right heart thrombi if early discharge is planned 1