What is the latest approach to assessing sepsis severity in a patient presenting with sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 13, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Latest Sepsis Severity Score

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is the current gold standard for assessing sepsis severity in ICU patients, with a score increase of ≥2 points defining sepsis and higher scores predicting mortality. 1, 2

Primary Severity Assessment Tool

Use the SOFA score as your primary tool for quantifying sepsis severity in the ICU setting. 1 The SOFA score evaluates six organ systems:

  • Respiratory system: PaO2/FiO2 ratio (scores 1-4 based on severity, with mechanical ventilation requirements) 1
  • Coagulation: Platelet count (1 point for <150,000/μL up to 4 points for <20,000/μL) 1
  • Hepatic function: Bilirubin levels (1 point for 1.2-1.9 mg/dL up to 4 points for >12.0 mg/dL) 1
  • Cardiovascular: Mean arterial pressure and vasopressor requirements (1 point for MAP <70 mmHg up to 4 points for high-dose vasopressors) 1
  • Neurological: Glasgow Coma Scale (1 point for GCS 13-14 up to 4 points for GCS <6) 1
  • Renal function: Creatinine levels or urine output (1 point for 1.2-1.9 mg/dL up to 4 points for >5.0 mg/dL) 1

Clinical Application and Prognostic Value

Calculate SOFA scores serially, not just at admission, as evolving organ dysfunction strongly predicts outcome. 1, 3 The score demonstrates excellent prognostic accuracy:

  • Day 3 SOFA score shows the highest discrimination for mortality (AUC 0.84 for in-hospital mortality) 4, 3
  • An increase of ≥2 points from baseline is associated with >10% in-hospital mortality, defining sepsis 2
  • Cumulative SOFA scores outperform single-day assessments for predicting outcomes 3

Complementary Screening Tool: qSOFA

For initial rapid screening outside the ICU or in emergency settings, use the quick SOFA (qSOFA) score, though it has lower sensitivity than SOFA 2:

  • Respiratory rate ≥22/min 2
  • Altered mental status 2
  • Systolic blood pressure ≤100 mmHg 2

A qSOFA score ≥2 identifies patients requiring full SOFA assessment and closer monitoring, but qSOFA should never replace SOFA for severity assessment in ICU patients 1, 2

Alternative Screening: NEWS2 Score

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2024 guidelines recommend NEWS2 for initial sepsis screening and monitoring, particularly in non-ICU settings 5, 6:

  • NEWS2 ≥7 indicates high risk requiring evaluation every 30 minutes 5, 6
  • NEWS2 5-6 indicates moderate risk requiring hourly evaluation 5, 6
  • NEWS2 demonstrates superior sensitivity (84-86%) compared to qSOFA (28-42%) for early sepsis detection 5

Biomarker Integration

Combine SOFA scoring with serum lactate levels for enhanced prognostic accuracy 6, 7:

  • Lactate >2 mmol/L with vasopressor requirement defines septic shock (>40% mortality) 2
  • Lactate shows strong correlation with SOFA scores (correlation coefficient 0.883) and excellent mortality prediction (AUC 0.996) 7
  • Procalcitonin ≥1.5 ng/mL has 100% sensitivity and 72% specificity for sepsis in ICU patients 6

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not rely on qSOFA alone in ICU settings - it was designed for screening, not severity assessment, and has poor sensitivity (28-42%) compared to SOFA 1, 5

Do not use only admission SOFA scores - serial measurements at 24,48, and 72 hours provide superior prognostic information, with day 3 scores showing the best discrimination 4, 3

Always interpret scores in clinical context - neurological and cardiovascular dysfunction are independent mortality risk factors even when total SOFA scores are moderate 3

Recognize that SOFA may underestimate severity in young patients without comorbidities who develop severe respiratory failure, as hypoxia alone may not generate sufficiently high scores 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.