Can other antigens, such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus, or coronavirus, cause a false-positive result in a rapid influenza (flu) test in a patient presenting with influenza-like symptoms?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 15, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Can Other Antigens Cause False-Positive Rapid Influenza Tests?

No, other respiratory viral antigens such as RSV, adenovirus, or coronavirus do not typically cause false-positive results on rapid influenza tests—these tests have high specificity (>90-95%) for influenza antigens. 1, 2, 3

Understanding Rapid Influenza Test Specificity

The primary limitation of rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) is their low sensitivity (10-70%), not their specificity. 1, 2, 3 This means:

  • False-negative results are common (missing true influenza infections) 1
  • False-positive results are rare when tests are functioning properly 1, 3
  • Specificity consistently exceeds 90-95% across different RIDT platforms 1, 2, 3

What Actually Causes False-Positive Rapid Influenza Tests

While cross-reactivity with other respiratory viruses is not a significant concern, false-positive results can occur due to:

Test-Related Issues

  • Test kit malfunction or manufacturing defects, which should be suspected when results don't match clinical presentation 4
  • Improper test performance or interpretation by the operator 1
  • Low community influenza prevalence, which dramatically reduces positive predictive value even with high specificity 1, 3

Specimen Contamination

  • Influenza vaccine contamination at the collection site—vaccine RNA can be detected for at least 66 days after administration and can contaminate specimens collected in the same location where vaccines are given 5
  • Laboratory cross-contamination between specimens, though this is less common with point-of-care rapid tests 5

Post-Vaccination Detection

  • Recent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) can cause positive tests up to 7 days after administration, representing vaccine virus detection rather than true infection 1

Clinical Approach When Results Don't Match Clinical Picture

When a positive rapid test doesn't fit the clinical scenario:

  • Check if the patient received influenza vaccine recently (within 7 days for LAIV, or if specimen was collected at a vaccination site) 1, 5
  • Assess local influenza activity—during low prevalence periods, positive predictive value drops substantially 1, 3
  • Consider confirmatory RT-PCR testing, which has 86-100% sensitivity and high specificity 2, 6, 3
  • Trust the PCR result over the rapid test if discordant 3

Important Caveats

The differential diagnosis should still include other respiratory pathogens that can present identically to influenza, including RSV, parainfluenza viruses, adenovirus, human metapneumovirus, coronaviruses, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. 1, 6 However, these pathogens cause false-negative rapid influenza tests (by causing influenza-like illness without influenza), not false-positive results. 7

During influenza season with high community activity, positive rapid tests are generally reliable and should guide treatment decisions. 1 The concern about false-positives primarily applies to periods of low influenza circulation. 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Influenza Testing and Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Discrepancy Between Positive Rapid Flu Test and Negative PCR

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

[A case of acute pneumonia with prolonged false-positive results using an influenza test kit].

Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi. Japanese journal of geriatrics, 2020

Guideline

Influenza Diagnosis and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

How do you explain a patient with positive influenza A (flu A) and influenza B (flu B) rapid tests 4 days apart, but a negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test?
Can influenza (flu) cause a false positive Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) test result?
Could the pertussis (whooping cough) and influenza (flu) vaccination 48 hours ago cause these abnormal blood test results, including elevated C-reactive protein and impaired renal function?
How do you diagnose a viral infection?
What conditions can cause false viral positivities?
What is the recommended treatment regimen for a low-risk patient with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)?
What causes a discrepancy between a positive in-office rapid flu test for both Influenza A (Flu A) and Influenza B (Flu B) and a negative Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test in a patient?
Can S2 splitting be heard in all auscultation areas in a 20-year-old male patient with an atrial septal defect (ASD) and a recent history of upper respiratory infection?
What approach to pediatric psychotherapy is recommended in a predominantly Catholic, third-world setting with limited access to healthcare services?
What is the importance of including a main or primary diagnosis and secondary diagnoses in a comprehensive diagnosis for patients with complex medical conditions, such as an elderly patient with a history of hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, and heart disease?
What is the management approach for patients with Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) 3 and 4 thyroid nodules less than 0.5cm?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.