Is Lab GFR Calculation Based on BUN/Cr Reliable?
No, GFR calculation should not be based on BUN/Cr ratio alone—instead, use creatinine-based estimating equations (eGFRcr) like MDRD or CKD-EPI for initial assessment, recognizing these have important limitations, and add cystatin C measurement (eGFRcr-cys) when accuracy is critical or confounding factors exist. 1, 2
The Fundamental Problem with Serum Creatinine Alone
Clinicians should never use serum creatinine concentration as the sole means to assess kidney function. 1 The evidence is clear on why:
- Serum creatinine is affected by multiple non-GFR factors including creatinine secretion, generation, and extrarenal excretion, making it an unreliable standalone marker. 1
- GFR must decline to approximately half the normal level before serum creatinine rises above the upper limit of normal. 1
- Up to 25% of people (particularly thin, elderly women) have significantly reduced eGFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m²) despite serum creatinine values within the reference interval. 3
- In cancer patients, approximately 60% had abnormal renal function by eGFR but only 5% by serum creatinine alone. 2
The BUN/Cr ratio is not a validated method for GFR estimation and does not appear in any major kidney disease guidelines. 1
The Recommended Approach: Creatinine-Based Estimating Equations
Use prediction equations that incorporate serum creatinine along with age, sex, race, and sometimes body size as the initial assessment. 1
The validated equations include:
- MDRD equation: More accurate for GFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m² and does not require height or weight. 1
- Cockcroft-Gault equation: Widely used but less accurate than MDRD, particularly in elderly patients where it consistently underestimates GFR. 1, 2
- 2021 CKD-EPI equation: The most recent race-free equation that provides reasonable initial assessment in most adults. 2
Clinical laboratories should automatically report eGFR alongside serum creatinine measurements. 1
Critical Limitations: When eGFRcr Is Unreliable
eGFRcr is fundamentally "not sufficiently accurate and precise" compared to measured GFR. 1, 2 Specific situations where eGFRcr fails:
Extremes of Muscle Mass
- Very low muscle mass (elderly, malnourished, muscle wasting diseases) causes overestimation of GFR. 1, 2
- Very high muscle mass (bodybuilders, athletes) causes underestimation of GFR. 2
- Paraplegia or quadriplegia significantly alters creatinine generation. 1
Dietary Factors
- Vegetarian diets reduce creatinine generation. 1
- High-protein diets and creatine supplements increase creatinine independent of kidney function. 2
- Low-protein and ketogenic diets alter non-GFR determinants of creatinine. 2
Chronic Illness States
- Advanced cirrhosis with high cell turnover compromises accuracy. 2
- Cancer with high catabolism/inflammation renders eGFRcr unreliable. 2
- Heart failure, severe malnutrition, and catabolic consuming diseases all affect creatinine generation. 2
Body Composition Extremes
- Obesity class III (BMI >40 kg/m²) significantly reduces eGFRcr accuracy. 2
- Extremes of body size in either direction compromise reliability. 1
Medication Effects
- Trimethoprim, cimetidine, and other drugs that decrease tubular secretion alter creatinine without changing GFR. 2
- Anabolic steroids and hormone treatments affect creatinine generation. 2
When and How to Use Better Methods
Add Cystatin C for Improved Accuracy
Measure cystatin C and calculate eGFRcr-cys when eGFRcr is expected to be inaccurate and GFR affects clinical decision-making. 1, 2 This is a Grade 1C recommendation from KDIGO 2024. 1
Cystatin C advantages:
- Less influenced by muscle mass, diet, age, sex, and race compared to creatinine. 2
- Produced by all nucleated cells, providing more consistent generation. 2
- The combined creatinine-cystatin C equation (eGFRcr-cys) demonstrates superior accuracy. 1, 2
Important caveats: High catabolic states and exogenous steroid use can affect cystatin C accuracy. 2
Measure GFR Directly When Precision Is Critical
Use measured GFR with exogenous filtration markers (iothalamate, iohexol, inulin) when treatment decisions critically depend on precise GFR. 1, 2, 4
Specific indications for measured GFR:
- Kidney-cleared chemotherapy dosing. 2
- Rapidly changing kidney function. 1
- Calculation of doses for potentially toxic drugs excreted by kidneys. 1
- Clinical trials requiring precise GFR. 2
If measured GFR is unavailable and eGFRcr-cys is thought inaccurate, consider timed urine collections for measured creatinine clearance. 1, 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never assume "normal" creatinine means normal kidney function, especially in elderly patients with low body weight where significant renal impairment can exist despite near-normal creatinine. 5
- Do not ignore clinical context suggesting altered creatinine generation—extremes of muscle mass, dietary intake, or catabolic states require alternative assessment. 2
- Ensure laboratory standardization: Creatinine assay methods significantly affect accuracy, with Jaffe method overestimating by 5-15% compared to enzymatic methods. 2 Laboratories must calibrate to international reference standards. 1
- Recognize equation-specific limitations: Both Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD formulas failed to reach K/DOQI accuracy standards in validation studies, with 29-32% of subjects misclassified. 2
- For medication dosing, use Cockcroft-Gault formula as most drug dosing guidelines were established using this equation, despite its limitations. 5
Practical Algorithm
- Initial assessment: Use eGFRcr from automated laboratory reporting with MDRD or CKD-EPI equation. 1
- Assess for confounders: Review muscle mass, diet, medications, chronic illness, and body composition. 2
- If confounders present or critical decision: Measure cystatin C and calculate eGFRcr-cys. 1, 2
- If eGFRcr-cys still unreliable or precision critical: Obtain measured GFR with exogenous markers. 1, 2
- If measured GFR unavailable: Consider 24-hour urine creatinine clearance as last resort. 1