Blood Tests for Cancer Surveillance
Routine blood tests, including tumor markers, are NOT recommended for cancer surveillance in asymptomatic patients with a history of cancer, as they have not been shown to improve survival or quality of life. 1
Evidence-Based Surveillance Approach
What NOT to Order
The strongest guideline evidence consistently recommends AGAINST routine laboratory testing for cancer surveillance:
- No tumor markers (CEA, CA 15-3, CA 27.29) should be ordered routinely in asymptomatic breast cancer survivors 1, 2
- No routine CBC, chemistry panels, or liver function tests for breast cancer follow-up 1
- No routine CEA testing for colorectal cancer surveillance in asymptomatic patients 1
- These tests have not demonstrated survival benefit and lead to false-positive results requiring additional unnecessary testing 1
The Cornerstone of Surveillance
History and physical examination remain the gold standard for cancer surveillance, as 41-83% of recurrences are detected by patient-reported symptoms 2:
- Breast cancer survivors: History and physical every 3-6 months for first 3 years, then every 6-12 months for years 4-5, then annually 1, 2
- Colorectal cancer survivors: Similar schedule with focus on symptoms of recurrence 1
- Physical examination alone detects 35-68% of recurrences 2
When Blood Tests ARE Indicated
Blood tests should only be ordered when clinically indicated by symptoms or examination findings 2:
- New bone pain, chest pain, abdominal pain, persistent cough, or neurological symptoms warrant investigation 2
- Abnormal physical examination findings (hepatomegaly, lymphadenopathy) justify targeted testing 2
- Symptomatic patients may benefit from CEA, liver enzymes, or other tests to guide diagnostic imaging 1
Cancer-Specific Imaging Surveillance
Breast Cancer
- Annual mammography is the only recommended routine test 1, 2
- No routine CT, MRI, PET scans, bone scans, or chest x-rays in asymptomatic patients 1
Colorectal Cancer
- Colonoscopy at 1 year post-resection, then per guidelines based on findings 1
- CT imaging only for symptomatic patients or abnormal findings 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Ordering routine tumor markers creates more harm than benefit through:
- False-positive results leading to unnecessary anxiety and additional testing 1
- No demonstrated improvement in survival outcomes 1
- Increased healthcare costs without clinical benefit 1
- Risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment 3, 4
The 0.22% rate of futile invasive procedures from false-positive screening tests demonstrates real patient harm 5
Emerging Technologies
Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) blood tests are investigational and NOT recommended for routine surveillance 4, 6:
- Sensitivity ranges from 27-95% but is lower for early-stage cancers 4
- Prospective trials are needed to demonstrate mortality benefit 4, 6
- Current evidence shows feasibility but not clinical utility for surveillance 5, 7
- These tests may complement but not replace standard screening 6
Patient Education Priority
Educate patients about symptoms of recurrence rather than relying on blood tests 1: