How does the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) differ from the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) and how is the RCRI calculated for a 65-year-old patient with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus undergoing elective knee replacement surgery?

DASI vs RCRI: Key Differences

The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) serve fundamentally different purposes in perioperative risk assessment: DASI measures functional capacity through patient-reported ability to perform daily activities, while RCRI stratifies cardiac risk based on clinical comorbidities and surgical factors. 1

Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)

Purpose and Structure:

• DASI is a 12-item questionnaire that quantifies functional capacity based on metabolic equivalents (METs) of daily activities 1
• Scores range from 0-58.2 points, with higher scores indicating better functional capacity 1
• Activities are weighted differently: self-care activities (2.75 points), climbing stairs (5.5 points), running (8 points), heavy housework (8 points), and strenuous sports (7.5 points) 1

Clinical Application:

• DASI scores ≤34 are associated with increased odds of 30-day death or myocardial infarction 1
• Functional capacity <4 METs (roughly equivalent to inability to climb 2 flights of stairs) identifies patients at 1.63 times higher rate of death, MI, acute heart failure, or life-threatening arrhythmias 1
• DASI provides superior risk prediction compared to subjective clinician assessment of functional capacity 1

Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI)

Calculation Method: The RCRI assigns 1 point for each of the following 6 risk factors present 1, 2:

1. History of ischemic heart disease
2. History of congestive heart failure
3. History of cerebrovascular disease (stroke or TIA)
4. Preoperative insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
5. Preoperative serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL (177 µmol/L) or chronic kidney disease
6. High-risk surgery (intraperitoneal, intrathoracic, or suprainguinal vascular procedures)

Risk Stratification:

• RCRI 0-1: Low risk (<1% MACE rate) 2, 3
• RCRI 2: Moderate risk 2, 3
• RCRI ≥3: High risk (14.4% complication rate) 1, 4

How They Differ

Complementary Roles:

• RCRI identifies who is at risk based on comorbidities; DASI identifies why they are at risk based on physiological reserve 1
• Adding functional capacity data to RCRI significantly increases its predictive power 1
• The 2024 AHA/ACC guidelines recommend using both: RCRI for initial stratification, then DASI for patients with RCRI ≥1 undergoing elevated-risk surgery 1

Predictive Performance:

• RCRI has modest discrimination (AUC ~0.79) and performs poorly in vascular surgery populations 1, 3
• DASI provides fair prediction of postoperative complications (AUC 0.71-0.75) and is an independent predictor beyond RCRI 5

Example RCRI Calculation

Case: 65-year-old with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus undergoing elective knee replacement

RCRI Score = 1 point:

• Ischemic heart disease: 0 points (not mentioned)
• Congestive heart failure: 0 points (not mentioned)
• Cerebrovascular disease: 0 points (not mentioned)
• Insulin-dependent diabetes: 1 point (diabetes present; assume insulin-treated)
• Renal dysfunction (Cr >2.0): 0 points (not mentioned)
• High-risk surgery: 0 points (knee replacement is intermediate-risk)

Risk Category: Low risk (RCRI = 1) with <1% risk of major adverse cardiac events 2, 3

Note: Hypertension and hyperlipidemia are NOT part of the RCRI calculation 1, 2

SOAP Note Implementation Examples

Example 1: Low-Risk Patient

Subjective: 65-year-old male presenting for preoperative evaluation before elective total knee arthroplasty. Reports ability to walk >4 blocks, climb 2 flights of stairs without stopping, and perform moderate housework without limitation.

Objective:

• Vital signs: BP 138/82, HR 72, regular
• Cardiac exam: Regular rate and rhythm, no murmurs
• RCRI calculation: 1 point (insulin-dependent diabetes only)
• DASI score: 42 (good functional capacity, >4 METs equivalent)

Assessment: Low perioperative cardiac risk (RCRI = 1, <1% MACE risk). Excellent functional capacity (DASI 42, >34 threshold) further supports low-risk classification. 1, 2, 5

Plan: Proceed with planned surgery without additional cardiac testing. Continue home medications perioperatively. Consider perioperative beta-blockade per institutional protocol. 1

---

Example 2: High-Risk Patient

Subjective: 72-year-old female presenting for preoperative evaluation before elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Reports dyspnea with <1 block walking, unable to climb stairs without stopping. History of prior MI (3 years ago), CHF (EF 35%), and stroke (5 years ago).

Objective:

• Vital signs: BP 142/88, HR 88, irregular
• Cardiac exam: Irregular rhythm, 2/6 systolic murmur
• Labs: Creatinine 2.4 mg/dL
• RCRI calculation: 5 points (ischemic heart disease, CHF, cerebrovascular disease, renal dysfunction, high-risk surgery)
• DASI score: 18 (poor functional capacity, <4 METs equivalent)

Assessment: Very high perioperative cardiac risk (RCRI = 5, >14% MACE risk). Poor functional capacity (DASI 18, well below 34 threshold) confirms high-risk status and inability to meet physiologic demands of surgery. 1, 4

Plan:

1. Cardiology consultation for optimization of heart failure management
2. Consider pharmacological stress testing if results would change management (revascularization vs. medical optimization vs. surgical cancellation) 1, 3
3. Measure preoperative NT-proBNP and troponin for enhanced risk stratification 2, 3
4. Postoperative troponin monitoring at 48-72 hours 2
5. Discuss risks/benefits with patient and surgical team; consider alternative management strategies for AAA

---

Example 3: Moderate-Risk Patient

Subjective: 68-year-old male for preoperative clearance before elective colectomy for colon cancer. Reports ability to walk 2-3 blocks before stopping due to leg fatigue, can climb 1 flight of stairs slowly. History of type 2 diabetes (on insulin) and prior TIA (2 years ago).

Objective:

• Vital signs: BP 132/78, HR 76, regular
• Cardiac exam: Normal S1/S2, no murmurs
• RCRI calculation: 3 points (cerebrovascular disease, insulin-dependent diabetes, high-risk surgery [intraperitoneal])
• DASI score: 28 (borderline functional capacity, approaching <4 METs)

Assessment: High perioperative cardiac risk (RCRI = 3, ~7-14% MACE risk). Borderline functional capacity (DASI 28, below 34 threshold) suggests limited physiologic reserve. 1, 4, 5

Plan:

1. Obtain baseline troponin and NT-proBNP for enhanced risk prediction 2, 3
2. Optimize medical management: ensure on appropriate antiplatelet therapy, statin, and consider beta-blocker initiation 1
3. Postoperative troponin monitoring at 24 and 48 hours 2
4. Proceed with surgery given oncologic indication, but with heightened perioperative monitoring
5. ICU bed reservation for immediate postoperative period

Common Pitfalls

RCRI Limitations:

• Does not include age as a variable, despite age being a powerful independent predictor of complications 3, 6
• The creatinine cutoff of >2.0 mg/dL is outdated; GFR <30 mL/min is a better predictor 6, 4
• Performs poorly in vascular surgery populations; consider NSQIP calculator instead 1, 3

DASI Limitations:

• Relies on patient self-report, which may overestimate actual functional capacity 1
• Optimal threshold varies by study (ranging from 28-34 points) 5
• Significant heterogeneity in outcome definitions across validation studies 5

Integration Errors:

• Do not use DASI alone without RCRI for initial risk stratification 1
• Do not order stress testing unless abnormal results would change management (revascularization, medication changes, or surgical cancellation) 1, 3
• Emergency surgery negates the utility of extensive preoperative testing; focus on immediate medical optimization 3