Is Fucidin (fusidic acid) eye drop safe for use in infants?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 12, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Fusidic Acid Eye Drops in Infants: Safety Profile

Fusidic acid (Fucidin) eye drops are safe and effective for treating bacterial conjunctivitis in infants, with demonstrated efficacy in neonates as young as gestational age >32 weeks. 1

Evidence for Safety in Neonatal Population

The most relevant clinical evidence comes from a randomized controlled trial specifically evaluating fusidic acid eye drops in 456 newborns with acute bacterial conjunctivitis acquired within the first 28 days of life 1:

  • Inclusion criteria: Gestational age >32 weeks, acute conjunctivitis of suspected bacterial origin 1
  • Treatment regimen: Fusidic acid 1.0% applied twice daily for 7 days 1
  • Clinical cure rate: 89% of neonates treated with fusidic acid achieved cure, comparable to chloramphenicol (87.9%) 1
  • Safety profile: No significant adverse events were reported in this neonatal population 1

Dosing and Administration

For infants with bacterial conjunctivitis, fusidic acid 1% viscous eye drops should be administered as one drop twice daily for 7 days. 1, 2

The twice-daily dosing regimen offers significant practical advantages:

  • Superior compliance: 90.7% of patients used fusidic acid as instructed versus 78.0% with more frequent dosing regimens (p < 0.001) 1
  • Sustained drug levels: The carbomer vehicle provides long-lasting antibiotic concentration in tear fluid, enabling the convenient twice-daily application 3

Clinical Efficacy

Fusidic acid demonstrates robust antibacterial activity against common ocular pathogens:

  • Low resistance rates: Only 17% resistance among eye pathogens, compared to 58% for chloramphenicol and 41% for framycetin 4
  • Clinical success: 93% success rate in bacterial conjunctivitis versus 48% for chloramphenicol and 74% for framycetin (p ≤ 0.02) 4
  • Equivalent efficacy: Comparable clinical and bacteriologic outcomes to tobramycin in acute bacterial conjunctivitis 2

Prophylactic Use in Neonates

Fusidic acid has been studied for ophthalmia neonatorum prophylaxis, though evidence remains limited:

  • Emerging option: Described as "relatively new promising therapy" for neonatal ocular prophylaxis 5
  • Limited data: Insufficient evidence to recommend widespread prophylactic use at this time 5
  • Treatment indication: Current evidence supports therapeutic use rather than routine prophylaxis 5

Important Clinical Caveats

For infants under 32 weeks gestational age, safety data are lacking and specialist consultation is warranted before initiating treatment. 1

In pediatric cases under 7 years with ocular surface disorders, early discussion (<7 days) with ophthalmology is indicated before treatment is commenced. 6

The evidence does not support concerns about systemic absorption or toxicity in the infant population when fusidic acid is used topically for ocular infections 1. The favorable safety profile, combined with superior compliance due to twice-daily dosing, makes fusidic acid an appropriate first-line option for bacterial conjunctivitis in term and near-term infants.

References

Research

Treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis: 1% fusidic acid viscous drops vs. 0.3% tobramycin drops.

Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie, 2002

Research

Ophthalmia neonatorum: what kind of prophylaxis?

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 2011

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Related Questions

Can Fucithalmic (Fusidic acid) be used in children under 5 for bacterial conjunctivitis?
What is the dosage of Fusithalmic (fusidic acid) eyedrops for bacterial conjunctivitis?
What is the recommended frequency and duration of fusithalmic (fusidic acid) eyedrops for bacterial conjunctivitis in children under 5?
Can Fusithalmic (fusidic acid) be given to children aged 4 years and 1 year for bacterial conjunctivitis?
Can Fusithalmic (fusidic acid) treat bacterial conjunctivitis?
Are bioidentical estradiol sublingual tablets safe for use in female patients with menopausal symptoms or hormone deficiency?
Which testicular length measurement is likely correct for a male of reproductive age with oligospermia (sperm count of 56 million/ml) and a follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level of 9.9, after two ultrasounds 6 weeks apart showed different lengths of 4cm and 3.1cm?
What is the preferred initial imaging modality between a Computed Tomography (CT) urogram and a cystogram for a patient with persistent lower abdominal pain, microscopic hematuria, and a low Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/creatinine ratio?
Is portal hypertension a common complication in patients with cirrhosis or is it a sign of decompensation in patients with a history of liver dysfunction due to causes such as alcohol abuse, viral hepatitis, or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)?
What is the best course of action for a woman undergoing a cesarean section (CS) who experiences uncontrollable bleeding and requires a life-saving hysterectomy, but had only previously consented to the CS?
What is the cause and treatment for a 2-year history of tiny, pink bumps or spots on the palms of an adult's hands, which are sometimes itchy and have a stinging feeling, but not painful, with no significant past medical history?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.