How to evaluate a patient for sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction?

Evaluation for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Clinical Context Matters: Two Distinct Diagnostic Pathways

The evaluation approach differs fundamentally based on whether you suspect inflammatory sacroiliitis (axial spondyloarthritis) versus mechanical SI joint dysfunction—these require different diagnostic algorithms.

---

For Suspected Inflammatory Sacroiliitis (Axial Spondyloarthritis)

Initial Imaging: Start with Plain Radiographs

Begin with conventional radiography of the pelvis to evaluate the sacroiliac joints, which remains the first-line imaging modality despite its limitations. 1, 2

• Order anteroposterior pelvis radiographs (Ferguson views offer no superiority over standard AP views) 1
• Add cervical and lumbar spine radiographs at minimum if spine symptoms are present 1, 2
• Thoracic spine films are not broadly useful due to overlying structures unless specific symptoms warrant evaluation 1

Critical limitation: Radiographs miss more than 50% of patients with structural changes and lag behind clinical symptoms by 7+ years, with sensitivity of only 19-72% for early disease 1, 2

Second-Line Imaging: MRI When Radiographs Are Negative or Equivocal

If radiographs are negative or equivocal but clinical suspicion remains high, proceed directly to MRI of the sacroiliac joints—this is the gold standard for detecting early inflammatory disease. 1, 2

MRI Protocol Specifications:

• Required sequences: T1-weighted images PLUS fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive sequences (T2-weighted fat-saturated or STIR) 1, 2
• Contrast is generally unnecessary: MRI without contrast has 79% sensitivity and 89% specificity, and gadolinium has not been shown to significantly increase diagnostic accuracy 1, 2
• Consider contrast only if: You need to differentiate synovitis from joint fluid or improve conspicuity of subtle inflammatory lesions, but weigh this against cost, IV access needs, and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis risk 1

Important caveat: Bone marrow edema can appear in up to 30% of healthy controls—look specifically for deep lesions extending at least 1 cm below the articular surface, which are more specific for axial spondyloarthritis 2

Third-Line Imaging: Consider Spine MRI or CT in Select Cases

If SI joint radiographs and MRI are both negative but clinical suspicion persists, obtain MRI of the spine—isolated spine involvement occurs in 6-23% of cases. 1

• Use the same fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive sequences (STIR or T2 fat-sat) 1
• Sagittal imaging is the optimal plane for evaluating spinal lesions 1
• Standard spine MRI protocols for disc disease often lack the necessary fat suppression—specifically request sequences for inflammatory evaluation 1

CT has a limited role: Use only when radiographs are equivocal and you need better visualization of subtle erosions, sclerosis, or structural changes, but remember CT cannot detect active inflammation 1

Modalities to Avoid

Do not order these studies for routine evaluation: 1, 2

• Ultrasound (no supporting literature for SI joint evaluation)
• Bone scintigraphy/SPECT (low-to-moderate sensitivity, variable specificity)
• PET/CT (uncertain utility, not recommended for initial imaging)

---

For Suspected Mechanical SI Joint Dysfunction

Clinical Diagnosis: Physical Examination Maneuvers

Mechanical SI joint dysfunction is diagnosed clinically—imaging rarely establishes the diagnosis and is primarily used to exclude other pathology. 3, 4, 5

Physical Examination Strategy:

Perform 3-5 provocation tests consistently and consider the diagnosis positive when at least 3 tests reproduce the patient's pain. 3, 4, 5

• No single test is sufficiently sensitive or specific alone 3
• Multiple positive tests improve diagnostic accuracy 4, 5
• Select 3-5 tests you can easily perform and replicate, then use them consistently 3

Gold Standard Confirmation: Image-Guided Anesthetic Block

When clinical suspicion is high based on physical examination, confirm the diagnosis with fluoroscopy or CT-guided diagnostic SI joint injection using local anesthetic. 3, 6, 7

• Significant pain reduction following anesthetic injection is considered the gold standard for diagnosis 3, 7
• This distinguishes SI joint pain from other sources of low back pain 6, 7

Imaging Role is Limited

Imaging studies are generally unnecessary for diagnosing mechanical SI joint dysfunction unless specific history or physical examination findings suggest alternate etiologies. 3

• Use imaging primarily to rule out other pathology (fracture, infection, tumor) 4
• Plain radiographs or MRI may be obtained based on differential diagnosis considerations 4, 6

---

Key Diagnostic Pitfalls to Avoid

• Don't rely on radiographs alone for inflammatory disease: They have fair-to-moderate interobserver agreement and miss early disease 1, 2
• Don't assume all bone marrow edema on MRI is pathologic: Healthy controls can show edema; focus on deep lesions extending ≥1 cm from the articular surface 2
• Don't order standard spine MRI protocols for inflammatory evaluation: Ensure fat-suppressed sequences are included 1
• Don't use a single physical examination test to diagnose mechanical dysfunction: Require at least 3 positive provocation maneuvers 4, 5
• Don't forget the 7-year lag: Radiographic changes in inflammatory disease may not appear until years after symptom onset 1, 2