Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency
Compression therapy with medical-grade gradient compression stockings (20-30 mmHg minimum) is the cornerstone of conservative management for chronic venous insufficiency, while endovenous thermal ablation (radiofrequency or laser) is first-line interventional treatment for patients with documented saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal junction reflux ≥500ms and vein diameter ≥4.5mm who fail a 3-month trial of conservative therapy. 1, 2, 3
Initial Diagnostic Evaluation
Before initiating any treatment, obtain duplex ultrasound to document:
- Reflux duration at saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) and saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ) - pathologic if ≥500 milliseconds 1, 3
- Exact vein diameter measurements at specific anatomic landmarks - critical for determining appropriate procedure 1, 2
- Deep venous system patency to rule out obstruction 3
- Location and extent of refluxing segments (great saphenous vein, small saphenous vein, accessory veins, perforators) 3
Common pitfall: Clinical presentation alone cannot determine medical necessity - objective ultrasound documentation is mandatory before any interventional therapy 2
Conservative Management (First-Line for All Patients)
Compression Therapy
- Prescribe medical-grade gradient compression stockings with 20-30 mmHg pressure for most patients, or 30-40 mmHg for more severe disease (CEAP C4-C6) 3, 4
- Compression must be worn consistently for at least 3 months with documented symptom persistence before interventional treatment is considered 1, 2
- For venous ulcers specifically, multilayer compression bandages show progressive benefit and remain the mainstay of treatment 3
- Evidence strength: Compression therapy reduces venous hypertension, increases venous flow velocity, and prevents leg swelling, with Level A evidence supporting its use 3, 4
Lifestyle Modifications
- Leg elevation above heart level when resting 3
- Regular exercise to improve calf muscle pump function 3
- Weight loss if applicable 3
- Avoid prolonged standing or sitting without movement 3
- Wear non-restrictive clothing 3
Pharmacologic Adjuncts
- Horse chestnut seed extract (containing aescin) may provide short-term symptomatic relief, though long-term studies are lacking and it is not FDA-approved 3, 5
- Diuretics and topical steroids reduce swelling and pain short-term but offer no long-term treatment advantage 5
- Flavonoid drugs (diosmiplex) show some benefit but limited availability in the United States 6
Interventional Treatment Algorithm
Patient Selection Criteria for Endovenous Thermal Ablation
All of the following must be documented:
- Duplex ultrasound within past 6 months showing reflux ≥500ms at SFJ or SPJ 1, 2
- Vein diameter ≥4.5mm measured at specific anatomic landmarks 1, 2
- Symptomatic venous insufficiency causing functional impairment (pain, heaviness, swelling, skin changes) 1, 2
- Failed 3-month trial of medical-grade compression stockings (20-30 mmHg) with documented symptom persistence 1, 2
Critical exception: For patients with venous ulceration (CEAP C5-C6), compression therapy trial is not required before referral for endovenous ablation - definitive treatment should not be delayed 1
Treatment Sequence Based on Vein Size and Location
For Main Saphenous Trunks (GSV/SSV) with Diameter ≥4.5mm:
Endovenous thermal ablation (radiofrequency or laser) is first-line treatment 1, 2, 3
- Technical success rates: 91-100% occlusion at 1 year 1, 2
- Advantages over surgery: similar efficacy, improved early quality of life, reduced hospital recovery, fewer complications (reduced bleeding, hematoma, wound infection, paresthesia) 1, 2
- Performed under ultrasound guidance with local anesthesia, same-day discharge 2
- Risks to counsel patients about: ~7% risk of temporary nerve damage from thermal injury, 0.3% risk of DVT, 0.1% risk of pulmonary embolism 1, 2
For Tributary Veins with Diameter 2.5-4.5mm:
Foam sclerotherapy (including Varithena/polidocanol) is appropriate as second-line or adjunctive treatment 1, 3
- Occlusion rates: 72-89% at 1 year 1
- Must be performed AFTER or concurrent with treatment of junctional reflux - treating tributaries alone without addressing SFJ/SPJ reflux leads to 20-28% recurrence at 5 years 1
- Common side effects: phlebitis, new telangiectasias, residual pigmentation, transient colic-like pain 1
- Rare complications: DVT (~0.3%), systemic sclerosant dispersion in high-flow situations 1
Critical pitfall: Vessels <2.5mm diameter have only 16% patency at 3 months with sclerotherapy - do not treat veins below this threshold 1
For Large Varicose Tributary Veins >4mm:
Ambulatory phlebectomy (stab phlebectomy) is appropriate adjunctive treatment 1, 3
- Must be performed concurrently with treatment of junctional reflux to prevent recurrence 1
- Updated techniques use small incisions to reduce scarring, blood loss, and complications 3
- Anatomic caution: Avoid common peroneal nerve near fibular head during lateral calf phlebectomy to prevent foot drop 1
For Telangiectasias and Small Vessels <2.5mm:
External laser thermal ablation or liquid sclerotherapy 3
- Fewer adverse effects compared to other modalities for these small vessels 3
Surgical Options (Third-Line)
Ligation and stripping reserved for cases where endovenous techniques are not feasible 3
- Typically limited to removal of superficial axial veins from groin to knee 3
- Higher complication rates compared to endovenous ablation 2
Treatment Approach Based on CEAP Classification
CEAP C2-C3 (Varicose Veins, Edema):
- 3-month trial of compression therapy required before intervention 1
- If symptoms persist despite compression, proceed with endovenous ablation for documented junctional reflux 1, 2
CEAP C4 (Skin Changes - Pigmentation, Eczema, Lipodermatosclerosis):
- Intervention required to prevent progression even without severe pain 1
- Compression therapy alone has inadequate evidence for C4 disease 1
- Proceed with endovenous ablation without prolonged conservative trial 1
CEAP C5-C6 (Healed or Active Venous Ulcer):
- Do not delay endovenous ablation for compression therapy trial 1
- Compression therapy remains essential for wound management but definitive treatment of underlying reflux promotes healing 1, 2
- Combined approach: multilayer compression for ulcer + endovenous ablation for reflux 3
Post-Procedure Management
- Post-procedure compression therapy essential to optimize outcomes and reduce complications 2
- Early postoperative duplex scan (2-7 days) mandatory to detect endovenous heat-induced thrombosis 1
- Longer-term imaging (3-6 months) needed to assess treatment success and identify residual incompetent segments requiring adjunctive therapy 1
Special Considerations
Post-Thrombotic Syndrome:
- Compression stockings (30-40 mmHg) recommended for 2 years 3
- Trial of intermittent compression device for severe cases not adequately relieved by stockings 3
Patients with Deep Venous Incompetency:
- More complex clinical picture that responds poorly to conservative management alone 2
- May still benefit from superficial venous ablation to reduce overall venous hypertension 2
Recurrent Varicose Veins After Prior Treatment:
- Serial ultrasound required to document new abnormalities or untreated segments 1
- Foam sclerotherapy appropriate for residual refluxing segments and tributary veins 1
- Repeat thermal ablation may be needed if initial treatment achieved incomplete obliteration 1
Strength of Evidence Summary
Highest quality evidence (Level A):
- Endovenous thermal ablation as first-line for documented junctional reflux 1, 2
- Compression therapy for conservative management 3, 4
- Treatment sequencing: thermal ablation before tributary sclerotherapy 1
Moderate quality evidence: