What is the most common cause of elevated liver function tests (LFTs) in a previously healthy pregnant female in her 20's?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 12, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Most Common Cause of Elevated LFTs in Pregnant Women in Their 20s

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is the most common pregnancy-specific liver disease causing elevated LFTs in young pregnant women, affecting 0.4%-10% of pregnancies, with the highest prevalence (up to 5.6%) among Latina women in the United States. 1

However, the overall most common cause depends critically on trimester and clinical context, as the differential diagnosis shifts dramatically throughout pregnancy.

Epidemiological Context by Trimester

First Trimester:

  • Hyperemesis gravidarum causes abnormal LFTs in approximately 50% of affected patients and represents the most common cause of elevated transaminases in early pregnancy 2, 3
  • One prospective study found hyperemesis gravidarum accounted for 55.8% of abnormal LFTs in the first trimester 4

Second Trimester:

  • Viral hepatitis becomes the predominant cause, accounting for 47% of abnormal LFTs in one prospective series 4
  • Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) affects at least 10% of women of childbearing age and represents the most common chronic liver disease in this population 1

Third Trimester:

  • ICP is the most common pregnancy-specific cause, with 80% of cases presenting after 30 weeks gestation 1
  • HELLP syndrome (28.3%) and acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP, 14.8%) are also significant causes in the third trimester but less common than ICP 4

Key Diagnostic Algorithm

When evaluating elevated LFTs in a pregnant woman in her 20s, follow this systematic approach:

  1. Determine gestational age - This immediately narrows the differential diagnosis 5, 6

  2. Assess for pruritus - Generalized itching, especially on palms and soles without rash, strongly suggests ICP and warrants immediate bile acid measurement 1, 5

  3. Measure serum bile acids - Total bile acids >10 μmol/L (non-fasting) confirms ICP, with levels >40 μmol/L indicating increased fetal risk 1, 5

  4. Check blood pressure and proteinuria - Hypertension suggests preeclampsia spectrum disorders (preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome) rather than ICP 5, 7

  5. Evaluate platelet count and hemolysis markers - Low platelets with hemolysis indicates HELLP syndrome 2, 3

  6. Screen for viral hepatitis - Obtain HBsAg, anti-HCV, IgM anti-HEV, and IgM anti-HAV, especially in second trimester presentations 4

Critical Clinical Distinctions

ICP characteristics that distinguish it from other causes:

  • Classic symptom is generalized pruritus without rash, most severe on palms and soles 1
  • AST and ALT may be elevated 2-fold to 30-fold 1
  • Bile acids are the most sensitive diagnostic marker, with most women without ICP having levels <10 μmol/L 1
  • Postprandial bile acid measurements detect higher levels than fasting samples 1

MASLD as an underlying chronic condition:

  • The incidence of MASLD in women of childbearing age is at least 10%, making it the most common chronic liver disease in this demographic 1
  • MASLD increases risk of gestational diabetes (17% vs 7% in non-CLD pregnancies) and hypertensive complications (16% vs 3.8-3.9%) 1
  • Women with known MASLD require increased surveillance using appropriate national screening protocols 1

Important Caveats and Pitfalls

Do not assume normal pregnancy changes:

  • While alkaline phosphatase increases physiologically (up to 133-418 IU/L in third trimester), AST, ALT, bilirubin, and GGT should remain within non-pregnant reference ranges 5
  • Albumin decreases normally in pregnancy, but this does not indicate liver dysfunction 5

Do not delay bile acid measurement:

  • If initial bile acid testing is normal but pruritus persists, repeat testing is mandatory as pruritus can precede laboratory abnormalities 1, 5

Do not overlook medication history:

  • Obtain detailed history of prescribed, over-the-counter, and herbal products, as drug-induced liver injury remains an important consideration 5

Recognize the severity spectrum:

  • Abnormal LFTs occur in 3-5% of all pregnancies 2, 3, 6
  • Pregnancy-specific conditions account for approximately 57.6% of abnormal LFTs overall 4
  • Third trimester liver dysfunction carries the highest risk, with maternal mortality of 20.2% and perinatal mortality of 24.6% in severe cases 4

Management Implications

For confirmed ICP:

  • Offer ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for bile acids >40 μmol/L to treat maternal pruritus and reduce spontaneous preterm birth risk 1, 5
  • Plan delivery at 35 weeks for bile acids >100 μmol/L due to intrauterine fetal demise risk of 3.4% 1, 5
  • Continue UDCA throughout pregnancy as it is safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding 5

For MASLD:

  • Implement lifestyle modifications including dietary advice 1
  • Screen for gestational diabetes and hypertensive disease using appropriate national protocols 1
  • Encourage breastfeeding postpartum 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Liver disease in pregnancy.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2008

Research

[Liver diseases in pregnancy].

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2008

Research

Prospective evaluation of abnormal liver function tests in pregnancy.

Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation, 2005

Guideline

Management of Elevated Liver Function Tests in Pregnancy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Acute Liver Failure in Pregnancy: Diagnostic Approach and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.