What is the likelihood of spontaneous passage of a right renal stone in the lower pole in an adult with no significant medical history?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 14, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Likelihood of Spontaneous Passage for Lower Pole Renal Stones

Lower pole renal stones have a very low likelihood of spontaneous passage, with rates of only 2.9% to 7% compared to 14.5% for upper pole/mid renal stones, making them the least likely renal stone location to pass without intervention. 1, 2

Stone Passage Rates by Location

Lower pole stones are significantly disadvantaged by gravity-dependent drainage issues and unfavorable collecting system anatomy:

  • Lower pole stones pass spontaneously in only 2.9-7% of cases during multi-year follow-up periods 1, 3
  • Upper pole and mid-renal stones pass in 14.5% of cases, making them 5 times more likely to pass than lower pole stones 1
  • Lower pole location is an independent predictor of failure to pass spontaneously (p = 0.016) 1

Why Lower Pole Stones Don't Pass

The anatomical factors that trap lower pole stones include:

  • Narrow infundibulum and acute infundibulopelvic angles create mechanical barriers to stone fragment migration 4, 5
  • Gravity works against stone passage from the lower pole, unlike upper or mid-renal locations where gravity assists drainage 4
  • Patients with lower pole stones have significantly smaller infundibulum-pelvic angles (96.6° vs 112.5° in normal kidneys, p<0.001) and longer infundibular length (27.5mm vs 22.5mm, p<0.001) 5

Clinical Implications for Management

Given the extremely low spontaneous passage rates:

  • Active surveillance is reasonable for asymptomatic lower pole stones, as only 24.3% become symptomatic over 3+ years of follow-up 1
  • Lower pole stones are less likely to cause symptoms compared to upper/mid renal stones (24.3% vs 40.6%, p = 0.047) 1
  • When intervention is needed, ureteroscopy or shock wave lithotripsy should be offered for stones ≤10mm, though SWL has reduced efficacy for lower pole locations 6, 4
  • For lower pole stones 10-20mm, ureteroscopy (81% success) or PCNL (87% success) are preferred over SWL (58% success) 6, 4

Stone-Related Events During Observation

If choosing conservative management, patients should understand:

  • 45% of asymptomatic renal stones will have a stone-related event requiring intervention or causing symptoms over 41 months 2
  • Lower pole stones are significantly less likely to cause events than interpolar or multiple-location stones (OR: 2.05 and 2.29 respectively) 2
  • Risk of silent obstruction is approximately 2-3%, necessitating regular imaging surveillance every 6 months 1

Key Predictors of Passage (When It Occurs)

For the rare lower pole stones that do pass:

  • Stone size <5mm increases likelihood of any spontaneous passage 6, 3
  • Younger age and male gender are associated with higher passage rates 3
  • Single stone location (vs multiple stones) improves passage probability 2, 7

References

Guideline

Treatment of Lower Pole Kidney Stone Causing Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Anatomy of the collecting system of lower pole of the kidney in patients with a single renal stone: a comparative study with individuals with normal kidneys.

Saudi journal of kidney diseases and transplantation : an official publication of the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Saudi Arabia, 2010

Guideline

Nonobstructing Kidney Stone Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.