How do I interpret a bone density test for a patient with a history of fractures, family history of osteoporosis, and medications such as glucocorticoids or anticonvulsants, considering their age, sex, and ethnicity?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 13, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

How to Interpret a Bone Density Test

Interpret bone density using T-scores for adults ≥50 years (osteoporosis = T-score ≤-2.5) and Z-scores for younger adults (low bone mass = Z-score ≤-2.0), while integrating FRAX calculations and clinical risk factors—particularly prior fractures, glucocorticoid use, and family history—to guide treatment decisions rather than relying on BMD values alone. 1, 2

Understanding the Scoring Systems

T-Score Interpretation (Adults ≥50 Years)

  • T-score ≤-2.5 at the femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine establishes the diagnosis of osteoporosis 1, 3
  • T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 indicates osteopenia (low bone mass) 1
  • T-score ≥-1.0 represents normal bone density 1
  • T-scores measure the number of standard deviations below the mean BMD for healthy young adults and represent current fracture risk 4

Z-Score Interpretation (Adults <40-50 Years)

  • Z-score ≤-2.0 is defined as "low BMD for chronological age" or "below the expected range for age" 1
  • Z-score >-2.0 is "within the expected range for age" 1
  • Use Z-scores rather than T-scores in younger adults to detect secondary causes of bone loss 3
  • Z-scores compare BMD to age-matched controls and measure fracture risk relative to peers 4

Critical Clinical Context Integration

Prior Fractures (Highest Priority)

  • Any fragility fracture after age 50 is diagnostic of osteoporosis regardless of BMD and is the strongest predictor of future fractures 3
  • Presence of any prevalent fracture increases relative risk for future fractures by approximately 2-fold or more 5
  • Self-reported but undocumented prior vertebral fracture warrants vertebral fracture assessment if T-score <-1.0 1

Glucocorticoid Use Adjustments

  • Adjust FRAX calculations by multiplying major osteoporotic fracture risk by 1.15 and hip fracture risk by 1.2 if prednisone dose >7.5 mg/day 1
  • For patients on ≥7.5 mg/day prednisone equivalent for ≥3 months, consider treatment at higher BMD thresholds 1
  • Very high-dose glucocorticoids (prednisone ≥30 mg/day, cumulative dose >0.5 gm/year) require more aggressive monitoring and earlier treatment 1

Family History Impact

  • Family history of hip fracture (particularly parental) is a major risk factor that should lower your treatment threshold 1
  • This factor is incorporated into FRAX calculations but should be explicitly documented 2

FRAX Integration for Treatment Decisions

When to Use FRAX

  • Calculate 10-year fracture probability using FRAX for all adults ≥40 years with risk factors or osteopenia 1, 2
  • FRAX is particularly valuable in patients with osteopenia (T-score -1.0 to -2.5) to determine if pharmacologic treatment is warranted 2
  • Include BMD in FRAX calculation when available, as this improves predictive accuracy 2

Treatment Thresholds

  • Recommend treatment if 10-year risk of hip fracture ≥3% OR major osteoporotic fracture ≥20% 2, 3
  • These thresholds apply to adults ≥40 years not already on treatment 2
  • FRAX is not validated for adults <40 years; use clinical risk assessment with BMD testing instead 2

Age-Specific Interpretation Algorithms

Adults ≥65 Years

  • Screen all women ≥65 years and men ≥70 years regardless of other risk factors 1
  • Treatment decisions should integrate T-scores, FRAX calculations, and clinical risk factors 1, 2
  • Consider Z-scores when evaluating for secondary causes of bone loss even in this age group 3

Adults 40-64 Years

  • Perform BMD testing if one major risk factor (prior fracture, family history of hip fracture, glucocorticoid use) or two minor risk factors exist 1, 5
  • Use FRAX with BMD to guide treatment decisions 1, 2
  • Minor risk factors include low body mass index, low calcium intake, alcohol consumption ≥3 units/day, and smoking 1

Adults <40 Years

  • Use Z-scores, not T-scores, for interpretation 1, 3
  • Perform BMD testing only if history of osteoporotic fracture, Z-score <-3, >10%/year BMD loss, very high-dose glucocorticoids, or other significant risk factors 1
  • Focus on identifying secondary causes of bone loss (hypogonadism, malabsorption, hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism) 1, 3

Medication-Specific Considerations

Anticonvulsants

  • Anticonvulsants are associated with increased fracture risk and accelerated bone loss 1
  • Lower your treatment threshold in patients on chronic anticonvulsant therapy 1
  • Consider more frequent monitoring (every 1-2 years) 1

Other High-Risk Medications

  • Aromatase inhibitors, cancer chemotherapeutic drugs, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists all increase fracture risk 1
  • Anticoagulants are also implicated in increased fracture risk 1

Ethnic and Sex Considerations

Sex Differences

  • Men account for 24% of hip fractures and 21% of wrist fractures but only receive 10% of BMD tests—this represents significant underutilization 5
  • For men with osteoporosis, treatment with bisphosphonates reduces vertebral fracture risk 1
  • Men with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy require screening and 1-2 year follow-up intervals 1

Ethnicity

  • White persons are at higher risk than Black persons 1
  • FRAX has limitations regarding race-specific calculations, which may lead to differences in treatment recommendations 2
  • Use the reference data for the patient's ethnicity when available 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

DXA Limitations

  • DXA measures areal BMD (mass per unit area), not true volumetric density, which may underestimate bone density in short individuals or overestimate in tall individuals 1
  • BMD identifies less than half of people who will have an osteoporotic fracture—clinical risk factors are essential 1
  • Artifacts from degenerative changes, aortic calcification, or vertebral fractures can falsely elevate lumbar spine BMD 1

Interpretation Errors

  • Never rely on BMD alone—a patient with T-score -2.0 and prior fragility fracture has osteoporosis and requires treatment 3
  • Do not use T-scores in adults <50 years; this leads to overdiagnosis 1, 3
  • Do not ignore secondary causes: 44-90% of cases in premenopausal women and men <50 years have identifiable secondary causes 3

Follow-Up Testing Mistakes

  • Do not perform serial BMD testing more frequently than every 2-3 years in most patients 1
  • For low-risk individuals with normal baseline BMD (T-score ≥-1) and bone loss <1%/year, repeat testing is not necessary for at least 3 years 5
  • During the first 5 years of osteoporosis treatment, routine BMD monitoring is not recommended as changes in BMD explain only a small percentage of fracture risk reduction 1, 5

Site-Specific Measurement Priorities

Preferred Sites

  • Measure both lumbar spine (L1-L4) and hip (femoral neck and total hip) when feasible 1, 3
  • Use the lowest T-score from any site (lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip) for diagnosis 1
  • The posteroanterior lumbar spine is optimal for monitoring treatment response 4

Special Populations

  • In spinal cord injury patients, measure total hip, proximal tibia, and distal femur 1
  • Avoid lumbar spine measurements if significant degenerative changes are present 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

FRAX Calculator Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Osteoporosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Interpretation of bone densitometry studies.

Seminars in nuclear medicine, 1997

Research

Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Ontario health technology assessment series, 2006

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.