What is the significance and application of the Sofa (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score in assessing organ dysfunction in a critically ill adult patient?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 13, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

SOFA Score: Clinical Significance and Application in Critical Care

What is the SOFA Score?

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is a validated 24-point scoring system that evaluates dysfunction across six organ systems (respiratory, cardiovascular, brain, liver, kidney, hemostasis), with each system scored 0-4 points, where higher scores indicate worse organ dysfunction and increased mortality risk. 1, 2, 3

The score was originally developed in 1996 to describe organ dysfunction in critically ill adults in a readily quantifiable and sequential manner, though it has recently been updated to SOFA-2 to reflect contemporary clinical practice. 2, 3

Core Components and Scoring

Each organ system is scored from 0 (normal function) to 4 (severe dysfunction): 1, 4, 3

  • Respiratory system: Assessed via PaO2/FiO2 ratio, ranging from 0 (≥400 mmHg) to 4 (<100 mmHg with mechanical ventilation) 1
  • Cardiovascular system: Evaluated through mean arterial pressure and vasopressor requirements, from 0 (MAP ≥70 mmHg) to 4 (high-dose norepinephrine or epinephrine) 1
  • Brain (neurological): Measured using Glasgow Coma Scale, from 0 (GCS 15) to 4 (GCS <6) 4
  • Liver (hepatic): Assessed via bilirubin levels, from 0 (<20 μmol/L or <1.2 mg/dL) to 4 (>204 μmol/L or >12.0 mg/dL) 1, 4
  • Kidney (renal): Evaluated through creatinine levels and urine output, from 0 (<110 μmol/L) to 4 (>440 μmol/L or >5.0 mg/dL, or <200 mL/day urine output) 1, 4
  • Hemostasis (coagulation): Measured by platelet count, from 0 (≥150 × 10³/μL) to 4 (<20 × 10³/μL) 1, 4

Clinical Significance by Score Range

The SOFA score provides critical prognostic information based on the total score: 1

  • SOFA 0-6: Relatively low mortality risk in general ICU populations 1
  • SOFA 7-10: Significant multi-organ dysfunction with substantially increased mortality risk 1
  • SOFA >10: Predicts mortality exceeding 80-90% 1, 5
  • SOFA >11: Associated with >90% mortality 1, 6

A critical threshold is a SOFA score increase of ≥2 points from baseline in the presence of documented or suspected infection, which defines sepsis according to Sepsis-3 criteria and triggers immediate intervention. 1, 7

Primary Clinical Applications

1. Sepsis Diagnosis and Management

When a patient with documented or suspected infection has a SOFA score increase of ≥2 points from baseline, this meets sepsis criteria and mandates: 1

  • Immediate broad-spectrum antibiotics within 1 hour 1
  • Aggressive fluid resuscitation targeting adequate perfusion 1
  • Source control measures 1
  • Consider corticosteroids (hydrocortisone) if septic shock develops (MAP <65 mmHg despite fluids, lactate >2 mmol/L) 4

2. Sequential Monitoring and Prognostication

Calculate SOFA score on ICU admission using the most abnormal values from the first 24 hours, then reassess every 48-72 hours throughout the ICU stay to track disease progression and treatment response. 1, 4, 8

The trajectory of SOFA scores provides crucial prognostic information: 8

  • Decreasing scores: Associated with improved survival (33% of survivors vs. 21% of non-survivors showed decreasing scores) 8
  • Increasing scores: Associated with mortality (44% of non-survivors vs. 20% of survivors showed increasing scores) 8
  • Maximum SOFA score: The highest SOFA score achieved during ICU stay is the strongest predictor of mortality (AUC 0.91 in COVID-19 patients) 5

3. Coagulopathy Screening in Sepsis

Screen all septic patients for coagulopathy using the Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (SIC) scoring system, which incorporates SOFA score ≥2 as one component. 4 A SIC score ≥4 indicates early coagulopathy requiring closer monitoring. 4

4. Mass Casualty and Pandemic Triage

During resource-limited scenarios, SOFA scores guide triage decisions: 6

  • SOFA >11: Patients receive palliative care and are discharged from critical care (mortality >90%) 6
  • SOFA 8-11: Intermediate priority, reassess at 48 and 120 hours 6
  • SOFA ≤7: Highest priority for ICU admission 6

Critical Limitations and Pitfalls

Do Not Use SOFA Alone for Triage in Non-Pandemic Settings

SOFA lacks validation for resource allocation at low scores and should not be used as the sole criterion for triage decisions in routine clinical practice. 1 It is a tool to augment, not replace, clinical judgment. 4

SOFA Does Not Account for Age or Comorbidities

Unlike APACHE II scoring systems, SOFA does not consider patient age or pre-existing comorbidities, which limits its prognostic accuracy in certain populations. 1, 4, 7

Early SOFA Scores May Be Misleading

Evaluation of SOFA scores in the first 48 hours after ICU admission is not a reliable prognostic indicator, particularly in COVID-19 patients. 5 The maximum SOFA score achieved during the ICU stay is more predictive of mortality than admission scores. 5

Do Not Assume Sepsis Based on SOFA Alone

A SOFA score of ≥2 does not define sepsis without documented or suspected infection. 4 The clinical context of infection must be present. 4

SOFA Has Lower Predictive Value Than APACHE II

For mortality prediction in certain populations (e.g., complicated intra-abdominal infections), SOFA has lower discriminatory ability (AUC 0.75) compared to APACHE II (AUC 0.81). 7

Practical Management Algorithm

Step 1: Calculate Baseline SOFA Score

Use the most abnormal values from the first 24 hours of ICU admission. 1

Step 2: Interpret Initial Score

  • SOFA 0-6: Low-moderate risk; provide standard ICU care 1
  • SOFA 7-10: High risk; intensify monitoring and organ support 1
  • SOFA >11: Extremely high mortality risk (>90%); discuss goals of care and appropriateness of invasive interventions versus palliative measures 4

Step 3: Assess for Sepsis

If SOFA increased ≥2 points from baseline AND infection is documented or suspected, initiate sepsis bundle immediately. 1

Step 4: Serial Reassessment

Recalculate SOFA every 48-72 hours to monitor disease trajectory: 1, 8

  • Static or increasing scores: Signal treatment failure requiring escalation of care 4
  • Decreasing scores: Indicate treatment response and improved prognosis 8

Step 5: Track Maximum SOFA Score

The highest SOFA score achieved during ICU stay provides the most accurate mortality prediction. 5

Special Considerations

Research and Audit Applications

SOFA is valuable for research purposes, audit, and comparing outcomes across different ICU populations. 1, 4 When using SOFA as a research endpoint, clearly define primary outcomes (mortality, organ dysfunction, length of stay) and establish standardized protocols for collecting physiological parameters. 1

SOFA-2 Updates

The recently developed SOFA-2 score incorporates contemporary organ support treatments and revised thresholds based on data from 3.34 million patients across diverse geographical settings. 2, 3 The updated score maintains the same six organ systems but includes new variables and modified cutoff thresholds to better reflect current clinical practice. 2, 3

Gastrointestinal and Immune Systems Not Included

Despite attempts to incorporate gastrointestinal and immune dysfunction, these systems could not be included in SOFA-2 due to insufficient data, complexity, and lack of content validity. 4, 2, 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.