What type of splint is recommended for a pediatric patient with a torus fracture of the distal radius?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 15, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pediatric Torus Fracture of the Distal Radius: Splint Recommendation

A removable splint is the recommended treatment for pediatric torus (buckle) fractures of the distal radius, worn for 3 weeks without the need for routine follow-up or repeat radiographs. 1, 2

Treatment Algorithm

Initial Management

  • Apply a removable splint in the emergency department and discharge the patient immediately 1, 2
  • The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) specifically recommends removable splints as appropriate for minimally displaced distal radius fractures 1
  • Duration of immobilization should be 3 weeks 1, 2

Active Motion Protocol

  • Instruct patients to perform active finger motion exercises immediately following diagnosis 1
  • Finger motion does not adversely affect adequately stabilized distal radius fractures and is critical to prevent stiffness, which is one of the most functionally disabling complications 3, 1
  • Early wrist motion is not routinely necessary following stable fracture fixation 3, 1

Follow-Up Requirements

  • No routine clinical or radiological follow-up is necessary when adequate information is provided at diagnosis 2
  • If follow-up is performed, radiographic evaluation at approximately 3 weeks and at immobilization removal can confirm adequate healing 1

Evidence Supporting Removable Splints

The highest quality recent evidence strongly supports this approach:

  • A 2022 randomized controlled equivalence trial (FORCE trial) involving 965 children demonstrated that pain was equivalent at 3 days between bandage and rigid immobilization groups (adjusted difference -0.10,95% CI -0.37 to 0.17) 4
  • There were no differences in functional recovery, quality of life, or school absence at any point during 6-week follow-up 4, 5
  • Complication rates were extremely low and equivalent: 1.0% in the bandage group versus 0.6% in the rigid immobilization group 5
  • All fractures healed without significant change in alignment regardless of immobilization method 6

Clinical and Economic Benefits

  • Removable splints significantly reduce treatment costs and have high probability of cost-effectiveness 5
  • Children with removable splints demonstrate improved physical functioning, can shower and bathe more easily, and report lower pain scores 6
  • The cast group had more unscheduled ED visits due to cast-related problems (discomfort, getting wet) 6
  • This approach represents both an economical and resource saving for patients, parents, and the health service 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not routinely order follow-up radiographs - they are unnecessary when adequate information is provided at diagnosis 2
  • Do not use rigid casting - evidence shows no benefit over removable splints for torus fractures 4, 5, 6
  • Monitor for skin irritation or muscle atrophy, which occur in approximately 14.7% of immobilization cases 1
  • Consider rigid immobilization only for very young children or those with special needs who may easily remove the device 6

When Alternative Treatment Is Needed

If radiographs show any of the following, surgical management may be indicated instead of conservative splinting 1:

  • Significant displacement >3mm
  • Dorsal tilt >10°
  • Intra-articular involvement

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.