Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH): Diagnosis and Treatment
Diagnostic Approach
Diagnose HLH using the HLH-2004 criteria, which requires either molecular diagnosis consistent with HLH or fulfillment of 5 of 8 criteria: fever, splenomegaly, cytopenias (affecting ≥2 cell lines), hypertriglyceridemia and/or hypofibrinogenemia, hemophagocytosis in bone marrow/spleen/lymph nodes, low or absent NK cell activity, ferritin ≥500 μg/L, and elevated soluble CD25 (sIL-2 receptor). 1
Key Diagnostic Considerations
Ferritin is the most practical screening parameter when HLH is suspected in patients presenting with the triad of fever, cytopenia, and organomegaly, though it must be interpreted in clinical context 2
Hemophagocytosis itself is neither sensitive nor specific for HLH and may be present in sepsis and other conditions, so do not rely on this finding alone 1
HLH presents with a phenotype indistinguishable from sepsis or multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, making it a critical differential diagnosis in deteriorating ICU patients who fail to respond to standard sepsis management 1, 2
In male patients with lymphoma and EBV-driven HLH, strongly consider genetic or flow cytometric analysis for X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome 1 (XLP1), which is characterized by HLH at primary EBV infection, hypogammaglobulinemia, and lymphoma 3
Classification That Guides Treatment
Primary (genetic) HLH is caused by mutations affecting lymphocyte cytotoxicity and immune regulation, most common in children but can occur in adolescents and young adults 1
Secondary (acquired) HLH is most common in adults and triggered by infections (especially EBV, CMV), malignancies (particularly T-cell lymphomas), autoimmune/autoinflammatory disorders, or immunotherapies 1
Treatment Algorithm
Immediate Management Based on Clinical Stability
For rapidly deteriorating or unstable patients: Start corticosteroids (dexamethasone 10 mg/m²/day or methylprednisolone) immediately with or without IVIG, and initiate etoposide 150 mg/m² twice weekly for 2 weeks then weekly. 1, 4
For stable patients with transient HLH responding to disease-specific treatment: Watchful waiting may be appropriate, but maintain a low threshold to initiate full protocol if deterioration occurs. 1, 4
Standard HLH-94 Protocol Components
The HLH-94 protocol remains the recommended standard treatment, consisting of: 1
Dexamethasone 10 mg/m²/day to suppress inflammatory cytokine production 1, 4
Etoposide 150 mg/m² twice weekly for 2 weeks, then weekly - highly effective against T-cell proliferation and cytokine secretion 1, 4
Cyclosporine A (2-7 mg/kg/day) added after 8 weeks in HLH-94 (or upfront in HLH-2004 protocol) 1, 4
Intrathecal therapy only for progressive neurological symptoms after 2 weeks of therapy or if abnormal cerebrospinal fluid has not improved 1
Critical Dosing Modifications for Adults
In adult patients, especially elderly: Reduce etoposide frequency to once weekly instead of twice weekly and/or reduce dosing to 50-100 mg/m² instead of 150 mg/m² due to vulnerability to end-organ damage. 1
Keep cumulative etoposide dose below 2-3 g/m² to minimize risk of secondary malignancies, particularly in non-malignancy associated HLH. 1, 4
Treatment Based on HLH Subtype
Primary (Genetic) HLH
Complete the full HLH-94 protocol followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), as this is the only curative approach. 1
- Achieving inactive HLH before transplantation strongly correlates with better survival 1
Malignancy-Associated HLH
Use a combined approach with simultaneous HLH-directed and malignancy-directed therapy, as etoposide-containing regimens show better survival compared to treating the underlying malignancy alone. 3, 1, 4
Consider lymphoma regimens containing etoposide, cyclophosphamide, or methotrexate (such as CHOEP), as these agents may treat both HLH and the underlying neoplasm in murine models 3, 1
AlloSCT may be considered as consolidation in patients with HLH in the context of hematologic malignancy 1
Strongly consider postponing subsequent chemotherapy blocks or interrupting maintenance therapy except in cases of neoplasm relapse 1
Implement rigorous anti-infectious prophylaxis (anti-fungal, pneumocystis jiroveci) and regular surveillance for secondary infections (aspergillus, EBV, CMV) 1
Infection-Associated HLH (Especially EBV)
Anti-infectious treatment is pivotal and must be initiated immediately alongside HLH-directed therapy. 1, 4
For EBV-associated HLH: Add rituximab 375 mg/m² once weekly for 2-4 doses to clear the viral reservoir, with monitoring of EBV DNA levels, ferritin, and soluble CD25 to guide the number of doses needed. 5, 4
Consider IVIG at 1.6 g/kg over 2-3 days for its anti-inflammatory effects 5
For patients with continuously increasing or sustained high levels of EBV DNA, consider hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 5
Autoimmune/Autoinflammatory-Associated HLH (Macrophage Activation Syndrome)
Use anti-interleukin-1 treatment in addition to glucocorticosteroids, cyclosporin A, and etoposide. 3, 1
Refractory or Relapsed Disease
If inadequate response within 24-48 hours to initial therapy, consider treatment intensification with: 1, 4
Cytokine adsorption using filter columns or plasma exchange 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not mistake HLH for refractory sepsis - if a patient with "sepsis" deteriorates despite standard care with fever, cytopenia, and organomegaly, immediately check ferritin and consider HLH 2
Do not wait for bone marrow hemophagocytosis to diagnose HLH - this finding is neither sensitive nor specific and delays treatment 1
Do not treat with immunosuppression alone without addressing the underlying trigger - simultaneous treatment of both HLH and its cause is essential 1, 4
Do not use standard sepsis protocols for HLH - treatment is fundamentally different and requires immunosuppression rather than immune support 2
Prognostic Factors
Malignancy-associated HLH carries the worst prognosis with 30-day survival of 56-70%, median overall survival of 36-230 days, and 3-year survival of 18-55% depending on subtype. 1
The HLH-94 protocol has improved survival from nearly uniformly fatal to >50% long-term survival in primary HLH. 1
Factors associated with higher mortality include: shock at ICU admission, platelet count <30 g/L, malignancy-associated HLH (particularly T-cell lymphoma), and secondary infections 1, 5