What blood tests are recommended for diagnosing a suspected fungal infection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Blood Tests for Diagnosing Suspected Fungal Infections

For suspected invasive fungal infections, obtain serum galactomannan (GM) testing as the first-line blood test, performed at least twice weekly in high-risk immunocompromised patients, with serum (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) as a complementary test when GM is negative but clinical suspicion remains high. 1, 2

Primary Blood Tests by Clinical Context

For Suspected Invasive Aspergillosis (Most Common Scenario)

Serum Galactomannan (GM):

  • This is the gold standard first-line blood test with sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 89% at an optical density index cutoff of 0.5 on two consecutive samples 1
  • Must be performed at least 2 times per week due to transient circulation of GM in serum 1
  • Has a very high negative predictive value (>90%) for ruling out invasive aspergillosis 1
  • Critical caveat: A single negative test does NOT rule out infection—serial monitoring every 3-4 days is essential in high-risk patients 3

Serum (1→3)-β-D-Glucan (BDG):

  • Use as a complementary test, NOT as the sole diagnostic test 2, 3
  • Sensitivity ranges from 50-70% and specificity 91-99% in hematological malignancy patients 2
  • Detects multiple fungal species (Candida, Aspergillus, Pneumocystis, Fusarium) but NOT Zygomycetes or Cryptococcus 3
  • Major limitation: Low specificity means it should never be relied upon alone for diagnostic decision-making 2, 3

For Suspected Invasive Candidiasis in ICU Patients

Serum β-D-Glucan:

  • Sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 60% for invasive candidiasis or candidemia in critically ill patients 4
  • Higher cutoff values increase specificity but reduce sensitivity 2
  • High negative predictive value (85-92%) makes it useful for excluding disease in ICU patients 2

For Endemic Mycoses (Histoplasmosis, Blastomycosis, Coccidioidomycosis)

Serum Antibody Testing:

  • Pathogen-specific antibody testing is recommended for suspected endemic mycoses 2
  • Serial testing with close follow-up is necessary in patients from endemic areas with suspected community-acquired pneumonia 2

Molecular Blood Tests

Aspergillus PCR (Blood or Serum):

  • Recommended in severely immunocompromised patients with suspected invasive pulmonary aspergillosis 2, 1
  • Sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 79% for blood/serum samples 4
  • Can detect fungal DNA even after antifungal treatment has been initiated 2
  • Important limitation: Lack of standardization across laboratories means it's not yet included in mandatory recommendations 2

Pan-Fungal PCR:

  • Targets conserved fungal DNA regions (18S rRNA, 28S rRNA, or ITS) 2, 1
  • Sensitivity ranges from 65-100% and specificity 65-75% depending on methodology 2
  • Particularly valuable when the causative pathogen is unknown in immunocompromised patients 2
  • Must be used in combination with other diagnostic methods for optimal results 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

False-Positive Galactomannan Results:

  • Piperacillin-tazobactam and other β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations cause false positives 3
  • Chemotherapy or mucositis may lead to false positives from cross-reactive epitopes 3

False-Negative Galactomannan Results:

  • Mold-active antifungal prophylaxis or therapy significantly reduces sensitivity 3

False-Positive β-D-Glucan Results:

  • Early ICU admission, concurrent bacterial infections, certain hemodialysis filters, beta-lactam antimicrobials, and immunoglobulin administration can all cause false positives 2, 5

Single Test Limitations:

  • The sensitivity of a single-serum fungal antigen test is low, particularly in patients receiving antifungal agents 6
  • Never rely on a single negative test to rule out invasive fungal infection—serial testing and combination of tests are required 1

Optimal Diagnostic Algorithm

  1. Start with serum GM testing twice weekly in all high-risk immunocompromised patients with suspected invasive aspergillosis 1

  2. Add serum BDG for complementary information, especially if GM is negative but clinical suspicion remains high 2, 1

  3. Consider Aspergillus PCR on blood samples in severely immunocompromised patients 2, 1

  4. If blood tests are negative but clinical suspicion is high, proceed to bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for GM BAL testing (sensitivity 84%, specificity 88%) 1

  5. Combination testing provides the best diagnostic accuracy: GM (BAL) with BDG (serum) shows sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 93%, with diagnostic odds ratio of 153.0 1

Special Considerations for Immunocompromised Patients

  • Blood cultures should be obtained in neutropenic patients with skin lesions, as they may harbor resistant microbes, yeast, or molds 6
  • Multiple diagnostic tests should be performed simultaneously in immunocompromised patients with hematological malignancies due to high mortality risk 2
  • Antibody testing against Aspergillus is often not detected in immunocompromised patients, making it useless for acute diagnosis 1

References

Guideline

Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections in Immunocompromised Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Suspected Fungal Pneumonia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Suspected Aspergillus Sacroiliitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.