Elevated INR in Patients Not on Warfarin
In patients not taking warfarin, an elevated INR most commonly indicates vitamin K deficiency, liver disease, or the presence of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and determining the specific cause is essential because plasma transfusion is inappropriate for most of these conditions. 1
Primary Causes of Elevated INR Without Warfarin
Vitamin K Deficiency Pattern
- Vitamin K deficiency is characterized by low Factor VII, Factor X, Protein C, and Protein S levels and represents one of the most common causes of elevated INR in ICU patients not on warfarin 1
- This pattern occurs due to malnutrition, prolonged antibiotic use (which disrupts gut microbiome vitamin K production), or malabsorption 2
- Factor VII levels correlate inversely with INR (r = -0.81), making it a key diagnostic marker 1
- Vitamin K deficiency is reversible with vitamin K administration, making plasma transfusion unnecessary 1
Liver Disease Pattern
- Liver disease causes elevated INR through reduced synthesis of clotting factors, characterized by low Factor V, low or normal fibrinogen, and high Factor VIII 1
- Factor V is synthesized exclusively in the liver and is not vitamin K-dependent, distinguishing this from vitamin K deficiency 1
- The INR is not validated for assessing bleeding risk in liver disease patients, as it was designed and standardized only for warfarin monitoring 2
- Plasma transfusion is inappropriate for liver disease coagulopathy as it provides only transient correction without addressing the underlying synthetic defect 1
Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs)
- DOACs, particularly apixaban and rivaroxaban, can elevate INR even though INR monitoring is not recommended for these agents 3, 1
- In one study of ICU patients with elevated INR, 7 out of 48 cases (15%) were due to unrecognized DOAC presence (anti-Xa >0.01 IU/ml) 1
- Apixaban typically causes median INR elevations of 1.4-1.7, though extreme elevations (INR >20) have been reported in patients with renal impairment 3
- Plasma transfusion is completely ineffective for reversing DOAC-related INR elevation 1
Secondary and Contributing Factors
Critical Illness and Inflammatory States
- Most ICU patients with elevated INR demonstrate high Factor VIII and D-dimers with reduced anticoagulant proteins (Protein C and Protein S), indicating a prothrombotic state despite the elevated INR 1
- This paradoxical finding suggests the INR does not accurately reflect bleeding risk in critically ill patients 1
Medication Interactions
- Antibiotics alter gut microbiome and reduce vitamin K production, with sulfonamides and metronidazole having additional CYP2C9 inhibitory effects that can elevate INR 2
- Acetaminophen increases INR in a dose-dependent manner, with risk of INR >6 increasing 10-fold when intake exceeds 9.1 grams per week 2
- NSAIDs can displace anticoagulants from protein binding sites and independently increase bleeding risk 2
Poor Prognosis Indicators
- Patients without anticoagulant treatment who present with INR >9 have extremely poor outcomes: 67% experience bleeding and 74% mortality 4
- This suggests the elevated INR reflects severe underlying disease (sepsis, liver failure, DIC) rather than a reversible coagulopathy 4
Diagnostic Approach
Laboratory Evaluation
- Measure Factor VII, Factor X, Factor V, Factor VIII, fibrinogen, Protein C, Protein S, and anti-Xa activity to distinguish between vitamin K deficiency, liver disease, and DOAC presence 1
- Factor VII and Factor X correlate inversely with INR (r = -0.81 and r = -0.67 respectively), while Factor V and fibrinogen do not 1
- Review baseline INR if available; normal baseline INR prior to acute illness suggests acquired rather than chronic coagulopathy 3
Clinical Context Assessment
- Evaluate for malnutrition, recent antibiotic use, liver disease, critical illness, and medication history including over-the-counter drugs and supplements 2, 1
- In 48 ICU patients with elevated INR studied, 40% had vitamin K deficiency pattern, 35% had liver disease pattern, 15% had DOACs, and 10% were equivocal 1
Management Implications
Avoid Inappropriate Plasma Transfusion
- Plasma transfusion for mildly elevated INR (1.5-2.0) in non-warfarin patients lacks biological plausibility and credible evidence 2
- Plasma is ineffective for DOAC reversal, provides only transient correction in liver disease, and is unnecessary when vitamin K deficiency is the cause 1
- The practice of prophylactic plasma transfusion based on INR targets accounts for the majority of plasma use at many institutions despite lack of evidence 2
Appropriate Interventions
- For vitamin K deficiency: administer vitamin K 1-2.5 mg orally, which corrects INR within 24-48 hours 5, 6
- For liver disease: address underlying hepatic dysfunction; plasma provides no sustained benefit 1
- For DOACs: discontinue if inappropriate; use specific reversal agents (andexanet alfa for apixaban/rivaroxaban) only for life-threatening bleeding 3
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never assume elevated INR indicates warfarin effect without confirming warfarin use 1
- Do not use INR to predict bleeding risk in non-warfarin patients, as it lacks validation for this purpose 2
- Avoid reflexive plasma transfusion for INR 1.5-2.0 range, which represents the majority of inappropriate plasma use 2, 1
- Recognize that hospitalized patients with INR >9 may not respond quickly to vitamin K alone and may require plasma infusion only if active bleeding is present 4