SGLT2 Inhibitors in Non-Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease
SGLT2 inhibitors are strongly recommended for adults with non-diabetic CKD who have eGFR ≥20 mL/min/1.73 m² and either albuminuria (ACR ≥200 mg/g) or heart failure, as they reduce kidney failure, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality regardless of diabetes status. 1
Risk-Stratified Recommendations
The 2024 BMJ guideline provides clear, risk-stratified recommendations for all adults with CKD, explicitly including those without diabetes 1:
- Very High Risk (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² with ACR ≥200 mg/g): Strong recommendation to administer SGLT2 inhibitors 1, 2
- High Risk (eGFR 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m² with ACR ≥200 mg/g): Strong recommendation to administer SGLT2 inhibitors 1, 2
- Moderate Risk (eGFR 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m² with ACR 30-200 mg/g): Weak recommendation in favor 1, 2
- Low Risk: Weak recommendation in favor 1
Specific Clinical Benefits in Non-Diabetic CKD
The evidence demonstrates substantial benefits independent of diabetes status 1, 3:
- Kidney protection: 39% reduction in composite kidney outcomes (≥50% sustained eGFR decline, ESKD, or renal death) 4, 5
- Mortality reduction: 52% reduction in all-cause mortality in non-diabetic CKD patients 4
- Cardiovascular protection: 21% reduction in cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization 4
- Absolute benefit: 58 fewer kidney failure events per 1000 very high-risk patients over 5 years 4
Initiation Criteria and Practical Algorithm
Step 1: Identify eligible patients 1, 2:
- eGFR ≥20 mL/min/1.73 m² AND
- Either ACR ≥200 mg/g (≥20 mg/mmol) OR heart failure (regardless of albuminuria level)
Step 2: Select appropriate agent 4, 6:
- Dapagliflozin 10 mg daily: FDA-approved for CKD with eGFR ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m² 6
- Empagliflozin or dapagliflozin: Preferred if concurrent heart failure 4
- Canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or empagliflozin: All three demonstrate consistent efficacy 4
Step 3: Initiate on background therapy 4:
- Start SGLT2 inhibitor on top of ACE inhibitor or ARB (if already prescribed) 4
- Do not delay SGLT2 inhibitor initiation waiting for ACE/ARB optimization 2
Critical Monitoring Expectations
Expect an initial reversible eGFR decline of 3-5 mL/min/1.73 m² within the first 4 weeks 4, 2. This is:
- A hemodynamic effect, not kidney injury 7
- Not a reason to discontinue therapy 2
- Associated with long-term kidney protection 7
Continue SGLT2 inhibitors even if eGFR falls below 20 mL/min/1.73 m² during treatment 2, 6. Once initiated, maintain therapy until dialysis initiation or intolerance develops 4, 6.
Safety Considerations and Contraindications
Absolute contraindications 6:
- Polycystic kidney disease (not expected to be effective) 6
- Patients requiring or with recent immunosuppressive therapy for kidney disease 6
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus (for glycemic control indication) 6
Temporary discontinuation required 2:
- Prolonged fasting, surgery, or critical illness (increased ketosis risk) 2
- Implement "sick day protocols" to hold during acute illness 4
- Genital mycotic infections (6% vs 1% placebo): counsel on proper hygiene 8
- Volume depletion: consider proactive diuretic dose reduction in high-risk patients 4
Combination Therapy Strategy
SGLT2 inhibitors provide additive benefits when combined with other nephroprotective agents 2, 9:
- With RAS inhibitors: Enhanced kidney protection demonstrated 2
- With nonsteroidal MRAs (finerenone): Consider for persistent albuminuria despite SGLT2 inhibitor and RAS inhibitor 2
- With GLP-1 receptor agonists: May reduce residual cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients 9
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not withhold SGLT2 inhibitors from non-diabetic CKD patients based on outdated diabetes-only indications 1
- Do not discontinue for initial eGFR dip of 3-5 mL/min/1.73 m² 4, 2
- Do not stop therapy when eGFR falls below initiation threshold during treatment 2, 6
- Do not delay initiation in patients meeting criteria, as benefits accrue over time 1
- Do not use for glycemic control alone when eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m² (ineffective for glucose lowering) 6
Populations Where Evidence is Limited
The following groups were excluded from major trials and require individualized assessment 2, 6: