Endovascular Treatment for Thoracic Aneurysm
For patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysms ≥55 mm and suitable anatomy, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the recommended treatment over open surgical repair. 1
Treatment Thresholds and Indications
Descending Thoracic Aorta (DTA) Aneurysms
- Elective repair is indicated when diameter reaches ≥55 mm in patients without heritable thoracic aortic disease 1
- For patients with high-risk features (rapid growth, saccular morphology, symptomatic), consider intervention at diameters <55 mm 1
- TEVAR is recommended as first-line treatment over open repair when anatomy is suitable (Class I recommendation, Level B evidence) 1, 2
Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms (TAAA)
- Elective repair is recommended when diameter reaches ≥60 mm 1
- Consider repair at ≥55 mm if high-risk features present or patient is very low risk under care of experienced multidisciplinary team 1
- Endovascular repair using fenestrated and/or branched endografts should be considered in experienced centers when anatomy is suitable (Class IIa recommendation) 1, 3
Aortic Arch Aneurysms
- Open surgical replacement remains the gold standard for low-to-intermediate risk patients with isolated arch aneurysms ≥55 mm 4
- For high-risk surgical candidates, hybrid arch repair combining supra-aortic debranching with TEVAR may be considered as an alternative 4, 5
- Symptomatic patients require immediate surgical evaluation regardless of size 4
Key Advantages of TEVAR Over Open Repair
The endovascular approach provides substantial benefits that drive the strong recommendation for its use:
- Lower perioperative mortality and morbidity compared to open repair 6, 2
- Avoids thoracotomy incision, aortic cross-clamping, and need for extracorporeal circulation 1, 6
- Reduced blood loss and shorter hospital length of stay 6, 2
- Particularly valuable for patients with significant comorbidities (cardiac, pulmonary, renal dysfunction, advanced age) who are poor candidates for open surgery 1
Critical Technical Requirements for TEVAR
Pre-procedural Planning
- Fine-cut (≤0.25 mm) CTA of entire aorta, iliac and femoral arteries is required for case planning 2
- CTA of head and neck needed to determine vertebral artery anatomy 2
- Routine use of three-dimensional centerline reconstruction software is essential for accurate planning and execution 2
Anatomic Prerequisites
- Adequate proximal and distal landing zones (typically ≥2 cm of healthy aorta) 7
- Sufficient distal vascular access size for device delivery 7
- Limited tortuosity of abdominal and thoracic aorta 7
Left Subclavian Artery (LSA) Management
- When TEVAR requires planned LSA coverage, revascularization of the LSA before TEVAR is mandatory to reduce risk of spinal cord ischemia and stroke (Class I recommendation) 1
Important Limitations and Complications
Device-Related Complications
TEVAR has a complication rate as high as 38%, higher than abdominal EVAR 6:
- Endoleaks (most common) requiring re-intervention 6
- Endograft migration or collapse 6
- Kinking/stenosis of endograft components 6
- Secondary re-interventions required in approximately 24% of cases 6
Serious Systemic Complications
- Spinal cord ischemia (approximately 5% incidence, similar to open repair) 1
- Cerebrovascular events and stroke 7, 6
- End-organ ischemia 6
- Paraplegia, renal failure 8
Long-term Considerations
- TEVAR is palliative rather than curative, and risk of aneurysmal rupture still exists 8
- Long-term durability data is limited, and material fatigue remains a concern 7
- The early mortality benefit of TEVAR over open repair decreases after 1 year 1
Critical Contraindications
TEVAR is contraindicated for elective intervention in patients with genetically mediated aortic disorders including:
These patients have fragile tissue with high TEVAR failure rates and should undergo open repair if they are young, healthy, with suitable anatomy and prolonged life expectancy 1, 4
Mandatory Surveillance Protocol
Post-TEVAR Imaging Schedule
- Imaging at 1 month post-operatively using contrast-enhanced CT to assess intervention success 1, 2
- Repeat imaging at 12 months, then yearly for life 1, 2
- More frequent imaging if endoleak or abnormality detected at 1 month 2
- CT remains the gold standard for surveillance 6
Endoleak Management
- Type I endoleaks require immediate re-intervention to achieve seal (Class I recommendation) 1
- Type III endoleaks require re-intervention, principally by endovascular means (Class I recommendation) 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not delay referral to specialized high-volume aortic centers once intervention thresholds are met, as outcomes are significantly improved at experienced centers 4
- Do not underestimate access vessel requirements; large-bore sheaths for fenestrated grafts may require surgical conduit in patients with peripheral arterial disease 3
- Recognize that arch aneurysms rarely occur in isolation and require comprehensive aortic imaging 4
- Maintain continuous blood pressure management post-procedure to prevent hypotension (compromises spinal cord perfusion) or hypertension (increases endoleak risk) 3