What are the diagnostic and treatment approaches for a patient presenting with suspected Brunner's gland issues, such as abdominal pain or gastrointestinal bleeding, considering their overall health and potential history of gastrointestinal diseases?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 12, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Brunner's Gland Lesions: Diagnostic and Management Approach

Overview and Clinical Significance

Brunner gland hamartomas are uncommon, benign, often solitary pedunculated lesions arising from lobular proliferation of normal duodenal Brunner glands, typically 2-5 cm in size, and resection is generally unnecessary unless they are symptomatic or large (>2 cm) causing partial obstruction, pain, or bleeding. 1

These lesions are most frequently identified in the duodenal bulb and are usually asymptomatic, discovered incidentally during upper endoscopy. 1 However, large lesions may cause acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage associated with iron deficiency anemia. 1 Rare cases of dysplasia have been reported, though the malignant potential remains largely unknown. 1, 2


Diagnostic Approach

Initial Endoscopic Evaluation

  • Careful optical evaluation and pathologic inspection are critical, as non-neoplastic duodenal lesions (including Brunner gland hamartomas, metaplastic foveolar epithelium, and gastric heterotopia) may mimic neoplastic adenomatous pathology. 1

  • Identification of the major and minor papilla with photodocumentation is essential to ensure no involvement by the lesion before considering any intervention. 1

  • Endoscopic examination typically reveals a submucosal nodule or pedunculated mass, often with a stalk originating from the duodenal bulb. 3

Imaging Characteristics

  • CT and MRI may reveal internal cystic changes within the mass and a stalk originating in the duodenal bulb, which are useful diagnostic features for Brunner gland hamartoma. 3

  • Abdominal CT may show circumferential thickening or a stenosing mass in the first part of the duodenum when lesions are large and obstructive. 4

  • Imaging and endoscopy findings can be strongly suggestive of malignancy, particularly with larger lesions, making extensive pre-operative evaluation critical. 4

Tissue Diagnosis

  • Endoscopic biopsies are essential but may be falsely negative, as demonstrated by cases where pre-operative biopsies were negative despite significant lesions. 4

  • Cytological diagnosis reveals monomorphic cells arranged as loosely clustered epithelial cells with abundant, clear, and granular cytoplasm, eccentrically located nuclei, and immunoreactivity for MUC-6. 5

  • Repetitive tumor biopsies may be necessary to avoid radical surgical procedures when malignancy cannot be definitively excluded. 4


Management Algorithm

For Asymptomatic or Small Lesions (<2 cm)

No endoscopic resection is required for asymptomatic Brunner gland hamartomas or those <2 cm in size. 1

  • Conservative management with observation is appropriate. 1

  • Endoscopic surveillance is not routinely indicated unless symptoms develop. 1

For Symptomatic or Large Lesions (≥2 cm)

Endoscopic resection is indicated for Brunner gland hamartomas that are symptomatic (causing bleeding, pain, or obstruction) or large (>2 cm). 1

Specific Indications for Resection:

  • Gastrointestinal bleeding (acute upper GI hemorrhage or chronic bleeding with iron deficiency anemia) 1, 2
  • Partial duodenal obstruction with obstructive symptoms (recurrent vomiting, weight loss, epigastric pain) 4
  • Abdominal pain attributed to the lesion 1
  • Lesions causing surface ulceration with bleeding risk 1

Endoscopic Resection Technique:

  • The duodenal bulb is thicker than the descending duodenum, making tissue transection by diathermy much slower, analogous to the gastric antrum. 1

  • Confirmation that the lesion is not adjacent to or involving the major papilla is critical before polypectomy. 1

  • For lesions on the medial wall within 5 cm of the papilla, a duodenoscope should be used. 1

  • Complete resection during the initial session is essential, as the initial attempt provides the highest chance of success and lowest risk of complications. 1

Surgical Management

Surgical treatment should be conservative since Brunner gland lesions are not premalignant, and local excision is the treatment of choice if complications occur. 6

Indications for Surgery:

  • Emergency situations with severe obstruction or uncontrolled bleeding 1
  • Failure of endoscopic resection 1
  • When malignancy cannot be excluded despite extensive evaluation 4

Duodenocephalopancreatectomy should be avoided when possible, as it represents overly aggressive treatment for a benign condition. 4 However, when imaging and endoscopy are strongly suggestive of malignancy and biopsies remain inconclusive, surgical resection may be necessary. 4


Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never assume all duodenal masses are benign—extensive pre-operative evaluation including repetitive biopsies is necessary to avoid both under-treatment of malignancy and over-treatment of benign lesions. 4

  • Do not attribute gastrointestinal bleeding to Brunner gland hamartomas without proper evaluation, as fatal hemorrhage has been reported. 2

  • Avoid partial resection or leaving lesions incompletely resected, as this increases recurrence risk and complication rates. 1

  • Do not perform endoscopic resection without confirming the lesion's relationship to the major papilla, as inadvertent injury can cause serious complications. 1


Post-Resection Surveillance

  • Initial endoscopic surveillance for completely resected lesions should be undertaken at 6 months, as recurrence is often scarred and may require avulsion techniques. 1

  • After negative 6-month surveillance, repeat endoscopy at 1 year, then annually for 2-3 years if clear. 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.