Advanced Monoclonal Antibodies: Clinical Applications and Management
Trastuzumab (Herceptin) for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
For first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab plus a taxane (docetaxel or paclitaxel) for at least six cycles is the standard of care, regardless of hormone receptor status. 1
Indications and Dosing
- First-line setting: Applies to patients with de novo metastatic disease or those whose disease relapsed ≥12 months after prior HER2-targeting adjuvant therapy 1
- Standard regimen: Trastuzumab + pertuzumab + taxane for ≥6 cycles, followed by maintenance with trastuzumab + pertuzumab (plus endocrine therapy if HR-positive) 1
- Patients with chemotherapy contraindications: Trastuzumab + pertuzumab alone (HR-negative disease) or with endocrine therapy (HR-positive disease) 1
Critical Safety Considerations
- Cardiotoxicity: The primary dose-limiting toxicity; use with anthracyclines is problematic due to cardiac dysfunction risk 2
- Cerebral metastases: The rate of brain metastases development is 2.8-times higher in patients receiving trastuzumab 2
- Contraindications: Avoid in patients with pre-existing cardiac dysfunction or recent cardiovascular disease 1
Treatment Sequencing After Progression
- Second-line: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is preferred following progression on trastuzumab/pertuzumab/taxane 1
- Alternative second-line: T-DM1 when T-DXd is unavailable or unsuitable (e.g., interstitial lung disease) 1
Rituximab (Rituxan) for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rituximab should be reserved for rheumatoid arthritis patients who have failed TNF inhibitors due to inadequate response, or as first-line biologic therapy only under specific circumstances including recent lymphoma, latent tuberculosis with contraindications to chemoprophylaxis, TB-endemic regions, or prior demyelinating disease. 1
Indications and Patient Selection
- Standard indication: After inadequate response to TNF inhibitors 1
- First-line biologic use (specific circumstances only): 1
- Recent history of lymphoma
- Latent tuberculosis with contraindications to chemoprophylaxis
- Living in TB-endemic region
- Previous demyelinating disease
- Recent history of any malignancy (no evidence rituximab is associated with cancer occurrence) 1
Dosing and Administration
- Combination therapy required: Must be used with methotrexate or other conventional synthetic DMARDs for optimal efficacy 1
- Monotherapy: Has not been consistently superior to methotrexate alone 1
Mandatory Pre-Treatment Screening
All patients must undergo tuberculosis screening before initiating rituximab: 1
- Tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) required regardless of risk factors 1
- Use IGRA over TST in patients with prior BCG vaccination (high false-positive TST rates) 1
- Positive TST/IGRA requires chest radiograph and sputum examination if radiograph suggests TB exposure 1
Contraindications in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Do not use rituximab in patients with: 1
- Untreated chronic Hepatitis B 1
- Treated chronic Hepatitis B with Child-Pugh Class B or higher 1
- Active hepatitis requiring treatment 1
Safety Profile
- Infusion reactions: Most common adverse event (77% with first infusion, decreasing with subsequent infusions) 3
- Infections: Serious infections occur in <5% of patients; overall infection rate 31% (bacterial 19%, viral 10%) 3
- Cytopenias: Grade 3-4 cytopenias in 48% (lymphopenia 40%, neutropenia 6%) 3
- Hypogammaglobulinemia: Monitor immunoglobulin levels; median lymphopenia duration 14 days 3
- Serious cardiopulmonary reactions: Fatal in approximately 0.04-0.07% of patients 4
Rituximab for Multiple Sclerosis (Off-Label Use)
For relapsing MS as first-choice treatment, rituximab likely delays relapse compared to interferon beta/glatiramer acetate and may delay relapse compared to dimethyl fumarate and natalizumab, though evidence on disability worsening remains uncertain. 5
Efficacy as First-Choice Treatment
- Versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate: Likely delays relapse (HR 0.14,95% CI 0.05-0.39) 5
- Versus dimethyl fumarate: May delay relapse (HR 0.29,95% CI 0.08-1.00) 5
- Versus natalizumab: May delay relapse (HR 0.24,95% CI 0.06-1.00) 5
- Disability worsening: Evidence remains uncertain across all comparisons 5
Efficacy as Switching Treatment
- Versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate: Likely delays relapse (HR 0.18,95% CI 0.07-0.49) 5
- Versus fingolimod: Likely delays relapse (HR 0.08,95% CI 0.02-0.32) 5
- Versus natalizumab: May result in little to no difference in relapse (HR 0.96,95% CI 0.83-1.10) 5
Critical Safety Concern in MS
Rituximab likely increases serious common infections compared to interferon beta/glatiramer acetate (OR 1.71,95% CI 1.11-2.62) and natalizumab (OR 1.58,95% CI 1.08-2.32), though absolute risk remains low. 5
Primary Progressive MS
- Rituximab likely results in little or no difference in disability worsening compared to placebo (OR 0.71,95% CI 0.45-1.11) 5
- Evidence on other outcomes remains very uncertain 5
COVID-19 Pandemic Considerations for Monoclonal Antibodies
Rituximab Dosing Modifications
During periods requiring reduced healthcare contact, extend rituximab dosing intervals: 1
- Maintenance therapy in follicular lymphoma: Consider reporting or removing maintenance cycles 1
- Avoid rituximab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia induction when combined with venetoclax; prefer alternative therapies 1
Trastuzumab Considerations
- Cardiotoxic agents including trastuzumab should be reconsidered if alternatives are available, given cardiac involvement prevalence with COVID-19 1
- Treatment continuation with monitoring via telemedicine is appropriate for stable patients 1
Immunotherapy in Special Populations
Autoimmune Disease
For patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease requiring medication, 94% of expert consensus recommends against combination immunotherapy (e.g., nivolumab/ipilimumab) for intermediate/poor risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma. 1
- Retrospective data in melanoma showed 20% objective response rate with ipilimumab in patients with autoimmune disorders 1
- 50% experienced neither autoimmune flare nor grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events 1
- Anti-PD-1 therapy showed 33% objective response rate with manageable toxicity (30% developed additional immune-related adverse events) 1
Corticosteroid Use
- 75% of expert consensus recommends against treating patients receiving >10 mg/day prednisone equivalent with combination immunotherapy 1
Viral Infections
HIV, Hepatitis B/C patients can receive immune checkpoint inhibitors with appropriate monitoring: 1
- HIV patients: 24% any-grade immune-related adverse events, 10% grade ≥3,29% objective response rate 1
- HBV/HCV patients: 50% any-grade immune-related adverse events, 26% grade ≥3,21% objective response rate, no viral reactivation noted 1
Common Pitfalls and Critical Warnings
Hepatitis B Reactivation
- Screen all patients for hepatitis B before initiating rituximab 3
- Fulminant hepatitis with hepatic failure and death can occur 3
Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML)
Tumor Lysis Syndrome
- Occurs within 12-24 hours after first rituximab infusion 4
- Estimated incidence 0.04-0.05% of patients 4
- Higher risk with high circulating malignant cell counts, pulmonary infiltrates, or prior cardiovascular disease 4
Severe Mucocutaneous Reactions
- Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis have been reported with rituximab 3
- Discontinue rituximab and consider dermatologic consultation 3