How to document a discussion about immunizations in a SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) note for a 4-month-old patient whose parents have opted to reconsider vaccinations during a well-child visit?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 14, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Documentation of Immunization Discussion in SOAP Note

Document the vaccine discussion thoroughly in the Assessment and Plan sections, clearly stating that you discussed vaccine benefits and disease risks, addressed parental concerns, provided educational materials, and scheduled follow-up at the 4-month visit to revisit the decision—this protects you legally and maintains the therapeutic relationship. 1

Subjective Section

  • Document parental concerns verbatim or paraphrased: Record the specific reasons parents gave for wanting to reconsider (e.g., "Parents express concerns about vaccine safety and side effects" or "Parents want more time to research vaccines"). 2, 1

  • Note the parent's position on the vaccine hesitancy spectrum: Identify whether they are misinformed, vaccine-hesitant, or cautious acceptors, as this guides your communication strategy and documents your assessment of their decision-making process. 2, 1

Objective Section

  • Record what educational materials were provided: Document specific handouts, VIS (Vaccine Information Statements), or resources given to parents. 2

  • Note time spent in discussion: Given that 53% of physicians spend 10-19 minutes with vaccine-hesitant parents, documenting the time invested demonstrates appropriate counseling effort. 2

Assessment Section

This is where your clinical reasoning should be most explicit:

  • State your medical recommendation clearly: Write "Vaccines are medically indicated and recommended per CDC/AAP schedule. Discussed that vaccines are safe and effective, and serious disease can occur without immunization." 2

  • Document specific topics discussed: Include that you explained vaccine safety testing, disease prevention benefits (e.g., "Discussed how DTaP prevents pertussis, which can be fatal in infants"), and risks of remaining unvaccinated. 2

  • Address specific parental concerns raised: If parents mentioned "too many vaccines," document that you explained the immune system can handle the antigens and that today's vaccines contain fewer antigens than historical vaccines. 2

  • Note your communication approach: Document that you used a "guiding style" by listening to concerns, providing balanced information, and determining readiness to change rather than being confrontational. 2, 1

Plan Section

This section is critical for liability protection and continuity of care:

  • Document informed refusal: Write "Parents decline vaccines at this visit after discussion of risks and benefits. Parents understand the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases and potential consequences of delayed vaccination." 2, 1

  • Schedule specific follow-up: State "Plan to revisit immunization discussion at 4-month well-child visit" with a specific date if possible. 2, 1

  • Provide resources for interval review: Document that you gave parents specific, reliable resources to review (e.g., CDC website, AAP materials) before the next visit. 2, 1

  • Maintain the therapeutic relationship: Note "Will continue to provide comprehensive care and ongoing vaccine education. Family remains in practice." The AAP recommends against dismissing vaccine-hesitant families, as maintaining the relationship increases the likelihood of eventual vaccination. 2, 1

  • Consider a refusal form: While not always necessary for deferral (versus outright refusal), document whether you offered or completed a vaccine refusal form. 2

Critical Documentation Elements

These protect you legally and clinically:

  • Be specific about what was discussed: Vague statements like "discussed vaccines" are insufficient. Document that you explained specific diseases prevented, vaccine safety data, and risks of non-vaccination. 2

  • Avoid judgmental language: Use neutral, factual language rather than terms that suggest parental negligence, as this maintains trust and increases the likelihood parents will return. 2, 1

  • Document persistence: Note that you made a strong recommendation for vaccination, as 30-47% of initially refusing parents eventually accept when providers persist with recommendations. 1

  • Record your assessment of understanding: Write "Parents verbalize understanding of risks and benefits discussed" to document informed decision-making. 1

Example Documentation Template

Assessment: "Immunizations due per CDC/AAP schedule (list specific vaccines). Discussed vaccine safety, efficacy, and importance of timely vaccination. Explained risks of vaccine-preventable diseases including [specific diseases]. Addressed parental concerns regarding [specific concerns]. Provided balanced information using guiding communication style. Parents verbalize understanding but wish to reconsider."

Plan: "Parents decline vaccines today after informed discussion. Provided VIS sheets and CDC educational materials for review. Strongly recommend vaccination per standard schedule. Will revisit at 4-month well-child visit on [date]. Therapeutic relationship maintained. Will continue comprehensive care and vaccine education."

References

Guideline

Approach to Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.