What is the appropriate diagnostic workup and treatment plan for a patient presenting with constipation, including a 6 marker study?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 15, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Six Marker Study for Constipation

The "6 marker study" refers to a colonic transit study using radiopaque markers, which is indicated only after failed empiric treatment with fiber and over-the-counter laxatives, and when slow-transit constipation is suspected based on clinical presentation. 1

When to Order the Six Marker Study

The American Gastroenterological Association recommends ordering colonic transit studies (including the radiopaque marker technique) only in specific clinical scenarios 1:

  • After failed empiric therapy: Patients must first undergo a 1-2 week trial of fiber supplementation and over-the-counter laxatives without adequate response 1, 2
  • When anorectal testing is normal: If anorectal manometry and balloon expulsion tests do not reveal defecatory disorders, proceed to transit assessment 2
  • Persistent symptoms despite treatment: When symptoms continue after addressing any identified defecatory disorders 1

Clinical Context: What the Study Evaluates

The six marker study specifically assesses for slow-transit constipation (STC), which is characterized by 2:

  • Reduced colonic propulsive activity
  • Increased uncoordinated distal colonic motor activity
  • Normal anorectal function (must be confirmed first)
  • Infrequency of bowel movements as the predominant symptom (rather than straining with soft stools) 2

Critical Diagnostic Sequence Before Ordering

Do not order the six marker study until completing this algorithmic workup 1, 2:

Step 1: Initial Assessment

  • Digital rectal examination assessing pelvic floor motion during simulated evacuation 1
  • Complete blood count (the only routinely necessary laboratory test) 1, 3
  • Corrected calcium and thyroid function only if clinically suspected based on other symptoms 4, 1

Step 2: Structural Evaluation (if indicated)

Colonoscopy is required first if any of these are present 1, 3:

  • Alarm symptoms (blood in stool, anemia, weight loss)
  • Age >50 without previous colorectal cancer screening
  • Abrupt onset of constipation

Step 3: Anorectal Function Testing

This must precede transit studies 2:

  • Anorectal manometry to assess sphincter function and pelvic floor coordination
  • Balloon expulsion test
  • These are indicated when digital rectal examination suggests dysfunction or when patients report prolonged straining, need for perineal/vaginal pressure to evacuate, or digital evacuation of stool 1

Step 4: Six Marker Study (Colonic Transit)

Only proceed if Steps 1-3 are completed and either 1, 2:

  • Anorectal tests show no defecatory disorder, OR
  • Symptoms persist despite treatment of identified defecatory disorder

Interpretation and Clinical Implications

The six marker study uses radiopaque markers ingested in a single capsule to assess colonic transit time 5. Results guide management:

  • Normal transit with normal anorectal function: Suggests normal transit constipation (NTC), often associated with irritable bowel syndrome features; managed with continued laxative therapy 2
  • Slow transit with normal anorectal function: Confirms slow-transit constipation; may require escalation to secretagogues, prokinetics, or in refractory cases, consideration of colectomy 6
  • Abnormal transit with defecatory disorder: Requires treatment of both components 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Ordering transit studies before anorectal testing: This sequence error misses defecatory disorders, which are more common and require different treatment (biofeedback therapy) 1, 6
  • Ordering without empiric treatment trial: The American Gastroenterological Association explicitly recommends against proceeding to specialized testing before attempting fiber and laxatives 1
  • Ordering excessive metabolic testing: Glucose, calcium, and thyroid tests should not be routinely ordered unless other clinical features warrant them 1, 3
  • Skipping structural evaluation in high-risk patients: Failure to perform colonoscopy when alarm features are present or age-appropriate screening is due can miss malignancy 1, 3

Treatment Algorithm Based on Results

Once slow-transit constipation is confirmed 6:

  1. First-line pharmacologic escalation: Osmotic laxatives (PEG 17g/day preferred) or stimulant laxatives (senna, bisacodyl) 4
  2. Second-line agents: Intestinal secretagogues (lubiprostone, linaclotide) or prokinetic agents 6
  3. Refractory cases: Consider colonic manometry/barostat to assess colonic motility; surgical colectomy may be necessary for specific patients with documented colonic dysmotility 6

The key principle is that the six marker study is a specialized test reserved for patients who have failed standard therapy and require differentiation between normal transit and slow-transit constipation to guide further management decisions. 1, 6

References

Guideline

Constipation Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Constipation Assessment and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Best Imaging Study for Evaluating Constipation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The evaluation of constipation.

Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2005

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.