What are the criteria for a successful Foley catheter (indwelling urinary catheter) voiding trial?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

To be successful with a foley voiding trial, the catheter should be removed within 24 hours after surgery in the majority of cases, and individualized in patients with high risk of retention, as recommended by the ERAS society 1. This approach is crucial in minimizing the risk of urinary tract infections and ensuring the patient's bladder function returns to normal as soon as possible. When preparing for a foley voiding trial, it is essential to:

  • Explain the procedure to the patient and confirm they are medically stable
  • Remove the catheter at an appropriate time of day, typically morning, when staff is available to monitor progress
  • Encourage the patient to drink 1-2 liters of fluid over the next 4-6 hours to stimulate the bladder
  • Instruct the patient to void normally when they feel the urge and measure each voided volume
  • Monitor for symptoms of urinary retention such as discomfort, inability to void, or small, frequent voids
  • Consider medications that may help, such as alpha-blockers like tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily for men with prostatic obstruction, started 2-3 days before the trial, as suggested by general medical knowledge. Success is generally defined as voiding volumes of at least 200 ml with post-void residual volumes less than 100-150 ml, measured by bladder scanner or in-and-out catheterization 1. If the patient cannot void within 6-8 hours or has significant post-void residual volumes, the trial has failed and the catheter should be reinserted. It is also important to note that the use of indwelling urethral catheters should be avoided due to the risk of urinary tract infections, and if used, they should be assessed daily and removed as soon as possible 1. Additionally, a voiding diary, pad test, and non-invasive uroflow may be useful in evaluating patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, as suggested by the AUA/SUFU guideline 1. However, the most recent and highest quality study, the ERAS society recommendation 1, should be prioritized when making a definitive recommendation.

From the Research

Successful Foley Voiding Trial

To be successful with a Foley voiding trial, several factors should be considered:

  • The back fill technique, where the bladder is filled with 300 cc saline before the Foley catheter is removed, appears to be a better predictor of adequate postoperative bladder emptying than the auto fill technique 2.
  • A void of two-thirds or greater of total bladder volume at void 2 of the 2 voids is considered successful voiding 2.
  • The use of an ultrasound bladder scanner can be an alternative modality to catheterization for the measurement of post-void residual urine volume, with high correlation and specificity 3.
  • There is no significant difference in catheter burden between women who use an indwelling Foley catheter and those who use clean intermittent self-catheterization for management of postoperative voiding dysfunction after pelvic reconstructive surgery 4.

Post-Void Residual Urine Volume Measurement

The measurement of post-void residual urine volume is crucial in determining the success of a Foley voiding trial:

  • The gold standard assessment of post-void residual urine volume is bladder catheterization 3.
  • Ultrasound bladder scanners can provide accurate measurements of post-void residual urine volume, with a high correlation with catheterization measurements 3.
  • The optimal post-void residual volume at which intermittent catheterization should be recommended is not well-defined, and other measures such as bladder voiding efficiency or urodynamic parameters may be more relevant in guiding management decisions 5.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.