Can Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) be given to a patient with Aplastic Anemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 14, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ESA Use in Aplastic Anemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

ESAs may be offered to patients with lower-risk MDS (serum erythropoietin ≤500 IU/L) but should NOT be used in aplastic anemia except in rare circumstances where response has been documented. 1

Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Clear Indication

Patient Selection Criteria

ESAs are recommended as first-line therapy for symptomatic anemia in lower-risk MDS (IPSS low/intermediate-1 or IPSS-R very low/low/intermediate) when specific criteria are met 1, 2:

  • Serum erythropoietin level ≤500 IU/L (this is the most critical predictor—patients with levels >500 IU/L have very low response rates and should not receive ESAs) 1, 2
  • Transfusion requirement <2 units RBC per month (transfusion-dependent patients are less likely to respond) 2, 3
  • Hemoglobin <10 g/dL 1
  • Lower marrow blast percentage 2, 4

Expected Outcomes in MDS

  • Erythroid response rates of 40-60% in appropriately selected lower-risk MDS patients 1, 2, 5
  • Median duration of response: 20-24 months, with some patients responding for more than a decade 1, 6
  • Improved survival (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.44-0.83; P=0.002) compared to untreated controls, particularly in IPSS low-risk patients 2
  • No negative impact on AML progression—multiple studies confirm ESAs do not increase leukemic transformation risk 1, 6

Dosing Regimen for MDS

  • Initial dose: 40,000-60,000 units subcutaneously 1-3 times per week (or darbepoetin 150-300 mcg weekly) 2
  • Assess response at 6-8 weeks—if hemoglobin increase <1 g/dL, consider adding G-CSF or discontinuing 1, 2
  • Target hemoglobin ≤12 g/dL (never exceed 12 g/dL due to increased thromboembolism and mortality risk) 1, 2

Aplastic Anemia: Generally NOT Indicated

Critical Distinction

ESAs are NOT recommended for aplastic anemia in major clinical practice guidelines 1, 7. The ASCO/ASH 2019 guidelines explicitly state that ESAs should not be offered to most patients with nonchemotherapy-associated anemia, and aplastic anemia falls into this category 1.

Limited Evidence Base

The evidence for ESA use in aplastic anemia is extremely limited:

  • Only one older study (1993) showed any response in aplastic anemia, where 3 of 7 patients (43%) responded to high-dose rhEPO (12,000-24,000 units three times weekly), and these responders had relatively low baseline serum erythropoietin levels 8
  • No modern randomized controlled trials support ESA use in aplastic anemia 8
  • Aplastic anemia is listed as a "patient-related cause of anemia that must be identified and addressed before considering ESA use" in cancer-associated anemia guidelines 7

When ESAs Might Be Considered in Aplastic Anemia

If ESAs are attempted in aplastic anemia (off-label, not guideline-supported), the following conditions should be met:

  • Baseline serum erythropoietin level is relatively low (<500 IU/L, though no validated cutoff exists for aplastic anemia) 8
  • Patient has failed or is not a candidate for definitive therapies (immunosuppressive therapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation)
  • Close monitoring with serial serum erythropoietin measurements—a progressive decline in endogenous EPO during therapy may predict response, while persistently elevated or increasing levels suggest non-response 8
  • Trial period of 8-12 weeks maximum—discontinue if no response 8

Critical Pre-Treatment Requirements (Both Conditions)

Before initiating ESAs in either MDS or aplastic anemia, the following must be addressed 1, 2:

  • Rule out and correct iron deficiency (functional iron deficiency is a common cause of ESA failure) 1, 2
  • Exclude other reversible causes: blood loss, infection, B12/folate deficiency, hemolysis 1
  • Baseline cardiovascular risk assessment (ESAs increase thromboembolism risk by 67%) 9, 7

Safety Considerations

Thromboembolism Risk

ESAs increase thromboembolism risk by 67% compared to placebo 9, 7. This risk is particularly concerning in:

  • Patients with baseline cardiovascular disease 9
  • When hemoglobin exceeds 12 g/dL 1, 2
  • Patients receiving curative-intent chemotherapy (contraindicated) 1

Monitoring Requirements

  • Weekly CBC during initial treatment to assess response and prevent hemoglobin >12 g/dL 2
  • Reduce dose by 25-50% if hemoglobin rises >2 g/dL within 4 weeks 9
  • Withhold treatment if hemoglobin exceeds 13 g/dL until it falls below 12 g/dL, then restart at 25% lower dose 9

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not continue ESAs beyond 6-8 weeks in non-responders—this exposes patients to unnecessary thromboembolism risk without benefit 9, 2
  • Do not use ESAs when serum erythropoietin >500 IU/L in MDS—response rates are extremely low 1, 2
  • Do not target hemoglobin >12 g/dL—multiple studies demonstrate increased mortality and thromboembolism 1, 9, 2
  • Do not assume ESAs work in aplastic anemia—the evidence base is minimal and guidelines do not support this use 1, 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Erythropoietin Therapy in Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents and other growth factors in low-risk MDS.

Best practice & research. Clinical haematology, 2013

Guideline

Comparative Risk Assessment of Reblozyl and ESAs in Beta Thalassemia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

EPO Beta Dosing for Anemia in Lymphoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.