What are the key differences in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis between Hodgkin's lymphoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Hodgkin's vs Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Key Differences

The fundamental distinction between Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is pathologic: Hodgkin's lymphoma is defined by the presence of Reed-Sternberg cells (in classical HL) or lymphocyte-predominant "popcorn" cells (in nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL), while non-Hodgkin's lymphoma lacks these characteristic cells and consists of various other malignant lymphoid cell types. 1

Epidemiology and Incidence

Age Distribution:

  • Hodgkin's lymphoma demonstrates a characteristic bimodal age distribution with peaks at 15-30 years and after age 55, making it particularly common in young adults aged 20-40 years 2, 1
  • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma incidence increases progressively with age, from 0.3/100,000 per year in ages 35-39 to 26.6/100,000 per year in ages 80-84 2

Relative Frequency:

  • Hodgkin's lymphoma accounts for approximately 5% of all lymphomas in Western countries, with a crude incidence of 2.3 cases/100,000/year in the European Union 2, 1
  • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is far more common, with a crude incidence of 3-4/100,000/year for large cell lymphoma alone, and B-cell lymphomas constituting approximately 80-90% of all NHL cases 2, 3

Histologic and Cellular Characteristics

Hodgkin's Lymphoma:

  • Classical HL (95% of cases) is characterized by Reed-Sternberg cells embedded in an inflammatory background, with malignant cells representing only a small fraction of the total cellular population 2, 1
  • Immunophenotype: HRS cells stain consistently positive for CD30 and CD15, occasionally positive for CD20, and negative for CD45 2
  • Nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL (5% of cases) contains LP cells ("popcorn cells") that are CD20+, CD45+, but lack CD15 and CD30 2

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma:

  • NHL represents a highly heterogeneous group with multiple subtypes, lacking Reed-Sternberg cells 1, 3
  • B-cell lymphomas account for 80-90% of NHL, with follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma being the most common entities 3
  • T-cell lymphomas represent 15-20% of cases, while NK-cell lymphomas are rare 2

Diagnostic Approach

Biopsy Requirements:

  • Both HL and NHL require excisional lymph node biopsy for definitive diagnosis, as fine-needle aspiration alone is insufficient 2, 1, 4
  • The specimen must provide enough material for fresh frozen and formalin-fixed samples to allow comprehensive immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and molecular studies 2

Immunohistochemistry:

  • Immunohistochemistry is highly recommended and often essential to distinguish between HL and NHL, particularly when Reed-Sternberg-like cells appear in NHL (a rare diagnostic pitfall) 2, 1
  • For classical HL: CD30+, CD15+ (majority); CD3-, CD45-; CD20+ (<40%) 2
  • For NLPHL: CD20+, CD45+; CD3-, CD15-, CD30- 2

Staging and Risk Assessment

Common Elements:

  • Both use the Ann Arbor staging classification system 2
  • Both require assessment of B symptoms (fever, drenching night sweats, unexplained weight loss >10% over 6 months) 2
  • PET-CT is the gold standard for staging FDG-avid lymphomas in both diseases 2, 4

Hodgkin's-Specific Risk Stratification:

  • Patients are allocated to three categories: limited, intermediate, and advanced stages based on EORTC/LYSA or GHSG definitions 2
  • Given the high sensitivity of PET-CT for bone marrow involvement, bone marrow biopsy is no longer indicated in HL patients undergoing PET-CT evaluation 2
  • ESR is a key prognostic factor in HL staging 2

Non-Hodgkin's-Specific Risk Stratification:

  • The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is used to define prognostic subgroups in NHL 2, 3
  • Bone marrow biopsy is required in stage IB, IIB, and stage III-IV NHL 2
  • Risk assessment varies significantly by NHL subtype (follicular vs. DLBCL vs. others) 3

Treatment Approaches

Hodgkin's Lymphoma:

  • Hodgkin's lymphoma is now curable in at least 80% of patients with modern treatment 1
  • Standard treatment for early-stage favorable HL is combined modality therapy with ABVD x 2-4 cycles or Stanford V x 8 weeks plus involved-field radiotherapy 2
  • Treatment considerations often focus on minimizing long-term toxicity rather than improving cure rates, especially in early-stage disease 1
  • Bleomycin is FDA-approved for use in Hodgkin's disease as part of combination regimens 5

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma:

  • Treatment is highly dependent on histologic subtype and stage 3
  • For CD20+ large-cell NHL, CHOP combined with rituximab every 21 days for usually 8 cycles is the current standard 2
  • Rituximab is FDA-approved for multiple NHL subtypes including relapsed/refractory low-grade or follicular B-cell NHL, previously untreated follicular NHL, and diffuse large B-cell NHL in combination with CHOP 6
  • For follicular lymphoma with early-stage disease, radiation therapy is generally used, whereas stage III-IV disease requires chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radioimmunotherapy 3
  • High-dose therapy with stem cell support is the treatment of choice for chemosensitive relapsed aggressive lymphomas 3

Prognosis

Hodgkin's Lymphoma:

  • Mortality rate is 0.4 cases/100,000/year in the European Union 2
  • Cure rates exceed 80% with modern therapy 1
  • Long-term survivors face risks of treatment-related complications including secondary malignancies 7

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma:

  • Prognosis varies dramatically by subtype 3
  • Follicular lymphoma patients generally experience long survival, but only a minority are cured 3
  • Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has better cure potential with aggressive treatment, but disease relapse remains a significant problem 3

Critical Diagnostic Pitfalls

Common Errors to Avoid:

  • Never rely on fine-needle aspiration alone for initial diagnosis of either lymphoma type 1, 4
  • Do not fail to perform comprehensive immunophenotyping, as this is essential for distinguishing HL from NHL and for NHL subtype classification 2, 1
  • Do not skip baseline PET-CT before therapy in FDG-avid lymphomas, as this compromises accurate response assessment 4
  • Be aware that Reed-Sternberg-like cells can rarely appear in NHL, making immunohistochemistry critical for accurate diagnosis 1

References

Guideline

Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma: diagnosis and treatment.

Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2005

Guideline

Lymphoma Evaluation and Staging

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.