MRI Safety in Patients with Implantable Loop Recorders
Yes, MRI head scanning can be safely performed in patients with implantable loop recorders (ILRs), though specific precautions must be followed and artifacts mimicking arrhythmias are common. 1, 2
Safety Profile and Evidence
ILRs can undergo MRI without harm to the patient or permanent device damage. Multiple studies demonstrate that MRI scanning of ILR patients (specifically the Reveal Plus model) has been performed safely without device malfunction, altered programming, diminished battery status, or patient symptoms such as device heating or movement. 1, 2
Key Safety Findings:
- No permanent damage to device functionality has been documented 1, 2
- No changes in programmed parameters or signal integrity 1
- No patient symptoms of device tugging or warmth at implant site 1
- Device communication and reprogramming capability remain intact 1
Critical Pre-MRI Protocol
Before proceeding with MRI, the ILR memory must be cleared and baseline parameters verified. 1, 2
Required Steps:
- Clear the ILR memory moments before the scan 1, 2
- Verify signal integrity and time-date stamp 1
- Ensure the device has been implanted for at least 6 weeks to allow position stabilization 3, 4
- Confirm no abandoned or epicardial leads are present 3, 4
Post-MRI Device Management
Immediate device interrogation after MRI is mandatory to verify function and identify artifacts. 1, 2
Post-Scan Requirements:
- Reinterrogate the device immediately after MRI completion (or within 2 days maximum) 1
- Compare all parameters to baseline measurements 1
- Question the patient regarding any symptoms experienced during scanning 1
Critical Artifact Warning
Artifacts mimicking both tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias occur frequently during MRI and must be distinguished from true arrhythmic events. 1, 2, 5
Artifact Characteristics:
- Both wide and narrow complex tachycardias can be mimicked 5
- Bradyarrhythmias may also appear as artifacts 1
- Artifacts occur regardless of MRI scan type (cranial, lumbar, shoulder, knee) 1, 2
- These artifacts must be excluded to avoid mistakenly attributing syncopal episodes or palpitations to false arrhythmias 1
Anatomical Considerations for Head MRI
Head/cranial MRI poses lower risk compared to scans closer to the device location. The closer the scanning area is to the implanted system, the higher the risk of electromagnetic interference. 3 Since ILRs are typically implanted in the chest wall and head MRI involves scanning a distant anatomical region, this represents a favorable scenario.
Distance-Related Safety:
- Cranial MRI has been performed safely in ILR patients 1, 5
- One study noted artifacts during shoulder MRI but not cranial MRI in the same patient 5
- The distance from the device to the scanning field reduces electromagnetic interference risk 3
Comparison to Other Cardiac Devices
ILRs have a more favorable MRI safety profile than pacemakers or ICDs. 4, 6
Key Distinctions:
- Conventional pacemakers carry only Class IIb recommendations for MRI (less favorable benefit-risk ratio) and require mandatory electrophysiology consultation 4, 6
- The American Society of Anesthesiologists states MRI is generally contraindicated in patients with cardiac rhythm management devices 3
- ILRs lack the transvenous leads that create the primary safety concerns with pacemakers and ICDs 7, 6
Clinical Context and Diagnostic Value
The diagnostic benefit of MRI in patients with syncope or neurological symptoms typically outweighs the minimal risks associated with ILR presence. 3, 8
Supporting Evidence:
- Up to 75% of patients with cardiac devices develop an indication for MRI due to medical comorbidities 3
- In stroke/TIA patients, MRI of the brain is recommended to confirm diagnosis 3
- ILRs are used in complex patients where extensive investigations have not yielded a diagnosis 8
Practical Implementation
Coordinate with the device manufacturer, ordering physician, and MRI facility before proceeding. 3, 4