Can subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) due to a blister aneurysm at the A1- Anterior Cerebral Artery (ACA) location be treated with endovascular flow diversion?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 16, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Blister Aneurysms at A1-ACA with Flow Diversion

Yes, endovascular flow diversion is a reasonable treatment option for ruptured blister aneurysms at the A1-ACA location to reduce mortality, though this represents a challenging clinical scenario with important caveats. 1

Guideline-Based Recommendation

The 2023 AHA/ASA guidelines specifically state that for patients with aSAH from ruptured fusiform/blister aneurysms, the use of flow diverters is reasonable to reduce mortality (Class 2a, Level C-LD). 1 This recommendation distinguishes blister aneurysms from typical saccular aneurysms, where flow diversion is explicitly contraindicated due to higher complication rates. 1

Critical Distinction from Saccular Aneurysms

  • Flow diverters should NOT be used for ruptured saccular aneurysms amenable to primary coiling or clipping due to increased complications (Class 3: Harm recommendation). 1
  • Blister aneurysms receive different treatment guidance because they are not amenable to conventional surgical clipping or primary coiling due to their fragile wall structure and broad-based morphology. 1

Clinical Evidence Supporting Flow Diversion

Efficacy Data

  • Immediate occlusion rates are high: Pipeline Embolic Device achieved immediate occlusion or near-occlusion in 9 of 10 patients with ruptured blister aneurysms, with complete occlusion on long-term follow-up (mean 15 months) in all survivors. 2
  • Favorable outcomes: In the dual-center series, 8 of 9 surviving patients achieved 90-day mRS of 0, with one patient achieving mRS of 1. 2
  • No procedure-related complications were observed in one series of 6 endovascularly treated patients, with no recurrent hemorrhage. 3

Location-Specific Considerations for A1 Segment

  • A1 blister aneurysms are particularly challenging due to their location and the fragile nature of the vessel wall. 4
  • Flow diversion has been successfully used even for anterior communicating artery complex blister aneurysms by deploying flow diverters in both A1/A2 junctions to exclude the aneurysm. 5
  • Parent vessel occlusion (surgical clipping or endovascular trapping) remains an alternative if the patient tolerates vessel sacrifice, though this is more commonly considered for ICA blister aneurysms. 4, 6

Treatment Algorithm for A1 Blister Aneurysms

Step 1: Confirm Diagnosis

  • High suspicion in setting of diffuse SAH with small, broad-based lesion on dorsal/medial wall of A1 segment. 4
  • Angiographic appearance may show wall irregularity rather than discrete aneurysm sac. 5

Step 2: Assess Treatment Options

  • Flow diversion is preferred if technically feasible, given guideline support for blister aneurysms. 1
  • Surgical options (direct clipping, wrapping, or parent vessel sacrifice) have historically shown high rates of regrowth and rebleeding. 2, 4
  • Conventional endovascular coiling (with or without stent/balloon assistance) shows high regrowth rates and should be avoided. 6

Step 3: Antiplatelet Management

  • Dual antiplatelet therapy is required for flow diversion, which increases hemorrhagic risk in acute SAH setting. 3
  • Load with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor prior to or immediately after device deployment. 3
  • This represents the primary risk of flow diversion in the acute hemorrhage setting. 1

Step 4: Follow-up Protocol

  • First angiographic follow-up at 6-7 months to assess complete occlusion. 2, 3
  • Monitor for mild, transient intimal hyperplasia (observed in 2 of 6 patients in one series, clinically asymptomatic). 3
  • Long-term surveillance necessary given historical concerns about durability. 2

Important Caveats and Pitfalls

Antiplatelet Therapy Risk

  • The requirement for dual antiplatelet therapy in the acute SAH period represents a significant hemorrhagic risk that must be weighed against rebleeding risk from untreated aneurysm. 3
  • This is the primary reason flow diverters carry a Class 3: Harm recommendation for typical saccular aneurysms. 1

Alternative Considerations

  • Parent vessel occlusion may be safer if collateral circulation is adequate, avoiding need for antiplatelet therapy. 4, 6
  • For A1 location specifically, assess contralateral A1 dominance and anterior communicating artery patency before considering vessel sacrifice. 5, 4

Timing

  • Early treatment is essential (within 24-72 hours) to reduce rebleeding risk, which is particularly high with blister aneurysms. 1
  • Flow diversion can be performed emergently in the acute SAH phase. 3, 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Microsurgical clipping and endovascular flow diversion of ruptured anterior circulation blood blister-like aneurysms.

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2018

Research

Endovascular exclusion of the anterior communicating artery with flow-diverter stents as an emergency treatment for blister-like intracranial aneurysms. A case report.

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2013

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.