Soft Systolic Murmur at Lower Left Sternal Border
A soft systolic murmur at the lower left sternal border most commonly represents tricuspid regurgitation, a ventricular septal defect, or a flow murmur across the right ventricular outflow tract, and requires echocardiography if there are any associated abnormal findings or if the patient has cardiovascular risk factors. 1
Primary Differential Diagnoses by Location
Tricuspid Regurgitation
- The most common pathological cause at the lower left sternal border is tricuspid regurgitation (TR), particularly in the context of right heart pathology. 1
- In injection drug users presenting with fever, petechiae, Osler's nodes, and Janeway lesions, a right heart murmur in early to midsystole at the lower left sternal border likely represents TR without pulmonary hypertension. 1
- The murmur typically increases with inspiration (Carvallo's sign) due to increased venous return to the right heart. 1
Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD)
- VSD produces a pansystolic murmur at the lower left sternal border with high sensitivity on physical examination (100% detection rate in one study). 2
- The murmur reflects continuous flow between chambers with widely different pressures throughout systole. 3
Right Ventricular Outflow Obstruction
- Pulmonic stenosis produces an ejection sound heard only in the pulmonic area and left sternal border during expiration. 1
- Intraventricular pressure gradients (including across the moderator band) can cause systolic murmurs at the lower left sternal border but are poorly detected on physical examination (only 18% sensitivity). 2, 4
Critical Associated Findings That Change Management
Findings Requiring Echocardiography
- Fixed splitting of the second heart sound during inspiration and expiration with a grade 2/6 midsystolic murmur suggests atrial septal defect. 1
- Any murmur grade ≥3/6 warrants echocardiography regardless of other findings. 5
- Left ventricular failure, history of thromboembolism, or abnormal electrocardiogram/chest X-ray mandate echocardiographic evaluation. 1, 5
Dynamic Auscultation Maneuvers
- Systolic murmurs that increase after ventricular premature beats or during long cycle lengths in atrial fibrillation suggest significant valvular disease. 5
- Murmurs that increase with standing and decrease with squatting suggest mitral valve prolapse rather than right-sided pathology. 3
Diagnostic Approach Algorithm
Step 1: Assess Murmur Characteristics
- Grade the intensity (1-6 scale) - grade ≥3/6 requires echocardiography. 5
- Determine timing: early systolic, midsystolic, late systolic, or pansystolic. 1
- Assess radiation pattern and location of maximal intensity. 1
Step 2: Evaluate Associated Cardiac Findings
- Check for splitting of S2 (fixed vs. physiologic vs. reversed). 1
- Listen for additional sounds (clicks, S3, S4, ejection sounds). 6
- Palpate for displaced or prominent apical impulse suggesting ventricular hypertrophy. 6
Step 3: Perform Dynamic Maneuvers
- Assess respiratory variation (inspiration increases right-sided murmurs). 1
- Evaluate response to Valsalva, standing, and squatting if mitral pathology suspected. 3
Step 4: Risk Stratification
- Echocardiography is mandatory for any patient with suspected significant heart disease based on murmur characteristics, associated symptoms, or abnormal ancillary findings. 5, 2
- Physical examination alone has limited accuracy for determining the exact cause, particularly when multiple lesions are present (only 55% accuracy for combined valve disease). 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume a soft murmur is benign without considering the clinical context - severe aortic stenosis can present with a soft murmur when left ventricular ejection fraction is severely diminished. 2
- Physical examination missed significant heart disease completely in 2% of patients in one study, emphasizing the need for echocardiography when clinical suspicion exists. 2
- Mitral valve prolapse with click-murmur may be misdiagnosed as a benign flow murmur if the ejection click is not recognized. 3
- Combined aortic and mitral valve disease is frequently missed on physical examination (only 55% sensitivity). 2