What is the success rate of Bulkamid (polyacrylamide hydrogel) for treating stress urinary incontinence in adult women?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 17, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Bulkamid Success Rate for Stress Urinary Incontinence

Bulkamid (polyacrylamide hydrogel) demonstrates a 67-77% cure or improvement rate at long-term follow-up (3-7 years) for women with stress urinary incontinence, though this is lower than midurethral slings and repeat injections are commonly needed. 1, 2

Evidence-Based Success Rates

Primary Procedure Success

  • At 7 years post-injection, 67.1% of patients reported cure or improvement when Bulkamid was used as a primary procedure for stress urinary incontinence 2
  • At 3-year follow-up, 82% of patients reported cure or significant improvement, with this high satisfaction rate maintained at final follow-up 3
  • In a multicenter North American randomized trial, 53.2% achieved ≥50% reduction in leakage episodes at 12 months, with 47.2% reporting zero stress incontinence episodes 4
  • At 12 months in a multicenter study, 66% subjective response rate was observed, with incontinence episodes decreasing from 3.0 to 0.7 per 24 hours 5

Comparative Effectiveness

  • The AUA/SUFU guidelines note that polyacrylamide hydrogel demonstrated lower satisfaction rates compared with TVT (tension-free vaginal tape) in a recent RCT, though the majority of women treated with Bulkamid were still considered cured or improved at 3-year follow-up 1
  • This finding suggests patients may choose the less invasive urethral bulking injection over sling surgery despite lower success rates 1

Critical Considerations for Patient Selection

Need for Repeat Injections

  • Re-injection is commonly required with all bulking agents, and patients must be counseled on this expected need 1
  • In the 7-year study, 35% of patients required reinjection 2
  • 19.5% of patients ultimately received a subsequent other incontinence procedure by 7 years, indicating treatment failure requiring escalation 2

Quality of Life Improvements

  • ICIQ-UI SF scores decreased by 8.6 points at 7-year follow-up 2
  • VAS Quality of Life scores improved by a mean of 4.3 points 2
  • The median ICIQ score was reduced to approximately 50% of baseline 5

Safety Profile

Complications

  • No erosions were noted in polyacrylamide hydrogel patients, unlike other bulking agents in multiple studies 1
  • Postoperative complications were transient: prolonged bladder emptying time in 15.3% and urinary tract infection in 3.5% 2
  • No polyacrylamide hydrogel-specific adverse events were identified in multicenter studies 5
  • Major adverse events were rare, with an overall complication rate of approximately 13% 6

Clinical Algorithm for Bulkamid Use

Appropriate Patient Population

Bulkamid should be considered for patients who:

  • Wish to avoid more invasive surgical management or lengthier recovery time after surgery 1
  • Experience insufficient improvement following an anti-incontinence procedure 1
  • Have stress urinary incontinence or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence 2, 6
  • Are willing to accept the possibility of repeat injections 1

When NOT to Use Bulkamid

The AUA/SUFU guidelines indicate bulking agents have suboptimal outcomes in:

  • Patients with fixed immobile urethra, where autologous pubovaginal sling is preferred 1
  • Patients seeking single-procedure definitive treatment with highest success rates 1

Durability Data

Polyacrylamide hydrogel has the longest persistence of effect among bulking agents at 96 months, compared to calcium hydroxyapatite (73.2 months) and polydimethylsiloxane (83 months) 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Failing to counsel patients preoperatively about the expected need for repeat injections leads to unrealistic expectations 1
  • Not discussing comparative success rates with midurethral slings (which have higher cure rates) prevents truly informed decision-making 1
  • Using bulking agents in patients with fixed immobile urethra, where outcomes are particularly poor 1
  • Inadequate data exist to support recommendation of one injectable agent over another, so choice should be based on availability and surgeon experience 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.