Is CT (computed tomography) angio (angiography) appropriate for diagnosing pericarditis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 10, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

CT Angiography for Pericarditis

CT angiography (CTA) is not appropriate as a first-line imaging test for pericarditis, and there is no relevant literature supporting its use for this indication. 1

Imaging Hierarchy for Pericarditis

First-Line Imaging: Echocardiography

  • Transthoracic echocardiography is the first-line imaging test for suspected pericarditis, providing the most cost-effective way to detect pericardial effusion and assess hemodynamic significance 1, 2
  • Echocardiography accurately detects pericardial effusion (one of the four diagnostic criteria for pericarditis), cardiac tamponade, and ventricular dysfunction from myocardial involvement 1
  • Note that purely fibrinous acute pericarditis may show a normal echocardiogram, and up to 40% of pericarditis cases may lack typical findings 2

Second-Line Imaging: CT with Contrast (Not CTA)

When CT is indicated, cardiac CT with IV contrast—not CT angiography—should be used as a complementary imaging modality to echocardiography. 1

Specific CT Protocol Considerations:

  • CT chest with IV contrast or CT heart function and morphology are the appropriate CT protocols for pericardial disease evaluation 1
  • IV contrast administration is recommended to increase blood density and depict pericardial inflammation 1
  • Low-radiation cardiac CT using prospective ECG triggering is feasible 1

What CT Can Show:

  • Pericardial thickening or enhancement (sensitivity 54-59%, specificity 91-96% for acute pericarditis) 1, 3
  • Pericardial calcification (CT is the most accurate technique for this) 1
  • Size, location, and density of pericardial effusion not fully demonstrated by echocardiography 1
  • Pericardial masses, tumors, and involvement of adjacent structures 1
  • CT attenuation values can distinguish exudative from transudative pericardial fluid 1

Why CTA Specifically Is Not Appropriate:

  • There is no relevant literature supporting CTA chest or CTA coronary arteries for evaluation of pericardial disease 1
  • CTA protocols are designed for vascular imaging (coronary arteries, pulmonary embolism), not pericardial tissue characterization 1
  • While CTA may incidentally show pericardial changes like effusion, thickening, or enhancement, it is not a first-line or even second-line test for this purpose 1

Superior Alternative: Cardiac MRI

When echocardiography is nondiagnostic or there is diagnostic uncertainty, cardiac MRI is the preferred advanced imaging modality over CT. 1

  • CMR has 94-100% sensitivity for detecting pericardial inflammation 1
  • CMR shows pericardial enhancement, thickening, edema on T2-weighted images, and pericardial effusions 1
  • CMR can distinguish acute myopericarditis from other cardiomyopathies and occult MI 1
  • MRI provides better tissue characterization and functional assessment than CT without radiation exposure 1

Clinical Algorithm

  1. Start with transthoracic echocardiography in all patients with suspected pericarditis 1, 2
  2. If echocardiography is nondiagnostic or there is diagnostic uncertainty, proceed to cardiac MRI 1
  3. Consider cardiac CT with IV contrast (not CTA) only when:
    • MRI is contraindicated or unavailable 1
    • Evaluating for pericardial calcification or thickening in suspected constrictive pericarditis 1
    • Planning pericardiocentesis or pericardiectomy 1
    • Assessing for pericardial masses, tumors, or neoplastic involvement 1

Common Pitfalls

  • Do not order CTA protocols (designed for vascular imaging) when evaluating pericardial disease—the appropriate CT study is cardiac CT with IV contrast 1
  • CT has limited hemodynamic assessment capability compared to echocardiography and MRI, with suboptimal temporal resolution and increased artifact with tachycardia or unstable rhythm 1
  • CT findings for pericarditis have modest sensitivity (54-59%) despite high specificity (91-96%), so negative CT does not exclude pericarditis 1, 3
  • Pericardial thickening or enhancement on CT can also represent pericardial fibrosis, not just acute inflammation 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Criteria and Management of Pericarditis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Accuracy of computed tomography findings in acute pericarditis.

Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987), 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.