What is the management approach for an adult patient with a ventricular septal defect (VSD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 19, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Ventricular Septal Defect in Adults

Adults with VSD and hemodynamically significant left-to-right shunt (Qp:Qs ≥1.5:1) with left ventricular volume overload should undergo VSD closure when pulmonary artery systolic pressure is less than 50% of systemic pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance is less than one-third systemic resistance. 1

Indications for VSD Closure

Class I Recommendations (Definitive Indications)

  • Hemodynamically significant shunt: VSD closure is mandatory when Qp:Qs ≥1.5:1 with evidence of left ventricular volume overload, provided PA systolic pressure <50% systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance <1/3 systemic 1, 2

  • Symptomatic heart failure: Closure is indicated for patients with heart failure symptoms attributable to left-to-right shunting without severe pulmonary vascular disease 2

  • History of infective endocarditis: VSD closure is recommended for patients with prior IE caused by the VSD 1, 2

Class IIa Recommendations (Reasonable to Perform)

  • Progressive aortic regurgitation: Surgical closure of perimembranous or supracristal VSD is reasonable when worsening AR develops from VSD-associated aortic valve prolapse, regardless of hemodynamic significance 1, 3, 2
    • This is particularly critical as 6% of patients develop progressive AR, and aortic cusp damage may become irreversible with prolonged exposure to shunt flow 4
    • Aortic regurgitation and aortic cusp prolapse were the most common indications for closure in adult series (56.6% and 49.3% respectively) 4

Class IIb Recommendations (May Be Considered)

  • Borderline pulmonary hypertension: VSD closure may be considered when Qp:Qs ≥1.5:1 with PA systolic pressure 50% or more of systemic and/or pulmonary vascular resistance greater than one-third systemic 1

    • This represents a gray zone requiring careful hemodynamic assessment via cardiac catheterization 3
  • Post-endocarditis: Surgical closure may be reasonable after IE caused by VSD if not otherwise contraindicated 1

Absolute Contraindications to VSD Closure (Class III: Harm)

VSD closure must not be performed in the following scenarios:

  • Eisenmenger syndrome: PA systolic pressure >2/3 systemic, pulmonary vascular resistance >2/3 systemic, or net right-to-left shunt 1, 2
  • Exercise-induced desaturation indicating severe pulmonary vascular disease 3, 2

These patients have irreversible pulmonary vascular disease and closure would increase left-to-right shunting with high mortality risk 1

Diagnostic Evaluation Algorithm

Initial Assessment

  • Echocardiography is the primary diagnostic modality and must assess: 3
    • VSD location, number, and size
    • Presence and extent of aneurysmal tissue (particularly for perimembranous VSDs)
    • Aortic valve morphology and degree of prolapse
    • Severity of aortic regurgitation
    • Left ventricular volume overload and systolic/diastolic function
    • Pulmonary artery pressure estimation

When to Perform Cardiac Catheterization

  • Mandatory when pulmonary hypertension is suspected to assess operability and determine if closure is feasible 3, 2
  • When noninvasive data are inconclusive regarding hemodynamics 3
  • Critical for distinguishing flow-mediated (reversible) from resistance-mediated (irreversible) pulmonary hypertension 2

Surgical Approach and Technical Considerations

Preferred Closure Method

  • Surgical closure is the gold standard for perimembranous, supracristal, and inlet VSDs 5
  • Patch closure is superior to suture closure: Residual VSDs occurred in 6 of 8 patients with suture closure versus significantly fewer with patch closure 6
  • Right atrial approach with patch closure is typically used 2

Role of Catheter-Based Closure

  • Muscular VSDs: Catheter closure with Amplatzer Muscular VSD Occluder is effective and appropriate 7, 5
  • Perimembranous VSDs: Percutaneous closure with Amplatzer Membranous VSD Occluder is not recommended due to significant risk of complete heart block 5

Intraoperative Considerations

  • Transesophageal echocardiography use is associated with:

    • Fewer residual VSDs 6
    • Less moderate or greater tricuspid valve regurgitation 6
    • Less aortic regurgitation 6
  • Evaluate for associated muscular VSDs as they may only manifest after closure of the dominant defect 2

Special Scenarios

Closed (Aneurysmal) Perimembranous VSD

Surgical closure is recommended even in asymptomatic patients to prevent life-threatening complications including: 3

  • Aortic valve prolapse with progressive AR
  • Infective endocarditis (6-fold increased risk, 13.7% incidence)
  • Aneurysm rupture
  • Right ventricular outflow tract obstruction

Post-Myocardial Infarction VSD

  • Immediate IABP insertion with early surgical repair (within 3-9 days) achieves 89% survival versus 92% first-year mortality without surgery 2
  • Transcatheter closure is increasingly viable with 32% mortality in recent series, comparable to surgical mortality of 30-50% 8
  • Brief delay for patient stabilization is appropriate, but untreated patients risk rapid deterioration 8

Medical Management

For Patients Not Candidates for Closure

  • ACE inhibitors for chronic heart failure symptoms and aortic regurgitation 2
  • Diuretics (furosemide) for volume management and pulmonary congestion 7, 2
  • Nitrates for symptom relief in patients without hypotension 7, 2

Conservative Management

  • Small restrictive VSDs (Qp:Qs <1.5:1) with normal pulmonary pressures should be managed conservatively with surveillance 7, 2
  • These patients have 96% 25-year survival rate 7, 2

Long-Term Follow-Up Protocol

Frequency Based on Clinical Status

  • Annual follow-up required for: 7, 2

    • Residual heart failure
    • Residual shunts
    • Pulmonary arterial hypertension
    • Aortic or tricuspid regurgitation
    • RV or LV outflow tract obstruction
  • Every 3-5 years if: Complete closure with no residual shunt or complications 2

Surveillance Echocardiography Must Assess

  • Development of aortic or tricuspid regurgitation 7, 2
  • Degree of residual shunt 2
  • Left ventricular function and volume overload 7
  • Pulmonary artery pressure 7
  • Development of double-chambered right ventricle 7, 2
  • Development of discrete subaortic stenosis 7, 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Misdiagnosis: Small VSDs may be mistaken for innocent murmurs; vigilant monitoring for complications such as aortic valve prolapse, double-chambered RV, or subaortic stenosis development is essential 2

  • Delayed intervention for AR: Aortic cusp damage may become irreversible with prolonged shunt exposure; VSD with aortic valve deformity or AR should be treated aggressively before disease progression occurs 4

  • Concomitant aortic valve repair: This was the only significant risk factor for late AR progression in multivariable analysis, suggesting that isolated VSD closure is preferable when the aortic valve is not severely damaged 4

  • Failure to recognize spontaneous closure potential: This is particularly relevant for muscular VSDs 7

Surgical Outcomes

  • Early mortality: 0% in contemporary series 6
  • Late mortality: 5% with mean follow-up of 10.3 years 6
  • Patient survival does not differ from expected survival in reference population (p=0.75) 6
  • Morbidity: High-grade AV block requiring pacemaker occurs in <3% 6
  • Late reoperation rate: 2.6% due to AR, infective endocarditis, or residual VSD 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Closed Subaortic Aneurysmal Perimembranous VSD

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Diagnosis and Management of Ventricular Septal Defects.

Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024

Guideline

Treatment of Muscular Ventricular Septal Defect

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Transcatheter treatment of postinfarct ventricular septal defects.

Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2020

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.