What is the recommended screening and management approach for a 65-year-old patient with a history of smoking, diabetes, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol who is at risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and may benefit from Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) screening?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 16, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ABI Screening for High-Risk 65-Year-Old Patient

This 65-year-old patient with multiple cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia) should undergo resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) screening, as they meet established criteria for increased PAD risk and early detection can guide intensive cardiovascular risk reduction strategies. 1

Who Should Be Screened

Your patient clearly qualifies for ABI screening based on multiple guideline criteria:

  • Age ≥65 years alone is sufficient to warrant screening according to ACC/AHA guidelines 1
  • The combination of diabetes, smoking history, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia further strengthens the indication, as these four risk factors account for 75% of all PAD cases 1
  • The 2024 ESC guidelines specifically recommend ABI screening for asymptomatic individuals aged ≥65 years, particularly women, and at younger ages when cardiovascular risk factors are present 1

Important caveat: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) found insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening in asymptomatic adults, citing lack of trials showing that screening improves patient outcomes 1. However, this conservative stance contrasts with ACC/AHA and ESC recommendations that emphasize the value of risk stratification and intensified preventive therapy 1.

How to Perform ABI Screening

The resting ABI is the required first-line diagnostic test with the following technique: 1, 2

  • Obtain systolic blood pressures at both brachial arteries and both ankle arteries (dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial) using a handheld Doppler device 1, 2
  • Calculate ABI for each leg by dividing the higher ankle pressure by the higher arm pressure 1, 2
  • Also measure blood pressure in both arms initially, as an inter-arm difference >15-20 mmHg suggests subclavian stenosis 2

Interpreting ABI Results

Report results using these standardized thresholds: 1

  • ABI ≤0.90: Diagnostic for PAD (80% sensitivity, 95% specificity) 1
  • ABI 0.91-0.99: Borderline—consider repeat testing or exercise ABI if symptomatic 1
  • ABI 1.00-1.40: Normal 1
  • ABI >1.40: Noncompressible vessels (common in diabetes)—requires alternative testing 1

Critical consideration for this diabetic patient: ABI accuracy is lower in patients with diabetes due to medial arterial calcification causing falsely elevated readings 1. If ABI >1.40, proceed immediately to alternative testing such as toe-brachial index (TBI), with TBI <0.70 diagnostic for PAD 1.

What to Do Based on Results

If ABI ≤0.90 (PAD Confirmed)

Reclassify this patient to very high cardiovascular risk and initiate aggressive medical management: 1

  • Antiplatelet therapy: Clopidogrel 75 mg daily is preferred over aspirin for symptomatic PAD 1, 3
  • High-intensity statin therapy: Target LDL-C <55 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) with >50% reduction from baseline 1
  • Blood pressure control: Target SBP 120-129 mmHg if tolerated 1
  • Diabetes management: Prioritize SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists with proven cardiovascular benefit 1
  • Smoking cessation: This is the single most important modifiable intervention 1

If ABI 0.91-0.99 (Borderline)

  • Consider exercise treadmill ABI testing if the patient develops exertional leg symptoms 1
  • The usefulness of antiplatelet therapy in borderline ABI is uncertain (Class IIb evidence), but intensive risk factor modification is still warranted 1

If ABI 1.00-1.40 (Normal)

  • Reassess every 2-3 years given the patient's high-risk profile 1
  • Continue aggressive cardiovascular risk factor management regardless of ABI result 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not skip screening in diabetic patients due to concerns about calcification—instead, plan for TBI measurement if ABI is noncompressible 1. The 2019 ESC diabetes guidelines specifically recommend ABI-based screening once at diabetes diagnosis, then after 10 years if initially normal (or after 5 years if other risk factors like smoking exist) 1.

Do not assume a normal ABI excludes significant cardiovascular risk—this patient requires intensive risk factor modification regardless of ABI results given their multiple risk factors 1. An abnormal ABI primarily serves to reclassify intermediate-risk patients to high-risk status, justifying more aggressive preventive therapy 1.

Do not order anatomic imaging (duplex ultrasound, CTA, MRA) for asymptomatic PAD—these studies are reserved for symptomatic patients being considered for revascularization 1.

Surveillance Strategy

If initial ABI is normal in this high-risk patient:

  • Repeat ABI screening every 2-3 years 1
  • Perform annual clinical assessment for new symptoms (claudication, rest pain, nonhealing wounds) and pulse examination 1
  • In diabetic patients with normal resting ABI, consider TBI measurement to detect early disease 1

The yield of PAD screening averages 17% overall but ranges from 1-4% in lower-risk populations to 42% in high-risk groups 4. Given this patient's multiple risk factors, the pre-test probability of detecting PAD is substantially elevated, making screening particularly valuable 5.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

What is the role of Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) testing in diagnosing Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)?
What is the management plan for a patient with abnormal Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) and Toe-Brachial Index (TBI) results, indicating severe Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)?
What is the management plan for an individual with an abnormal Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) result?
What is the recommended management for a patient with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) presenting with pain and discoloration in toes, intermittent hand and feet swelling, and significant arterial narrowing on CTA?
What is the management plan for a patient with mild peripheral artery disease indicated by an Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) of 0.85 on the left and 0.83 on the right?
What is the recommended dose of tranexamic acid (TXA) for a female patient of reproductive age with menorrhagia and no history of thromboembolic events?
How to differentiate and manage Lower Motor Neuron (LMN) vs Upper Motor Neuron (UMN) lesions in a patient with neurological symptoms?
What is the best management approach for a previously healthy adult with painful oral ulcers and a very painful throat, without genital ulcers or fever?
What is the best approach for an older man with a past medical history (PMH) of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA), erectile dysfunction (ED), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), dyslipidemia, hypertension (HTN), osteoarthritis (OA), thrombocytopenia (low platelets), tremor, lymphopenia (low lymphocytes), poor balance, Schatzki's ring, hiatal hernia, chronic gastritis, diverticulosis, and internal hemorrhoids, who presents with weight loss and diminished appetite, after a chest computed tomography (CT) scan, Galleri test, endoscopic examinations, and laboratory tests have failed to reveal a cause?
What alternative pain management option can be used for an osteoporotic female patient with cough and breathlessness, currently prescribed Etoricoxib (90mg three times a day) and Gabapentin (600mg twice a day), to minimize the risk of respiratory distress?
What is the preferred initial diagnostic approach, core biopsy or excisional biopsy, for a patient with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer and a neck node of unknown primary origin?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.