What is the survival rate for an adult with no significant past medical history diagnosed with type B aortic dissection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 18, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Survival Rate of Type B Aortic Dissection

Type B aortic dissection has an in-hospital mortality of approximately 14% with medical management, with 1-year survival of 70% and 2-year survival of 60%. 1

Acute Phase Mortality (First 30 Days)

The most recent ESC guidelines report that in-hospital mortality for acute type B aortic dissection has remained stable at 14% over recent decades, which is substantially better than type A dissection. 1 However, when including deaths before hospital admission, 30-day mortality ranges from 23% to 55.8% in Western Europe. 1

Complicated vs. Uncomplicated Disease

The distinction between complicated and uncomplicated dissection dramatically affects survival:

  • Uncomplicated type B dissection treated medically has a 30-day mortality of approximately 2.4%. 2
  • Complicated type B dissection (with rupture, malperfusion, uncontrolled hypertension, or rapid expansion) has significantly higher mortality:
    • TEVAR treatment: 7.3% 30-day mortality 2
    • Open surgical repair: 19.0% 30-day mortality 2
    • Medical therapy alone: 14% 30-day mortality 1

Initial Hospitalization Outcomes

In patients receiving initial conservative medical treatment, hospital mortality is 17.6%, with main causes of death being rupture (42%), intestinal malperfusion (39%), and cardiac failure (9%). 3 An additional 5% of medically managed patients require conversion to early surgery during initial hospitalization due to complications. 3

Long-Term Survival

1-5 Year Outcomes

The European Cooperative study demonstrated:

  • 1-year survival: 70% 1
  • 2-year survival: 60% 1
  • 5-year survival: 50-80% depending on management strategy 4

After primary conservative therapy, actuarial survival rates are 76% at 5 years and 50% at 8 years. 3

Factors Affecting Long-Term Prognosis

The degree of communication between true and false lumens significantly impacts survival, with best prognosis found in non-communicating and retrograde type B dissection limited to the descending aorta (80-86% 2-year survival). 1

Independent predictors of long-term mortality include:

  • Renal insufficiency (OR 4.7) 5
  • Coexistent aortic disease (OR 4.1) 5
  • Partial false lumen thrombosis 4
  • Aortic diameter >5 cm at presentation 3

Late Complications Affecting Survival

Despite surviving the acute phase, 25-30% of patients develop aortic aneurysm formation within 4 years, requiring delayed surgical intervention. 4 Surgery for chronic dissection carries an 8% hospital mortality. 3

Spontaneous healing of type B dissection is rare (occurring in only 7-31% depending on imaging modality), particularly when large entry tears maintain continuous flow through the false lumen. 1

Critical Prognostic Considerations

High-Risk Features Requiring Intervention

Patients with the following features have worse outcomes and may benefit from early TEVAR rather than medical management alone:

  • Age <60 years with aortic diameter ≥5 cm 3
  • Marfan syndrome 3
  • Limited false aneurysm or retrograde dissection into aortic arch 3
  • Poor medical compliance or uncontrollable proximal hypertension 3

TEVAR vs. Medical Management

The INSTEAD-XL trial showed that while 2-year outcomes were similar, at 5 years TEVAR demonstrated lower aorta-related mortality (6.9% vs. 19.3%) and disease progression (27.0% vs. 46.1%) compared to medical therapy alone. 1 However, total mortality showed no difference. 1

Common Pitfalls

Delay in diagnosis significantly worsens outcomes, as only 15% of cases were diagnosed before death in historical population-based studies. 1

Shock due to rupture is strongly associated with in-hospital mortality (p=0.006), making rapid hemodynamic stabilization critical. 5

The survival advantage of type B over type A dissection (70% vs. 52% at 1 year) can create false reassurance—long-term vigilance is essential as 30% develop morbidity including aneurysm degeneration over 5 years despite surviving the acute phase. 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.