What is the next step in evaluating a patient with an elevated D-dimer (D-dimer test) level of 995, presenting with symptoms such as leg swelling, chest pain, or shortness of breath, and potentially at risk for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) or Pulmonary Embolism (PE)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 13, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Evaluation of D-Dimer 995

A D-dimer of 995 ng/mL (or μg/L) is elevated and requires clinical probability assessment followed by imaging—never use this positive result alone to diagnose venous thromboembolism (VTE). 1

Immediate Clinical Probability Assessment

You must first stratify the patient's pretest probability using a validated clinical decision rule before proceeding with imaging:

Wells Score for DVT (if leg swelling is the primary concern): 2

  • Active cancer (treatment ongoing or within 6 months): +1 point
  • Paralysis/recent immobilization of lower extremity: +1 point
  • Recently bedridden >3 days or major surgery within 12 weeks: +1 point
  • Localized tenderness along deep venous system: +1 point
  • Entire leg swelling: +1 point
  • Calf swelling >3 cm compared to asymptomatic leg: +1 point
  • Pitting edema confined to symptomatic leg: +1 point
  • Collateral superficial veins: +1 point
  • Previously documented DVT: +1 point
  • Alternative diagnosis at least as likely as DVT: -2 points

Revised Geneva Score for PE (if chest pain/shortness of breath predominates): 2

  • Previous PE or DVT: +3 points
  • Heart rate 75-94 bpm: +3 points; ≥95 bpm: +5 points
  • Surgery or fracture within past month: +2 points
  • Hemoptysis: +2 points
  • Active cancer: +2 points
  • Unilateral lower limb pain: +3 points
  • Pain on deep venous palpation and unilateral edema: +4 points
  • Age >65 years: +1 point

Management Algorithm Based on Clinical Probability

Low Clinical Probability (Wells ≤1 or Geneva 0-3)

With your elevated D-dimer of 995 ng/mL, proceed directly to imaging: 1

  • For suspected DVT: Order proximal compression ultrasound or whole-leg ultrasound 1
  • For suspected PE: Order CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) 2, 3
  • If imaging is negative, no anticoagulation is needed and the 3-month thromboembolic risk is only 0.14% 1

Intermediate Clinical Probability (Wells 2 or Geneva 4-10)

Proceed directly to imaging—do not repeat D-dimer: 1

  • For suspected DVT: Whole-leg ultrasound preferred over proximal-only ultrasound 1
  • For suspected PE: CTPA is the imaging modality of choice 2

High Clinical Probability (Wells ≥3 or Geneva ≥11)

Proceed directly to imaging without any D-dimer consideration: 2

  • The D-dimer result is irrelevant in high-risk patients 2, 3
  • Order CTPA for PE or compression ultrasound for DVT immediately 2

Critical Interpretation Points for D-Dimer 995

This level is approximately 2 times the standard cutoff of 500 ng/mL, which confirms the need for imaging but does not confirm VTE. 1 The positive predictive value of D-dimer is only 35-50% due to poor specificity. 1

Age-Adjusted Consideration

If the patient is >50 years old, use the age-adjusted cutoff (age × 10 ng/mL): 2, 1

  • For a 60-year-old: cutoff would be 600 ng/mL
  • For a 70-year-old: cutoff would be 700 ng/mL
  • For an 80-year-old: cutoff would be 800 ng/mL
  • For a 100-year-old: cutoff would be 1000 ng/mL

If the patient is >99 years old, this D-dimer of 995 would actually be below the age-adjusted threshold and could potentially exclude VTE in low clinical probability patients. 1 However, for patients <99 years old, this level remains elevated and requires imaging.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Never initiate anticoagulation based on elevated D-dimer alone—confirmation with imaging is mandatory. 1 Even markedly elevated D-dimer cannot diagnose VTE without imaging confirmation. 1

Recognize populations where D-dimer has limited utility: 1

  • Hospitalized patients (number needed to test increases from 3 to >10)
  • Post-surgical patients (tissue injury causes persistent elevation for >14 days) 4
  • Pregnant women
  • Cancer patients
  • Patients with sepsis/DIC
  • Patients post-cardiac arrest or CPR 5
  • Patients with massive bleeding 5

In these populations, D-dimer may be elevated regardless of VTE status, but you still must proceed with imaging if clinical suspicion warrants. 1

Non-Thrombotic Causes of D-Dimer 995

While proceeding with VTE workup, consider alternative diagnoses that can cause this level of elevation: 5

  • Sepsis with DIC (sensitivity 94-100% within 24 hours) 1
  • Recent major trauma or surgery 4
  • Active malignancy 1, 5
  • Recent massive bleeding 5
  • Post-CPR status 5
  • HELLP syndrome 5

However, thromboembolic disease remains the most common cause (43% in one series of very high D-dimers), so imaging to exclude VTE takes priority. 5

If Imaging is Negative

No anticoagulation is warranted when imaging is negative, regardless of the elevated D-dimer. 1 The negative predictive value of normal imaging effectively excludes clinically significant thromboembolism with a 3-month risk of only 0.14%. 1

For persistent symptoms despite negative initial imaging, consider repeat ultrasound in 5-7 days to detect potential propagation of below-knee DVT, as one-sixth of distal DVTs extend proximally. 2, 1

References

Guideline

D-Dimer Testing in Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism in Low-Risk Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Effect of tissue injury on D-Dimer levels: a prospective study in trauma patients.

Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2002

Research

Can very high level of D-dimer exclusively predict the presence of thromboembolic diseases?

Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2011

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.