Cure Rate of Radiotherapy for Recurrent Sacrococcygeal Chordoma
Cure is virtually impossible for recurrent sacrococcygeal chordoma, and radiotherapy alone offers extremely poor local control rates—approximately 14% (1 of 7 patients) achieved local control in the highest quality evidence available. 1
Critical Context: Prior Radiation Status Determines Feasibility
The feasibility and potential benefit of radiotherapy for recurrent sacrococcygeal chordoma depends entirely on whether the patient received prior radiation to the same anatomical area 2:
For Patients WITHOUT Prior Radiation to the Recurrence Site
Salvage radiotherapy with curative intent should be delivered using the same high-dose approach as primary treatment, requiring at least 74 GyE in conventional fractionation (1.8-2 GyE) for photon and proton therapy. 2 However, even with optimal dosing:
- Local control rates remain poor: In the definitive study by DeLaney et al., only 1 of 7 patients (14%) with recurrent sacral chordoma achieved local control after combined surgery and high-dose proton/photon radiation therapy, compared to 12 of 14 (86%) for primary tumors 1
- The mean follow-up for the single locally controlled recurrent case was only 2.9 years, suggesting even this success may be temporary 1
- Definitive radiotherapy alone (without surgery) is a reasonable alternative to surgery plus radiation, although neither approach is very effective 2
For Patients WITH Prior Radiation to the Same Area
Re-irradiation is only feasible if high-dose radiation can be delivered without exceeding organ-at-risk dose constraints, which is often impossible in the sacral region. 2 When re-irradiation cannot achieve adequate target coverage without exceeding dose limits, other treatment modalities are preferable 2
- The radiotherapist must reconstruct the previous radiation dose distribution accurately, but there is insufficient data to recommend an optimal re-irradiation dose and fractionation scheme 2, 3
- Carbon ion therapy may be considered for re-irradiation after initial low-LET treatment, as it may be more effective against radio-resistant clones selected by the first treatment 2
- Low-dose re-irradiation with palliative intent can be appropriate only if performed with negligible risk of toxicity 2
Evidence from Modern Particle Therapy Studies
Recent carbon ion and proton therapy studies provide additional context, though they primarily enrolled primary tumors:
- In a carbon ion study of 56 patients (15 with recurrent tumors), the 2-year and 3-year local control was 76% and 53% overall, but treatment for primary tumor resulted in significantly better local control than recurrent disease 4
- A randomized trial of 82 patients (13% recurrent) showed 2-year and 4-year local progression-free survival of 84% and 70%, but the study was not powered to analyze recurrent cases separately 5
- The definitive comparative study showed local control of 1/7 (14%) for recurrent vs. 12/14 (86%) for primary sacral chordomas treated with surgery and radiation 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume radiotherapy alone offers meaningful cure rates for recurrent disease: The evidence consistently shows cure is virtually impossible, and the potential for cure is nil in most cases 2
- Do not proceed with re-irradiation without accurate reconstruction of previous dose distribution and verification that organ-at-risk constraints can be respected 2, 3
- Do not use low-dose radiation (<70 Gy) expecting disease control: Higher doses (≥70 Gy) may reduce local recurrence, but lower doses are associated with complications without disease control benefit 6
Recommended Approach for Recurrent Disease
The treatment goal should shift from cure to palliation, with careful selection of interventions that balance morbidity and quality of life 2:
- Salvage re-resection with curative intent should only be attempted in highly selected patients with isolated disease, long disease-free interval, and good performance status 2
- For patients with multifocal recurrent disease, cure is virtually impossible and aggressive curative-intent treatment should not be performed 2
- Palliative care should be incorporated from the beginning, including pain control, symptom management, and discussion of patient goals 2