What is the recommended treatment approach for a patient with localized prostate cancer who is a candidate for brachytherapy (radiation therapy using radioactive seeds)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 19, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

Brachytherapy as monotherapy is indicated for low-risk prostate cancer (cT1c-T2a, Gleason grade 2-6, PSA <10 ng/mL), with cancer-control rates exceeding 90% at medium-term follow-up, comparable to radical prostatectomy. 1

Patient Selection Criteria

Ideal candidates for permanent seed brachytherapy:

  • Low-risk disease characteristics: clinical stage T1c-T2a, Gleason score ≤6, PSA <10 ng/mL 1, 2
  • Prostate volume suitable for implantation (very large or very small prostates are problematic) 1
  • Absence of significant lower urinary tract symptoms (low International Prostate Symptom Score) 1
  • No prior transurethral resection of prostate (TURP increases incontinence risk substantially) 1
  • Life expectancy >10 years 2, 3

Patients who should NOT receive brachytherapy monotherapy:

  • High-risk disease (unless combined with external beam radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy) 1
  • Previous TURP (significantly increased incontinence risk from acute retention and bladder neck contractures) 1
  • Severe baseline urinary obstructive symptoms 1
  • Very large prostate glands (neoadjuvant ADT may be used to shrink prostate to acceptable size) 1

Treatment Approach by Risk Category

Low-risk disease:

  • Brachytherapy monotherapy is appropriate using either iodine-125 (145 Gy prescribed dose) or palladium-103 (125 Gy prescribed dose) 1
  • Single modality treatment achieves >85% 5-year freedom from biochemical failure 4

Favorable intermediate-risk disease:

  • Brachytherapy alone OR in combination with external beam radiation therapy (40-50 Gy) are acceptable options 1, 3
  • When combining modalities, boost doses are 110 Gy for iodine-125 and 100 Gy for palladium-103 after 40-50 Gy external beam 1
  • 5-year freedom from biochemical failure ranges 69-97% 4

High-risk disease:

  • Brachytherapy should NOT be used as monotherapy 1
  • If brachytherapy is used, it MUST be combined with external beam radiation therapy (40-50 Gy) PLUS 24-36 months of androgen deprivation therapy 1, 3
  • This triple combination (brachytherapy + EBRT + ADT) reduces prostate cancer-specific mortality (adjusted HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.14-0.73) compared to brachytherapy alone 1

Technical Requirements

Mandatory technical standards:

  • Dosimetric planning must be performed either prior to or during implantation 1
  • Transrectal ultrasound guidance should be used for predictive dosimetry and seed placement 1
  • Modified peripheral implantation technique is required to minimize urethral overdose (>200% of prescribed dose) 1
  • Postimplantation dosimetry MUST be performed at 4 weeks for iodine-125 and 2-3 weeks for palladium-103 1
  • Task Group 43 (TG-43) dosimetric parameters should be used for dose calculations 1

Isotope selection:

  • Either iodine-125 or palladium-103 may be used (no evidence favoring one over the other) 1
  • For temporary implants, iridium is the standard isotope 1

Advantages Over Other Modalities

Compared to radical prostatectomy:

  • Treatment completed in single day with minimal time away from normal activities 1
  • Minimal incontinence risk in patients without prior TURP 1
  • Short-term erectile function preservation superior 1
  • No surgical complications (bleeding, anesthesia risks) 1

Compared to external beam radiation:

  • Single-day treatment versus 8-9 weeks of daily treatments 1
  • Delivers higher biologically equivalent dose to prostate (approximately 2x that of external beam) 5
  • Superior dose conformality with minimal bladder and rectal exposure 1

Disadvantages and Side Effects

Urinary complications:

  • Irritative voiding symptoms commonly persist for up to 1 year after implantation 1
  • Risk of acute urinary retention requiring catheterization 1
  • Brachytherapy exacerbates urinary obstructive symptoms more than external beam radiation 1, 3
  • Incontinence risk significantly elevated in patients with prior TURP 1

Sexual function:

  • Progressive erectile dysfunction develops over several years (not immediate like surgery) 1
  • Similar erectile dysfunction rates as external beam radiation therapy 1

Other considerations:

  • Requires general anesthesia 1
  • Proctitis rates similar to external beam radiation 1
  • Patients must follow radioprotective measures: avoid close contact with children and pregnant women, use condoms, filter urine, inform physicians before pelvic interventions 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do NOT use brachytherapy with temporary implants for stage T1 or T2a tumors outside of randomized clinical trials 1

Retropubic brachytherapy should no longer be used (transperineal approach is standard) 1

Do NOT omit postimplantation dosimetry - this is essential for quality assurance and must be performed at specified intervals 1

Do NOT use brachytherapy monotherapy for high-risk disease - requires combination with external beam radiation and ADT 1, 3

Avoid brachytherapy in patients with significant baseline urinary symptoms - these will be substantially worsened 1

Long-Term Outcomes

Biochemical control rates:

  • Low-risk: >85% at 5 years, 67-87% at 10-15 years 4, 6
  • Intermediate-risk: 69-97% at 5 years 4
  • High-risk (with EBRT + ADT): 63-80% at 5 years 4

Survival outcomes:

  • 10-year overall survival >85% 4
  • 10-year cancer-specific mortality <5% 4
  • 10-year distant metastasis rate <10% 4

Quality of life:

  • Grade 3-4 toxicities rare (<4% in most series) 4
  • Quality of life improved compared to surgery 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment Selection for Localized Prostate Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Nature reviews. Urology, 2017

Research

Does brachytherapy have a role in the treatment of prostate cancer?

Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 1996

Research

Modern brachytherapy for treatment of prostate cancer.

Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center, 2007

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.