What is the evidence for enzalutamide (generic name) in a patient with high-risk metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma to bone, based on which clinical trial?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 16, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Enzalutamide for High-Risk Metastatic Prostate Adenocarcinoma to Bone

Enzalutamide is a Category 1, preferred treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with bone metastases, supported primarily by the PREVAIL trial, which demonstrated a 29% reduction in mortality risk and significantly improved progression-free survival. 1

Primary Evidence: The PREVAIL Trial

The pivotal evidence comes from the PREVAIL trial (NCT01212991), a randomized, double-blind, phase III study that enrolled 1,717 chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic CRPC. 2 This trial was stopped early at interim analysis due to clear benefit in the treatment arm. 1

Key Efficacy Outcomes from PREVAIL:

  • Overall Survival: Median OS was 35.3 months with enzalutamide versus 31.3 months with placebo (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.60-0.84; P<0.001), representing a 29% reduction in death risk 1, 2

  • Radiographic Progression-Free Survival: 65% of enzalutamide patients remained progression-free at 12 months versus only 14% on placebo (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.15-0.23; P<0.001), representing an 81% risk reduction 2

  • Time to Chemotherapy Initiation: Median 28.0 months with enzalutamide versus 10.8 months with placebo (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.30-0.40) 2, 3

  • Time to First Skeletal-Related Event: Significantly delayed with enzalutamide (HR 0.72; P<0.001) 1, 2

  • PSA Response: 78% of patients achieved ≥50% PSA decline with enzalutamide versus 3% with placebo 2

Supporting Evidence and Comparative Trials

The TERRAIN and STRIVE trials provide additional evidence demonstrating enzalutamide's superiority over bicalutamide in treatment-naïve mCRPC:

  • TERRAIN study (n=375): Median PFS 15.7 months with enzalutamide versus 5.8 months with bicalutamide (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.34-0.57) 1, 4

  • STRIVE trial (n=396): 76% reduction in progression or death risk with enzalutamide versus bicalutamide (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.18-0.32) 1, 4

Guideline Recommendations

The NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) designates enzalutamide as a Category 1, preferred treatment option for patients with mCRPC without prior novel hormone therapy. 1, 4 This represents the highest level of evidence and consensus that the intervention is appropriate.

Safety Profile

The most common adverse events from PREVAIL include:

  • Fatigue: 33% versus 14% with placebo 1
  • Hypertension: 12% versus 5% with placebo 1
  • Major adverse cardiovascular events: 5% versus 3% with placebo 1
  • Mental impairment disorders: 5% versus 2% with placebo 1
  • Seizure risk: 0.6-0.9%, requiring permanent discontinuation if occurs 4, 5

Important caveat: Enzalutamide should be permanently discontinued immediately if seizure occurs during treatment. 5

Practical Administration

  • Dosing: 160 mg orally once daily 1, 2
  • No food restrictions for intake 1
  • Concurrent prednisone is permitted but not required 1
  • Continue LHRH agonist/antagonist therapy when using enzalutamide 4

Asian Population Validation

A separate Asian multiregional study (NCT02294461) with 388 patients confirmed enzalutamide's efficacy in chemotherapy-naïve Asian patients with mCRPC, showing median time to PSA progression of 8.31 months versus 2.86 months with placebo (HR 0.38; P<0.0001). 6 This validates the PREVAIL findings across diverse populations.

Cost Consideration

While enzalutamide is more expensive than bicalutamide, the superior efficacy profile and improved survival outcomes support its use as first-line therapy in appropriate patients. 1, 4

Related Questions

What are the risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide (anti-androgen therapy)?
What is the evidence for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) pelvis radiation and recommended dose for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer after progression on 3rd line enzalutamide (generic name: enzalutamide)?
Does Xtandi (enzalutamide) need to be held in patients with prostate cancer undergoing inguinal repair surgery?
Does Xtandi (Enzalutamide) need to be held prior to dental work?
Is it safe to resume Xtandi (enzalutamide) in a patient with prostate cancer who developed leg pain after starting the medication, despite unremarkable MRI and ultrasound results?
What is the most suitable anxiety medication for a 35-year-old male with no significant medical history?
What is the management approach for a young adult patient with a retrocecal appendix presenting with symptoms suggestive of appendicitis, such as abdominal pain, fever, and nausea?
How do overactive bladder (OAB) medications affect mucous production in patients, particularly those with a history of respiratory issues such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)?
What are the treatment options for a patient with trigger finger (stenosing tenosynovitis), particularly those with underlying medical conditions such as diabetes?
Does glycine slow gut motility like magnesium glycinate in patients with a history of gastrointestinal issues?
What is the best course of action for a female patient of childbearing age with rheumatoid arthritis and chronic anemia, presenting with dizziness, weakness, and exhaustion, and laboratory results indicating iron deficiency anemia, who is currently taking liquid iron twice daily with vitamin C, vitamin D, and a prenatal vitamin?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.