Can pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab) plus cisplatin (cisplatin)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) be used in a patient with recurrent sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma and a PD-L1 (Programmed Death-Ligand 1) expression of 0?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pembrolizumab Plus Cisplatin/5-FU in PD-L1 CPS 0 Recurrent Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Yes, pembrolizumab plus cisplatin/5-FU can be used in patients with PD-L1 CPS 0, as the FDA has approved this combination regardless of PD-L1 expression status, though the evidence for survival benefit specifically in PD-L1-negative patients remains uncertain. 1

Regulatory Approval and Evidence Base

FDA vs EMA Divergence

  • The FDA approved pembrolizumab combined with platinum/5-FU as first-line treatment regardless of PD-L1 expression, making it a valid option for your patient with CPS 0. 1
  • In contrast, the EMA has only approved pembrolizumab (with or without chemotherapy) for patients with CPS ≥1, reflecting more conservative interpretation of the KEYNOTE-048 data. 1
  • ASCO guidelines support pembrolizumab plus platinum/5-FU for CPS <1 patients with moderate evidence quality and strong recommendation strength. 1

Evidence Limitations in PD-L1-Negative Disease

  • The KEYNOTE-048 trial showed improved overall survival with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus cetuximab plus chemotherapy in the total population (13.0 vs 10.7 months, HR 0.77, p=0.0034). 1, 2
  • However, in the CPS <1 subgroup specifically, median OS was 11.3 months with pembrolizumab/chemotherapy versus 10.7 months with cetuximab/chemotherapy (HR 1.12,95% CI 0.76-1.94, p=0.78932), showing no statistically significant benefit. 1
  • This subgroup included only 39 and 43 patients respectively, and the study was not powered to evaluate efficacy in PD-L1-negative patients. 1
  • Current evidence does not definitively establish whether platinum/5-FU/pembrolizumab improves survival compared with platinum/5-FU/cetuximab in patients not expressing PD-L1. 1

Clinical Decision Algorithm for CPS 0 Patients

When to Use Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy (CPS 0)

Use pembrolizumab/cisplatin/5-FU when:

  • Patient requires rapid tumor shrinkage due to symptomatic disease burden 1
  • Patient has good performance status and can tolerate combination therapy 3
  • No contraindications to anti-PD-1 inhibitors exist 1
  • Operating under FDA jurisdiction where this is approved 1

When to Consider EXTREME Regimen Instead

Consider cetuximab/platinum/5-FU (EXTREME) when:

  • Patient has PD-L1-negative tumor (CPS <1) and you prioritize evidence-based benefit over regulatory approval 1
  • Operating under EMA jurisdiction where pembrolizumab is not approved for CPS <1 1
  • Patient has contraindications to immunotherapy 1
  • EXTREME remains standard of care for PD-L1-negative tumors with Level I, Grade A evidence (ESMO-MCBS score: 3) 1

Special Considerations for Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Limited Evidence Base

  • Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma was specifically excluded from the KEYNOTE-048 and KEYNOTE-040 trials, meaning the evidence base is extrapolated from other head and neck sites. 4
  • A recent prospective phase II study (2025) evaluated pembrolizumab with nab-paclitaxel and platinum in recurrent/metastatic sinonasal SCC, showing 60% ORR and median PFS of 12.2 months, though this used nab-paclitaxel rather than 5-FU. 5
  • Case reports demonstrate pembrolizumab can induce remission in recurrent/metastatic sinonasal SCC, though data remain sparse. 4

Practical Implementation

Treatment Selection Based on Clinical Scenario

For symptomatic patients requiring rapid response:

  • Pembrolizumab plus cisplatin/5-FU is appropriate despite CPS 0, as response rates (35.6-36.3%) and PFS (4.9-5.1 months) were similar between pembrolizumab/chemotherapy and cetuximab/chemotherapy arms regardless of PD-L1 status. 1

For less symptomatic patients:

  • EXTREME regimen may be preferred given the lack of proven survival benefit with pembrolizumab in CPS <1 subgroup and established Level I evidence for EXTREME. 1

Toxicity Considerations

  • Grade 3-5 adverse events are similar between pembrolizumab/chemotherapy (83.3%) and cetuximab/chemotherapy (85.1%). 1
  • Treatment-related deaths occurred in 12% with pembrolizumab/chemotherapy versus 10% with cetuximab/chemotherapy. 2

Critical Caveat

The survival benefit of adding pembrolizumab to platinum/5-FU in PD-L1-negative patients remains unproven, and the decision to use this combination in CPS 0 patients relies on FDA approval and extrapolation from total population data rather than subgroup-specific evidence. 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.