Indications for Pancreatic Stenting in Pancreatic Divisum
Pancreatic stenting in pancreatic divisum is indicated specifically for patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis (at least 2 documented episodes) who have radiologic evidence of dorsal duct outflow obstruction, such as dilated dorsal pancreatic duct or santorinicele. 1, 2
Key Patient Selection Criteria
The following patients should be considered for stenting:
- Patients with documented recurrent acute pancreatitis (≥2 episodes) and confirmed pancreatic divisum on imaging 2, 3
- Radiologic evidence of outflow obstruction (dilated dorsal duct and/or santorinicele) 1, 2
- All other causes of pancreatitis have been excluded 3
- Imaging performed 2-6 weeks after acute episode resolution to avoid inflammatory changes 2
Important caveat: The vast majority (90-94%) of patients with pancreatic divisum remain asymptomatic throughout their lives and require no intervention. 2
Who Should NOT Receive Stenting
Stenting is contraindicated or inappropriate in:
- Asymptomatic patients with incidentally discovered pancreatic divisum 2
- Patients with chronic pain alone without documented episodes of acute pancreatitis 2
- Patients without objective radiologic signs of dorsal duct obstruction (poor response rates) 2
Stenting Technique and Duration
Contemporary approach prioritizes minor papilla sphincterotomy over stenting alone:
- Minor papilla sphincterotomy is the preferred definitive treatment 1, 2
- Stent placement alone is NOT recommended as definitive therapy because it fails to produce durable reshaping of the dorsal drainage system 1, 2
- When stents are used, they should be temporary (typically 5-7 Fr stents placed for 2-3 month intervals) 4
- Stenting alone requires frequent exchanges and carries risks of migration, occlusion, and ductal injury 1, 2
Evidence Supporting Stenting
The only randomized controlled trial demonstrated significant benefit: patients with pancreatic divisum and recurrent acute pancreatitis who received minor papilla stenting had substantially fewer future pancreatitis episodes (10% vs 67% in controls). 1, 3 However, this evidence is limited to a single small trial, and an ongoing international multicenter randomized sham-controlled trial should provide more definitive guidance. 1, 2
Risk-Benefit Considerations
Procedural risks include:
- Post-ERCP pancreatitis risk: 10-15% 1, 2
- Post-papillotomy stenosis: up to 19% 2
- Stent migration (both proximal and distal) 5
- Dorsal duct changes of unknown clinical significance 4
Special Clinical Scenarios
For chronic pancreatitis with pancreatic divisum:
- Surgical intervention (longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy) provides better long-term outcomes for pain relief and quality of life compared to endoscopic therapy 1, 6
- Endoscopic stenting may provide temporary benefit in chronic pancreatitis patients, with approximately one-third remaining symptom-free after a single stenting episode 7
- Intensive pancreatic endotherapy with repeated stenting sessions (mean 2.6 sessions) achieved 95.7% success in patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic divisum 8
For pancreatic duct ectasia due to chronic pancreatitis: