Diagnostic Confirmation of Calciphylaxis
Calciphylaxis diagnosis is primarily clinical, based on characteristic painful skin lesions in the appropriate clinical context, with C-reactive protein being the most helpful laboratory test; skin biopsy is NOT recommended due to poor sensitivity (20-80%) and risk of worsening tissue injury. 1
Clinical Diagnosis
The diagnosis of calciphylaxis should be suspected when patients with end-stage renal disease present with:
- Painful, violaceous, mottled skin lesions progressing to necrotic ulcers, typically on the extremities or trunk 2, 3, 4
- Subcutaneous nodules or indurated plaques that are exquisitely painful, often described as out of proportion to physical findings 1, 5
- Palpable or visible subcutaneous calcifications on physical examination 3, 4
The pain is a critical diagnostic feature—calciphylaxis lesions are characteristically extremely painful and require aggressive pain management. 1
Laboratory Testing
Most Helpful Test
- C-reactive protein (CRP) is the single most helpful laboratory test, as inflammation is strongly associated with calciphylaxis risk 1
Standard Metabolic Panel
- Serum calcium, phosphorus, and intact PTH should be measured, though normal levels do NOT exclude calciphylaxis 1
- Calcium-phosphate product calculation (Ca × P) is important; values >70 mg²/dL² increase risk, though calciphylaxis can occur with normal mineral levels 6, 3
- Alkaline phosphatase may be elevated, reflecting bone turnover in secondary hyperparathyroidism 7
Critical Pitfall
Do not rely on calcium and phosphorus levels to rule out calciphylaxis—patients can develop this condition even with normal mineral levels, as the pathophysiology involves local vascular factors beyond systemic mineral derangements. 1
Imaging Studies
- Plain radiographs of affected areas may reveal vascular calcification or soft-tissue calcium deposits, providing supportive evidence 3, 8
- No specific imaging is required for diagnosis, but radiographic evidence of medial vascular calcification supports the clinical diagnosis 4
Skin Biopsy: NOT Recommended
Skin biopsy should be avoided for the following reasons:
- Variable sensitivity of only 20-80%, meaning negative biopsy does not exclude diagnosis 1
- Risk of traumatizing vulnerable tissue, potentially worsening necrosis and creating non-healing wounds 1
- No validated histologic diagnostic criteria exist 1
- Clinical diagnosis is sufficient when characteristic lesions are present in the appropriate context 1
If biopsy is performed despite these concerns, findings include calcium deposits in the vascular intima and media of small to medium dermal vessels. 8
Risk Factor Assessment
Document the presence of key risk factors:
- Vitamin K antagonist use (warfarin), which increases risk 11-fold 1, 5
- End-stage renal disease on dialysis (most common setting) 2, 3, 4
- Secondary hyperparathyroidism with elevated PTH, though calciphylaxis can occur with normal or even low PTH (adynamic bone disease) 1, 3
- Recent initiation of warfarin (often within months of symptom onset) 5
- Chronic calcitriol use, particularly in hypoparathyroid patients 5
Diagnostic Algorithm
- Recognize characteristic painful skin lesions (violaceous, mottled, progressing to necrosis) in a patient with renal disease 3, 4
- Measure CRP as the most helpful confirmatory laboratory test 1
- Check calcium, phosphorus, PTH, and alkaline phosphatase to guide treatment, not to confirm diagnosis 1, 7
- Obtain plain radiographs of affected areas to look for vascular or soft-tissue calcification 3, 8
- AVOID skin biopsy unless diagnosis is genuinely uncertain and would change management 1
- Immediately discontinue warfarin if present 1
- Initiate treatment without delay, as prognosis is dismal with 2-year mortality of 50-80% from sepsis 8
Treatment Priorities After Diagnosis
Once calciphylaxis is diagnosed:
- Sodium thiosulfate 12.5-25g per dialysis session, 2-3 times weekly for 3-6 months as first-line therapy 1
- Discontinue all vitamin K antagonists immediately and consider reduced-dose apixaban if anticoagulation is essential 1
- Aggressive pain control is mandatory given the extreme pain associated with these lesions 1
- Parathyroidectomy for PTH >500 pg/mL in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism 1, 2, 3, 4
- Optimize mineral metabolism: reduce calcium-containing phosphate binders, lower dialysate calcium to 1.5-2.0 mEq/L, and minimize vitamin D dosing 1
The prognosis remains poor even with aggressive treatment, emphasizing the critical importance of early recognition based on clinical features rather than waiting for biopsy confirmation. 4, 8