What is the role of pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab) in the treatment of stage III microsatellite instability-high (MSI-high) colon cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 14, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pembrolizumab in Stage III MSI-High Colon Cancer

Pembrolizumab is not currently established as standard treatment for stage III MSI-high colon cancer, but emerging evidence from neoadjuvant trials suggests it may offer organ-sparing potential in this population. The current evidence base and regulatory approvals focus on metastatic/unresectable disease, not stage III resectable disease.

Current Regulatory Status and Evidence Base

FDA-Approved Indications for MSI-H Colorectal Cancer

  • Pembrolizumab received FDA approval in 2017 for unresectable or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors that have progressed following prior treatment 1
  • The approval was based on 149 patients with MSI-H/dMMR cancers across five multicenter trials, achieving an ORR of 39.6% with durable responses lasting ≥6 months in 78% of responders 1
  • First-line pembrolizumab for metastatic MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer is strongly recommended based on the KEYNOTE-177 trial, which demonstrated superior PFS (16.5 vs 8.2 months; HR 0.60) and improved OS (77.5 vs 36.7 months; HR 0.73) compared to chemotherapy 1, 2, 3, 4

Stage III Disease: The Evidence Gap

There are no completed phase III trials specifically evaluating pembrolizumab in stage III MSI-high colon cancer. The guideline evidence focuses exclusively on metastatic or unresectable disease 1.

Emerging Neoadjuvant Data

KEYNOTE-164 Neoadjuvant Study

  • A phase II trial evaluated neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in localized MSI-H/dMMR tumors (including 27 colorectal cancer patients), demonstrating a 65% pathologic complete response rate among 17 patients who underwent surgery 5
  • The best overall response rate was 82% among 33 evaluable patients 5
  • Ten patients (29%) elected organ-sparing surveillance after 1 year of pembrolizumab without surgical resection, though this approach remains investigational 5
  • Six patients (17%) experienced progression events during follow-up, four requiring salvage surgery 5
  • No new safety signals were observed compared to metastatic disease trials 5

Key Caveats for Neoadjuvant Approach

  • This was a single-center, non-randomized phase II study without long-term follow-up data 5
  • The 17% progression rate highlights that not all MSI-H tumors respond to pembrolizumab, even in the localized setting 5
  • Patients who decline surgery after neoadjuvant pembrolizumab are accepting an unproven strategy with potential for disease progression 5

Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm for Stage III MSI-H Colon Cancer

Standard of Care Approach

  1. Stage III MSI-high colon cancer should be treated with surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX or CAPOX) as per standard guidelines - this remains the evidence-based standard despite the lack of specific guideline citations for this population

  2. MSI-H status does NOT currently change the standard surgical approach for stage III disease - the neoadjuvant data is too preliminary 5

Investigational Considerations

If considering neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in stage III MSI-H colon cancer:

  • This should only be done in the context of a clinical trial or with extensive informed consent about the investigational nature 5
  • Patients must understand the 17% risk of progression and potential need for salvage surgery 5
  • Close radiographic and clinical monitoring is essential (the median time to response is approximately 3 months) 2
  • Initial progression may occur in up to 29% of MSI-H colorectal cancer patients before response (pseudoprogression), requiring careful assessment 2

When Pembrolizumab IS Appropriate

If stage III disease progresses to metastatic disease or becomes unresectable:

  • Pembrolizumab becomes first-line standard of care for MSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer 1, 2, 3
  • Pembrolizumab monotherapy 200 mg IV every 3 weeks is preferred over chemotherapy 1, 2
  • Expected PFS is 16.5 months with significantly fewer grade 3-5 adverse events (22% vs 66% with chemotherapy) 1, 3, 4

Safety Profile

  • Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occur in only 22% of patients receiving pembrolizumab, compared to 66-67% with chemotherapy 1, 3, 4
  • Common adverse events include diarrhea, fatigue, pruritus, nausea, rash, arthralgia, and hypothyroidism 6
  • Immune-mediated toxicities affecting skin, liver, kidneys, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and endocrine systems require monitoring 7
  • Pneumonitis occurs in approximately 3-7% of patients and represents one of the most serious complications 7

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume MSI-H status alone justifies deviation from standard surgical management in stage III disease - the neoadjuvant data is phase II only 5
  • Do not use pembrolizumab in MSI-H stage III colon cancer outside of clinical trials without extensive discussion of the investigational nature and risks 5
  • Do not confuse the strong evidence for pembrolizumab in metastatic MSI-H disease with evidence for stage III disease - these are distinct clinical scenarios 1, 3, 5
  • Testing for MSI/MMR status should be performed to guide future treatment decisions if disease progresses 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Pembrolizumab Treatment Protocol in Cancer Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Localized Microsatellite Instability High/Deficient Mismatch Repair Solid Tumors.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023

Guideline

Treatment of Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) Colorectal Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What are the checkpoint inhibitors for rectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)?
What is the optimal duration of pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab) therapy for a patient with metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal adenocarcinoma who has achieved a sustained complete response?
What is the role of Dostarlimab (antibody) in treating colorectal cancer, particularly in patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors?
What is the role of Microsatellite Instability (MSI) testing in determining suitability for immunotherapy, specifically with pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab)?
What are the pathophysiological mechanisms by which cancer causes lymphopenia in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of cancer, particularly those with hematologic malignancies such as leukemia or lymphoma?
What is the most effective beta blocker (beta-adrenergic blocking agent) for a patient with hypertension (high blood pressure) and no significant comorbidities (co-existing medical conditions)?
What causes a low White Blood Cell (WBC) count, also known as leukopenia?
What is the recommended treatment plan for a patient with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)?
What is the management approach for a patient presenting with a scrotal abscess, considering potential underlying conditions such as diabetes?
What is difficult weaning in a critically ill patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who has been on mechanical ventilation for an extended period?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.