Complete ANA Profile Panel for Diagnosing Autoimmune Diseases
Overview of the ANA Testing Algorithm
The diagnosis of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases requires a structured panel approach starting with ANA screening by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA), followed by specific antibody testing based on the pattern and titer, with anti-dsDNA and extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) antibodies forming the core diagnostic panel. 1
First-Level Screening: ANA by IIFA
- IIFA on HEp-2 cells is the reference standard method for ANA screening, with sensitivity of 90-100% for systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases 1, 2
- The screening dilution should be 1:160 on conventional HEp-2 substrates for adult populations, representing the 95th percentile cutoff with 95.8% sensitivity and 86.2% specificity 1, 2
- Both the titer and immunofluorescence pattern must be reported, as different patterns indicate different autoantibodies and associated diseases 1, 2
- Alternative automated methods (ELISA, multiplex assays) may have different false negative and false positive ratios; if clinical suspicion is strong and the alternative method is negative, IIFA must be performed 1
Critical Interpretation Points for ANA Titers
- At 1:40 dilution, 31.7% of healthy individuals test positive 2
- At 1:80 dilution, 13.3% of healthy individuals test positive with specificity of only 74.7% for SLE 2
- At 1:160 dilution, only 5.0% of healthy individuals test positive, with specificity improving to 86.2% while maintaining 95.8% sensitivity 2
- Titers ≥1:160 warrant specific antibody testing regardless of symptoms due to substantially higher positive likelihood ratio 2
Second-Level Testing: Pattern-Directed Specific Antibodies
Homogeneous Pattern
Order anti-dsDNA antibodies first when homogeneous pattern is present, especially if SLE is clinically suspected 1, 2
Anti-dsDNA antibodies (diagnostic for SLE):
- Use double-screening strategy: solid phase assay (ELISA/FEIA) first for sensitivity, followed by Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) for confirmation and high specificity 1, 2
- Report results quantitatively for monitoring purposes 1
- Found in 3.2% of patients with suspected autoimmune disease who have SLE 3
Anti-histone antibodies: specific for drug-induced lupus 4
Anti-nucleosome antibodies: associated with SLE 3
Anti-Sm antibodies: highly specific for SLE, found in 22% of SLE patients 3, 4
Speckled Pattern (Fine or Coarse)
Order complete ENA panel for speckled patterns, as this pattern is associated with multiple autoimmune diseases 1, 2
Fine Speckled Pattern Antibodies:
Anti-SSA/Ro antibodies:
Anti-SSB/La antibodies:
Anti-Scl-70 (topoisomerase-1) antibodies:
Coarse Speckled Pattern Antibodies:
Anti-U1-RNP antibodies:
Anti-Sm antibodies:
Centromere Pattern
- Anti-centromere antibodies (CENP-A, B, C, F):
Nucleolar Pattern
Order nucleolar-specific antibodies when this pattern is present, as it strongly suggests systemic sclerosis or overlap syndromes 2, 6
- Anti-PM/Scl antibodies: associated with polymyositis-scleroderma overlap syndrome 2
- Anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies: associated with diffuse systemic sclerosis with renal crisis 2
- Anti-fibrillarin (U3-RNP) antibodies: associated with systemic sclerosis 2
- Anti-Th/To antibodies: associated with limited systemic sclerosis 6
Cytoplasmic Patterns
Cytoplasmic patterns must be reported and specified, as they indicate specific autoimmune conditions 1, 6
Anti-Jo-1 antibodies:
Anti-ribosomal P antibodies:
Disease-Specific Antibody Profiles
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
SLE patients frequently have multiple types of ANA, but anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm are diagnostic 4
- Diagnostic antibodies: anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm 1, 4
- Common antibodies: anti-SSA/Ro (found in 48% of SLE patients), anti-SSB/La, anti-RNP, anti-histone, anti-nucleosome, anti-ribosomal P 3, 5
- Monitoring: Use quantitative anti-dsDNA with the same method consistently; do not repeat ANA testing 1, 2
- Additional testing: Anti-C1q antibodies (present in almost 100% of active lupus nephritis), complement levels (C3, C4) 2
- Prevalence: 3.2% of patients with suspected autoimmune disease; 6% in females 3
Sjögren's Syndrome
- Primary antibodies: anti-SSA/Ro (40-60% of primary Sjögren's), anti-SSB/La 2, 5
- Anti-SSA found in 86% of Sjögren's syndrome patients in one study 5
- Prevalence: 1.7% of patients with suspected autoimmune disease 3
Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma)
- Diffuse cutaneous: anti-Scl-70 (topoisomerase-1), anti-RNA polymerase III 2, 3
- Limited cutaneous (CREST): anti-centromere antibodies 2, 4
- Overlap syndromes: anti-PM/Scl, anti-U3-RNP (fibrillarin), anti-Th/To 2, 6
- Prevalence: 19% of scleroderma patients have anti-Scl-70 3
Mixed Connective Tissue Disease (MCTD)
- Diagnostic antibody: anti-U1-RNP in isolation (restricted to this antibody) 4
- Anti-SSA may also be present, more common in younger patients 3
- Prevalence: 40% of MCTD patients have anti-RNP 3
Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis
- Myositis-specific antibodies: anti-Jo-1 (most common), anti-Mi-2, anti-SRP, anti-MDA5 2, 3
- Overlap antibodies: anti-PM/Scl 2
- Anti-Jo-1 associated with pulmonary fibrosis and poor prognosis 4
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
- ANA profile has limited significance for RA diagnosis 3
- When present: anti-SSA, anti-hnRNP A1 (50% of RA patients in one study) 3, 7
- Prevalence: 2.5% of patients with suspected autoimmune disease 3
Special Considerations for Autoimmune Hepatitis
For patients under 18 years, any positivity at 1:20 for ANA/anti-smooth muscle antibodies or 1:10 for anti-LKM-1 is clinically relevant 2
- Type 1 autoimmune hepatitis: anti-smooth muscle antibodies (SMA), atypical p-ANCA (50-96% of cases) 2
- Type 2 autoimmune hepatitis: anti-liver/kidney microsomal type 1 (anti-LKM-1), anti-liver cytosol type 1 (anti-LC1) 2
Diseases Where ANA Profile Has Limited Utility
ANA profile testing is of little significance for the following conditions 3:
- Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) - prevalence 1.5%, highest in males at 1.9% 3
- ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) 3
- Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) 3
- Adult-onset Still's disease (ASD) 3
- Behçet's disease (BD) 3
Critical Pitfalls and Caveats
Testing Methodology Issues
- Always specify the testing method in reports, as IIFA and automated methods have fundamentally different test characteristics 1, 6
- Use the same laboratory and method for serial monitoring to avoid discrepant results 2
- In-house assays must be standardized according to international standards (WHO, CDC/IUIS) 1
Interpretation Errors to Avoid
- Never diagnose based on ANA alone; diagnosis requires compatible clinical symptoms, laboratory abnormalities, and when appropriate, histological findings 2
- Do not repeat ANA testing for monitoring disease activity once diagnosis is established; ANA is for diagnostic purposes only 1, 2
- In high clinical suspicion cases, order specific antibody testing regardless of ANA result, as some autoantibodies (anti-Jo-1, anti-ribosomal P, anti-SSA/Ro) may be present in ANA-negative patients 1, 2
- Testing for ANA-specific antibodies cannot be gated on ANA patterns alone, as there is redundancy with various clinical diagnoses 5
Age and Sex Considerations
- Younger patients with SLE are more likely to have anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-histone, or anti-ribosomal P antibodies 3
- Younger patients with RA or MCTD are more likely to have anti-SSA antibodies 3
- No significant sex differences exist for most autoantibodies, except in RA and AS 3
- Prevalence of most autoimmune diseases is closely associated with age, with different variation characteristics among age groups for different diseases 3
Clinical Context Requirements
- Provide detailed clinical information on laboratory requisitions so the laboratory can assess results and decide on subsequent reflex testing 2
- Only 11.8% of patients suspected of having systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases actually have them, emphasizing the importance of clinical correlation 3
- Up to 25% of apparently healthy individuals can be ANA-positive by IIFA, and many will never develop autoimmune disease 2, 6
Reflex Testing Strategy
Recognition of both nuclear and cytoplasmic patterns enables automated reflex testing and improves diagnostic utility 6
- Homogeneous pattern: automatically reflex to anti-dsDNA and anti-histone 6
- Speckled pattern: automatically reflex to anti-Sm, anti-RNP, anti-SSA/Ro, anti-SSB/La 6
- Nucleolar pattern: automatically reflex to anti-Scl-70 6
- Centromere pattern: automatically reflex to anti-centromere antibody quantification 6