What is the best treatment for a patient with a severe atrophied supraspinatus muscle, Hill-Sachs lesion, mild to moderate acromioclavicular and glenohumeral osteoarthrosis, and rotator cuff tendon tear, with a history of asbestos exposure?

Management of Severe Rotator Cuff Pathology with Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

This patient with severe supraspinatus atrophy, full-thickness rotator cuff tear, and glenohumeral osteoarthritis should be considered for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty rather than standard rotator cuff repair or total shoulder arthroplasty, as traditional TSA is contraindicated in the presence of irreparable rotator cuff tears. 1, 2

Primary Treatment Recommendation

The combination of severe supraspinatus muscle atrophy with glenohumeral osteoarthritis fundamentally changes the treatment algorithm from isolated rotator cuff disease management:

• Standard total shoulder arthroplasty should NOT be performed in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears, according to AAOS consensus guidelines 1, 2

• Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is the appropriate surgical option when both glenohumeral osteoarthritis and irreparable rotator cuff pathology coexist 2

• The severe supraspinatus atrophy described on imaging indicates an irreparable tear, as muscle quality (atrophy and fatty infiltration) directly affects healing capacity and functional outcomes after repair 1

Why Standard Rotator Cuff Repair is Not Appropriate

The presence of severe muscle atrophy creates a poor prognostic scenario:

• Preoperative supraspinatus muscle atrophy correlates with worse outcomes and healing after rotator cuff repair 1

• Severe atrophy indicates the tear is likely irreparable or at high risk for repair failure 1

• Even when repair healing occurs, fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles increases despite successful tendon repair 3

• Patients with less functional rotator cuff muscles are less likely to respond to conservative treatment and may need surgical intervention 4

Conservative Management is Unlikely to Succeed

While conservative treatment can be attempted initially, this patient's imaging findings predict poor response:

• Rotator cuff repair is an option for chronic, symptomatic full-thickness tears, but only when muscle quality is adequate 1

• Patients with well-preserved supraspinatus and infraspinatus function are the best candidates for conservative treatment 4

• This patient has severe atrophy, making conservative success unlikely 4

• Conservative options include exercise programs, though evidence is inconclusive for full-thickness tears 1

• Subacromial corticosteroid injections have inconclusive evidence, with one level II study showing no benefit over lidocaine alone 1

Addressing the Hill-Sachs Lesion

The Hill-Sachs lesion noted on imaging requires assessment but may not require specific treatment:

• Hill-Sachs lesions are associated with anterior shoulder instability and occur in up to 100% of patients with recurrent instability 5

• Treatment depends on whether the lesion is "engaging" during shoulder motion and whether instability symptoms are present 5

• If the shoulder remains stable during activities and the lesion is small/non-engaging, no specific treatment for the Hill-Sachs lesion is needed 5

• The primary pathology here is rotator cuff tear with osteoarthritis, not instability, so the Hill-Sachs lesion is likely an incidental finding

Surgical Algorithm

If proceeding with surgery:

• Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is indicated given the combination of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and irreparable rotator cuff tear 2

• Standard TSA would provide superior outcomes compared to hemiarthroplasty for the osteoarthritis component, but is contraindicated due to the rotator cuff pathology 1, 2

• Tendon transfers (latissimus dorsi or lower trapezius) could be considered in younger patients with irreparable tears and minimal arthritis, but are not appropriate when significant glenohumeral osteoarthritis is present 6

• Use mechanical and/or chemical VTE prophylaxis perioperatively 2

Critical Prognostic Factors

Several factors influence outcomes and should be discussed with the patient:

• Age affects outcomes, with one study showing older age associated with worse DASH scores at 2 years, though evidence is mixed 1

• Muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration negatively impact both tendon healing and clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair 1

• Workers' compensation status correlates with less favorable outcomes if applicable 1

• Surgeon volume matters—avoid surgeons performing fewer than 2 shoulder arthroplasties per year 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

• Do not attempt standard rotator cuff repair in the setting of severe muscle atrophy—healing rates are poor and functional outcomes compromised 1

• Do not perform standard TSA when irreparable rotator cuff tears are present—this is a consensus contraindication 1, 2

• Do not ignore the glenohumeral osteoarthritis component—this requires arthroplasty, not just rotator cuff management 2

• Shoulder arthroplasty complications occur in up to 39.8% of cases with revision rates up to 11% 2

• The asbestos exposure history is relevant for perioperative pulmonary risk assessment but does not change orthopedic management