Is a blighted ovum (miscarriage due to failed embryo development) included in the calculation of recurrent abortions when deciding on the workup for a patient with recurrent pregnancy loss?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 13, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Is Blighted Ovum Counted in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Workup?

Yes, blighted ovum (now termed anembryonic pregnancy) is counted when calculating recurrent pregnancy losses for workup purposes, as it represents a confirmed early pregnancy loss that meets diagnostic criteria for failed pregnancy. 1

Modern Terminology and Classification

The term "blighted ovum" is now obsolete and should be replaced with "anembryonic pregnancy" or "early pregnancy loss (EPL) - diagnostic of" according to current radiological and obstetric guidelines. 1, 2 This terminology change reflects a more precise understanding of the condition while maintaining clinical utility for classification purposes.

An anembryonic pregnancy is specifically defined as:

  • A gestational sac measuring ≥25 mm without an embryo, OR
  • Absence of an embryo on serial examinations obtained at appropriate discriminatory time intervals 1

Inclusion in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Definition

All types of confirmed early pregnancy losses, including anembryonic pregnancies, are counted toward the diagnosis of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). 3, 4 The current definition of RPL is two or more consecutive pregnancy losses before 20-24 weeks of gestation, which explicitly includes both embryonic and fetal losses. 5, 6

The key requirement is that the pregnancy must be clinically recognized (confirmed by ultrasound or hCG) to be counted. 5 An anembryonic pregnancy meets this criterion because:

  • It demonstrates an intrauterine gestational sac on ultrasound 1
  • It represents a confirmed conception that failed to develop properly 1
  • It requires the same diagnostic workup as other forms of early pregnancy loss 3, 4

When to Initiate RPL Workup

Begin comprehensive evaluation after two or more pregnancy losses, including anembryonic pregnancies. 7, 8 While some older definitions required three losses, current practice recognizes that two losses warrant investigation, particularly given:

  • The psychological burden on couples 5
  • The potential for treatable underlying causes 7, 9
  • The improved prognosis with early intervention 3

Clinical Implications

The inclusion of anembryonic pregnancies in RPL counts is clinically important because:

Genetic factors: Some patients with recurrent anembryonic pregnancies (particularly recurrent complete hydatidiform moles) may have mutations in NLRP7 and KHDC3L genes, representing a specific autosomal recessive condition (familial recurrent hydatidiform mole). 1, 3, 4 These patients require genetic counseling and may benefit from ovum donation rather than conventional IVF. 1

Chromosomal abnormalities: Anembryonic pregnancies frequently result from chromosomal errors (50-60% of early losses), the same underlying mechanism as other forms of early pregnancy loss. 2, 5

Anatomical and endocrine factors: Uterine cavity abnormalities, endocrine dysfunction, and other treatable causes can manifest as anembryonic pregnancies. 4, 9

Common Pitfall to Avoid

Do not exclude anembryonic pregnancies from your loss count when determining whether to pursue RPL workup. This outdated practice may delay diagnosis of treatable conditions and prolong the couple's distress. 6, 5 All confirmed intrauterine pregnancy losses, regardless of whether an embryo was visualized, should be included in the total count for RPL evaluation. 1, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Aborto: Etiología, Clasificación, Características Clínicas, Diagnóstico y Tratamiento

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Genetic and Anatomical Factors in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Recurrent pregnancy loss.

Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2020

Research

Recurrent first trimester pregnancy loss: revised definitions and novel causes.

Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity, 2009

Research

An update in recurrent spontaneous abortion.

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2005

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.