Risk of Cancer with Hormonal Birth Control
Hormonal birth control is associated with a small increased risk of breast and cervical cancer, but provides substantial protection against ovarian and endometrial cancer, with the overall cancer risk-benefit profile being neutral to favorable over the long term. 1, 2
Breast Cancer Risk
Current or recent users of combined hormonal contraceptives have a relative risk of breast cancer of approximately 1.20-1.24, representing about 1 extra breast cancer per 7,690 women using hormonal contraception for 1 year. 2, 3
Key Risk Patterns:
- The relative risk increases with duration of use, ranging from 1.09 with less than 1 year of use to 1.38 with more than 10 years of use 3
- The elevated risk completely disappears within 10 years after discontinuation, indicating this is related to active hormonal exposure rather than permanent carcinogenic effects 2, 4
- Women under age 34 have the highest relative risk increase, but their absolute risk remains extremely low due to the rarity of breast cancer in young women 2
- Current breast cancer is an absolute contraindication (Category 4) to hormonal contraceptives because breast cancer is hormonally sensitive and prognosis may worsen 1, 2, 5
- Past breast cancer with no evidence of disease for 5 years is Category 3 (risks usually outweigh benefits) 1, 5
Special Populations:
Women with family history of breast cancer or BRCA1/2 mutations do NOT have amplified risk from oral contraceptives compared to their already elevated baseline risk. 1, 2 Current evidence shows no significant modification of breast cancer risk by oral contraceptive use in BRCA carriers, with meta-analyses showing no significant association 2
Cervical Cancer Risk
Long-term use (≥5 years) of combined hormonal contraceptives may increase the risk of cervical carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma among women with persistent HPV infection. 1
- Cervical ectropion is NOT a risk factor for cervical cancer, and restriction of hormonal contraceptive use is unnecessary 1
- Women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia can use hormonal contraceptives (Category 2) 1
- Cervical cancer awaiting treatment is Category 2, as women may use hormonal contraceptives while awaiting treatment 1
Cancer-Protective Benefits
Ovarian Cancer:
Combined oral contraceptives reduce ovarian cancer risk by 40-60%, with protection increasing with longer duration of use and persisting for at least 10 years after discontinuation. 2, 6, 4
- The risk reduction is approximately 50% for use of one year or more 6
- For BRCA1/2 carriers facing high ovarian cancer risk, oral contraceptives reduce ovarian cancer risk by 45-60%, making them particularly valuable 2
- This substantial benefit is a critical consideration in the overall risk-benefit calculation 2
Endometrial Cancer:
Oral contraceptives reduce endometrial cancer risk by approximately 50% in ever-users, with greater benefit with increasing duration of use. 1, 2, 6, 4
- The protective effect lasts for at least 10 years after discontinuation 6
- Women with endometrial cancer awaiting treatment may use hormonal contraceptives (Category 1) 1
Colorectal Cancer:
Hormonal contraceptive use is associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk. 1, 2
Overall Cancer Balance
Long-term cohort studies with 30+ years of follow-up show an overall neutral balance between short-term cancer risks and long-term cancer benefits in past oral contraceptive users. 1, 2
- A study of 46,022 women in the United Kingdom demonstrated no increased overall cancer incidence or mortality among ever-users 1
- Multiple large prospective cohort studies have not observed increased overall cancer risk 4
Clinical Decision Algorithm
Step 1: Screen for Absolute Contraindications
- Current breast cancer → Do NOT prescribe hormonal contraceptives (Category 4) 1, 5
- Breast cancer with no evidence of disease for <5 years → Generally avoid (Category 3) 1, 5
Step 2: Assess Individual Risk Factors
- Age <35 years with no contraindications → Hormonal contraceptives are appropriate; absolute breast cancer risk remains very low despite small relative risk increase 2
- Family history of breast cancer or BRCA carrier → Hormonal contraceptives are acceptable; evidence does not support amplified risk, and substantial ovarian cancer protection is particularly valuable 1, 2
- Age ≥35 years who smoke ≥15 cigarettes/day → Absolute contraindication due to cardiovascular risk, not cancer risk 1, 5, 7
Step 3: Contextualize Risk Based on Indication
- If prescribed for contraception: Compare risks against those of unintended pregnancy, which carries higher VTE risk (5-20 per 10,000 person-years in pregnancy vs 3-9 in oral contraceptive users) 1
- If prescribed exclusively for acne: Compare risks against those of acne alone, not pregnancy 1
Step 4: Emphasize Protective Benefits
- Counsel patients about the 40-60% reduction in ovarian cancer risk 2, 4
- Counsel about the 50% reduction in endometrial cancer risk 6, 4
- Explain that the small breast cancer risk elevation is temporary and disappears within 10 years of stopping 2, 4
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do NOT overestimate absolute breast cancer risk in young women: A relative risk of 1.2-1.4 in a 25-year-old translates to minimal absolute risk increase (approximately 1 extra case per 7,690 woman-years) given the rarity of breast cancer at that age 2, 3
- Do NOT assume past oral contraceptive use permanently increases cancer risk: The breast cancer risk elevation resolves within 10 years of discontinuation 2, 4
- Do NOT unnecessarily restrict hormonal contraceptives in women with family history or BRCA mutations: Evidence does not support significantly amplified breast cancer risk, and the substantial ovarian cancer protection is particularly valuable in this population 1, 2
- Do NOT ignore the substantial cancer-protective benefits: The 40-60% ovarian cancer risk reduction and 50% endometrial cancer risk reduction are clinically significant and durable 2, 6, 4
- Do NOT require routine cancer screening before initiation: Breast examination, cervical cytology, and other screening tests are not necessary before initiating hormonal contraceptives in asymptomatic women 1, 5