Best Hepatitis B Screening Strategy for General Population
For the general population without specific risk factors, universal screening of all adults aged ≥18 years at least once in their lifetime is now the recommended approach, using a three-test panel: HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs. 1, 2
Rationale for Universal Screening
The shift from risk-based to universal screening is supported by compelling evidence:
- Risk-based screening misses significant infections: 21% of patients with chronic HBV had no identifiable risk factors in a large prospective study 1
- Risk assessment is impractical: Approximately 90% of patients have at least one risk variable, making selective screening inefficient and requiring nearly universal testing anyway 1
- Low screening rates with risk-based approaches: Oncologists and primary care providers often lack time or familiarity with HBV risk factors, resulting in missed diagnoses 1
Recommended Screening Panel
Three-Test Approach (Preferred)
Order all three tests simultaneously: 1, 3, 2
- Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) - detects active infection (acute or chronic) 1
- Hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) total or IgG - indicates previous or ongoing infection 1, 3, 2
- Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) - indicates immunity from vaccination or resolved infection 3, 2
Interpretation Algorithm
| HBsAg | anti-HBc | anti-HBs | Interpretation | Next Steps |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Positive | Negative | Active chronic HBV infection | Order HBeAg, anti-HBe, quantitative HBV DNA; refer to hepatology [3,2] |
| Negative | Positive | Positive | Resolved infection | No immediate action; consider HBV DNA if immunosuppression planned [3,2] |
| Negative | Positive | Negative | Isolated core antibody (possible occult HBV) | Order quantitative HBV DNA, especially if immunosuppression planned [3,4] |
| Negative | Negative | Positive | Immunity from vaccination | No action needed [3,2] |
| Negative | Negative | Negative | Susceptible to HBV | Offer vaccination [3,2] |
Special Populations Requiring Screening
Even with universal screening recommendations, these groups warrant particular attention: 1, 2
High-Priority Groups
- Geographic origin: Persons from countries with HBsAg prevalence ≥2% (Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, Pacific Islands, parts of South America, Eastern Europe) 1
- Behavioral risks: Injection drug users, men who have sex with men, persons with multiple sexual partners 1
- Medical risks: HIV-positive persons, household/sexual contacts of HBV-infected persons, persons on hemodialysis 1
- Immunosuppression planned: Anyone starting chemotherapy, immunosuppressive therapy, or biologic agents 1
Critical Timing for Immunosuppression
For patients starting immunosuppressive therapy, screening is mandatory before treatment initiation (though treatment should not be delayed for results): 1
- High-risk immunosuppression (B-cell depleting agents, anti-CD20 therapy, stem cell transplant): Requires antiviral prophylaxis if HBsAg-positive or anti-HBc-positive 1
- Moderate-risk immunosuppression (anthracyclines, anti-TNF therapy, corticosteroids ≥4 weeks): Consider prophylaxis vs. monitoring based on serologic status 1
- Low-risk immunosuppression (short-term corticosteroids <1 week): Monitoring alone typically sufficient 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Testing Errors
- Do NOT order only HBsAg: This misses resolved infections (anti-HBc-positive) that can reactivate with immunosuppression 1, 3
- Do NOT order IgM anti-HBc for routine screening: This is only for suspected acute hepatitis B 3
- Do NOT skip testing in vaccinated individuals: Breakthrough infections occur, and vaccination history is often unreliable 3, 2
Interpretation Errors
- Isolated anti-HBc positivity (HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive, anti-HBs-negative) represents either distant resolved infection or occult HBV infection 3, 4
Follow-up Errors
- Low-positive results for anti-HBs or anti-HBc alone are often nonspecific and should be interpreted cautiously 5
- Confirmatory testing with neutralizing assays should be performed for initially reactive HBsAg results 1
Cost-Effectiveness Considerations
While the three-test panel adds cost compared to HBsAg alone, the universal screening approach is justified because: 1
- Risk-based screening requires nearly universal testing anyway (90% of patients have ≥1 risk factor) 1
- Missing occult infections leads to preventable HBV reactivation, hepatic decompensation, and death 1
- Early identification enables HCC surveillance in chronic carriers, improving mortality 6, 7
- Identifying susceptible individuals allows vaccination to prevent future infection 2, 8
Implementation Strategy
Screen all adults ≥18 years at least once with the three-test panel (HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBs) 1, 2
For ongoing risk factors (current injection drug use, multiple sexual partners, healthcare workers with exposure risk), repeat screening periodically 2
Before any immunosuppressive therapy, ensure screening is complete regardless of prior testing, as this is a critical intervention point to prevent morbidity and mortality 1