What is the significance of SAAG (Serum-Ascites Albumin Gradient) values in patients presenting with ascites?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 15, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

SAAG Values: Clinical Significance in Ascites Evaluation

Primary Diagnostic Function

The SAAG (Serum-Ascites Albumin Gradient) is calculated by subtracting ascitic fluid albumin from serum albumin measured on the same day, and serves as the single most accurate test to distinguish portal hypertension-related ascites (SAAG ≥1.1 g/dL) from non-portal hypertension causes (SAAG <1.1 g/dL) with approximately 97% accuracy. 1, 2, 3

Calculation Method

  • Measure serum albumin and ascitic fluid albumin on the same day 1, 3
  • Subtract the ascitic fluid albumin value from the serum albumin value 1, 3
  • The resulting number is the SAAG 3

Interpretation of SAAG Values

High SAAG (≥1.1 g/dL): Portal Hypertension Present

A SAAG ≥1.1 g/dL indicates portal hypertension with 97% accuracy and predicts response to sodium restriction and diuretics. 1, 2, 3

Common causes include:

  • Liver cirrhosis 1, 2
  • Cardiac ascites 1, 2
  • Hepatic vein thrombosis (Budd-Chiari syndrome) 1, 2, 3
  • Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (veno-occlusive disease) 1, 2, 3

Low SAAG (<1.1 g/dL): Non-Portal Hypertension Causes

A SAAG <1.1 g/dL indicates non-portal hypertension etiology and predicts that patients will NOT respond to sodium restriction and diuretics (except nephrotic syndrome). 2, 3, 4

Common causes include:

  • Peritoneal carcinomatosis 2, 4
  • Tuberculous peritonitis 1, 2, 4
  • Nephrotic syndrome 2, 3, 4
  • Pancreatic ascites 2

Refining the Diagnosis: Adding Ascitic Fluid Protein

When SAAG is ≥1.1 g/dL, measure ascitic fluid total protein to distinguish cardiac from cirrhotic ascites: 2, 3

  • High SAAG (≥1.1 g/dL) + High protein (>2.5 g/dL) = Cardiac ascites 2, 3
  • High SAAG (≥1.1 g/dL) + Low protein (<2.5 g/dL) = Cirrhotic ascites 2, 3

When SAAG is <1.1 g/dL with high protein (>2.5 g/dL), suspect peritoneal tuberculosis or peritoneal carcinomatosis and proceed immediately to cytology, mycobacterial cultures, and consider laparoscopy with biopsy. 4

Direct Treatment Implications

For High SAAG Ascites (≥1.1 g/dL):

  • Initiate dietary sodium restriction to 2000 mg/day (88 mmol/day) 2
  • Start oral diuretics: spironolactone 100 mg daily plus furosemide 40 mg daily 2
  • Treat underlying liver disease (e.g., alcohol cessation for alcoholic cirrhosis) 2, 3
  • Consider large-volume paracentesis for tense ascites with albumin replacement at 8g per liter removed 2

For Low SAAG Ascites (<1.1 g/dL):

  • Do NOT use sodium restriction and diuretics as primary therapy (exception: nephrotic syndrome may respond) 3, 4
  • Direct treatment toward the underlying disorder 3, 4
  • Order additional testing based on clinical suspicion: cytology for malignancy, mycobacterial cultures for tuberculosis 1, 4

Critical Pitfalls and Caveats

Mixed Ascites

Approximately 5% of patients have two or more causes of ascites simultaneously. 2, 3, 4 When portal hypertension coexists with a second cause (e.g., cirrhosis plus peritoneal carcinomatosis), the SAAG remains ≥1.1 g/dL because portal hypertension dominates the gradient. 2, 3, 4

Low SAAG in Known Cirrhosis

In patients with established cirrhosis who develop low SAAG ascites, only 38% have an identifiable non-portal hypertension cause. 5 The most common identifiable causes are spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (38%), peritoneal carcinomatosis (28%), and nephrotic syndrome (17%). 5 Importantly, 73% of cirrhotic patients with low SAAG who undergo repeat paracentesis convert to high SAAG, suggesting measurement error or transient conditions. 5 Therefore, repeat paracentesis is recommended in cirrhotic patients with unexpectedly low SAAG. 5

Infection Risk Assessment

**Ascitic fluid total protein <1.5 g/dL is a major risk factor for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and may warrant prophylactic antibiotics in cirrhotic patients.** 4 Always measure ascitic fluid neutrophil count; >250 cells/μL indicates spontaneous bacterial peritonitis requiring immediate antibiotics. 4

Diagnostic Testing to Avoid

Never order serum CA-125 in patients with ascites—it is nonspecifically elevated by mesothelial cell pressure from any cause of ascites and leads to unnecessary gynecologic referrals and potentially harmful surgeries. 4

Prognostic Significance

Development of ascites in cirrhotic patients indicates poor prognosis with approximately 20% mortality in the first year, warranting liver transplantation evaluation. 2, 4

Initial Workup Algorithm

For all new-onset ascites, obtain: 2, 3, 4

  1. Ascitic fluid cell count with differential
  2. Ascitic fluid albumin (with simultaneous serum albumin for SAAG calculation)
  3. Ascitic fluid total protein
  4. If infection suspected: culture fluid at bedside in blood culture bottles before antibiotics 2, 3, 4
  5. Additional tests based on clinical suspicion: cytology, amylase, mycobacterial studies 1, 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

SAAG Score: Diagnostic Significance and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Utility of Serum-Ascites Albumin Gradient

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Low SAAG Ascites

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.