What is the Midas trial for a patient with myasthenia gravis (MG)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 13, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

The MIDAS Trial for Post-Stroke Fatigue

The MIDAS (Modafinil in Debilitating Fatigue After Stroke) trial is a phase II randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial investigating modafinil 200 mg daily for treating persistent fatigue in ischemic stroke survivors, though this trial is unrelated to myasthenia gravis. 1

Trial Design and Population

The MIDAS trial enrolled stroke survivors with:

  • Average score ≥12 across all domains of the Multi-dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) 1
  • Ischemic stroke diagnosed more than 6 months prior to enrollment 1
  • Projected sample size of 36 participants 1

Intervention Protocol

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either modafinil 200 mg daily or placebo for 6 weeks, followed by a crossover period where treatments were switched. 1

The trial utilized a single-center, prospective design with three assessment timepoints: baseline, crossover, and study conclusion 1

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome

  • Improvement in fatigue measured by the MFI-20 1

Secondary Outcomes

  • Changes in Fatigue Severity Scale scores 1
  • Cognitive function assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment 1
  • Mood changes measured by Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale 1
  • Stroke-specific quality of life scores 1

Neuroimaging Assessments

All participants underwent MRI at three timepoints to measure:

  • Cerebral blood flow using arterial spin labelling 1
  • Brain activity on resting state functional MRI 1

Context Within Post-Stroke Fatigue Research

A 2023 systematic review identified MIDAS as one of only 10 published completed trials (enrolling 616 total participants across all studies) examining pharmacological interventions for post-stroke fatigue, with 5 additional publications reporting secondary analyses of the MIDAS trial specifically. 2

The systematic review concluded that there is currently insufficient evidence to support any particular pharmacological treatment for post-stroke fatigue or to recommend changes in clinical practice. 2

Current Evidence Limitations

  • Small sample sizes across all post-stroke fatigue trials 2
  • Treatment duration ranging only 28 days to 3 months in published studies 2
  • Insufficient data on long-term follow-up outcomes 2
  • Most trials measured fatigue only at treatment end, not weeks or months after 2

Important Distinction for Myasthenia Gravis

This MIDAS trial should not be confused with myasthenia gravis management, as it specifically addresses post-stroke fatigue and has no relevance to neuromuscular junction disorders. The evidence provided shows no connection between the MIDAS stroke fatigue trial and myasthenia gravis treatment 1

For myasthenia gravis patients, the standard approach involves pyridostigmine as first-line therapy (30-120 mg orally up to four times daily), with escalation to corticosteroids showing 66-85% positive response rates when needed 3, 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Myasthenia Gravis Diagnostic and Management Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Fatigue and Nystagmus in Myasthenia Gravis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.