Can Doppler (duplex) ultrasound underestimate pressure measurement in patients with suspected iliac artery stenosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 18, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Can Doppler Ultrasound Underestimate Pressure Measurements in Iliac Artery Stenosis?

Yes, duplex Doppler ultrasound frequently underestimates the severity of iliac artery stenosis and cannot reliably measure pressure gradients in this anatomic location. 1

Why Doppler Fails in the Iliac Arteries

Accuracy of duplex ultrasound is significantly diminished in the iliac arteries due to several technical limitations:

  • Bowel gas and vessel tortuosity commonly obscure the iliac vessels, preventing adequate visualization and accurate velocity measurements 1
  • Dense calcification obscures flow assessment, particularly when flow velocity is already reduced, leading to underestimation of stenosis severity 1, 2
  • Limited sonographic windows result in nondiagnostic segments of the aorta and iliac arteries 1
  • Multiple sequential "tandem" stenotic segments cause duplex ultrasound to underestimate the extent of disease 1, 3

The Pressure Gradient Problem

Doppler-derived pressure gradients show poor correlation with actual measured pressures in clinical practice:

  • While Doppler calculations using the modified Bernoulli equation correlate well in experimental settings (r=0.78), they perform poorly in clinical iliac artery studies (r=0.54) with unacceptably high variability (SD=28 mmHg) 4
  • Doppler consistently overestimates pressure gradients in mild stenoses but may miss hemodynamically significant lesions due to poor beam alignment 4, 5
  • The absence of reverse flow in diastole is a more reliable indicator of hemodynamically significant stenosis (>15 mmHg gradient) than calculated pressure gradients 4

The Gold Standard Alternative

Catheter angiography with direct pressure measurement remains the gold standard for hemodynamic assessment:

  • Direct intraluminal pressure measurements, particularly after vasodilator administration (papaverine), accurately identify hemodynamically significant lesions 2, 6
  • Arteriography alone is not an accurate indicator of hemodynamic significance, especially in 50-75% stenoses where pressure measurements are most valuable 6
  • Simultaneous pressure recording at multiple sites is essential because variations in aortic and femoral artery pressures occur following vasodilatation 6

Practical Clinical Algorithm

For suspected iliac artery stenosis requiring intervention planning:

  1. Initial screening: Use duplex ultrasound with ankle-brachial index (ABI), recognizing that resting ABIs are frequently normal in isolated iliac disease 7, 3

  2. Definitive anatomic imaging: Obtain CT angiography of abdomen/pelvis with bilateral lower extremity runoff (sensitivity and specificity 90-100%) for treatment planning 2, 7, 3

  3. Functional assessment: Perform exercise/treadmill ABI to unmask hemodynamically significant proximal disease that appears normal at rest 7

  4. Hemodynamic confirmation: Reserve catheter angiography with direct pressure measurement for cases where non-invasive imaging shows borderline stenosis or when clinical presentation doesn't match imaging findings 2, 7

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not rely on duplex ultrasound alone for iliac artery assessment:

  • Duplex has excellent negative predictive value (97-100%) for excluding disease, but positive predictive value ranges only 60-89%, requiring CTA confirmation of positive findings 7
  • Misalignment of the ultrasound beam with flow results in significant underestimation of velocity and even greater underestimation of pressure gradient due to the squared relationship between velocity and pressure 1
  • Patient discomfort during prolonged duplex examination may limit adequate visualization 1

When duplex and clinical findings conflict, the high pre-test probability from physical examination should cause you to doubt the echocardiographic results and obtain additional imaging. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Pressure Discrepancies Between Angiography and Duplex Ultrasound in Iliac Artery Assessment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Imaging Modalities for Severe Stenosis of Left Common Iliac Artery

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Imaging for Suspected Iliac Artery Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What is the best initial imaging modality for severe stenosis of the left common iliac artery?
What degrees of area stenosis and diameter stenosis on cardiac computed tomography (CT) predict hemodynamically significant lesions?
Can a computed tomography (CT) scan with contrast agent show iliac stenosis?
Does the standard timeline for symptom improvement apply to a patient with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and anxiety who has undergone three dosage switches of citalopram (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)) within one month?
Why is the pressure measured during an angiogram of the iliac artery higher than that from an arterial duplex scan, and which method provides a more accurate pressure reading?
What is the best course of treatment for a patient with Type 2 respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and adynamic ileus?
Does increasing exercise improve symptoms in a middle-aged patient with moderate mitral valve regurgitation who is otherwise healthy?
For a patient with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and anxiety, taking citalopram (SSRI), who has undergone multiple dosage adjustments within a short period and is currently on 52mg, will the mood improvement timeline restart with each dosage change, requiring 6-12 weeks to stabilize after the last adjustment?
What is the accuracy of the Curo L7 home lipids tester for patients, especially those with a history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes, and taking medications such as statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.